{ "schema_version": 1, "source_compilation_context": { "ca": { "attribution": { "inventory": { "name": "Compute Atlas", "creator": "Edward Kubiak", "url": "https://www.compute-atlas.com/api", "license": "CC BY 4.0", "license_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "snapshot_url": "https://www.compute-atlas.com/api/facilities", "retrieved": "2026-10-14", "sha256": "79ad432dab7c128e428234c9d0dd40933114b415a4a5d697db00095637d50f37", "changes": "Added provenance, publication-date distinctions, display-safe wording, quarantine flags and state partitioning. Original source records retained locally." }, "counties": "U.S. Census Bureau county boundaries (public domain)", "research": "Field-specific source context. See the linked source and limits on each record." }, "source_data_url": "https://datacentersatlas.com/data/ca.json", "updated": "2026-10-25" } }, "scope": "Retained county context, which can be broad or unresolved. No parcel or municipal jurisdiction is inferred. Research records retain their sources, dates and location limits. Counts are not a census of operating buildings. Company name links alone do not establish ownership or operation.", "collection": { "kind": "counties", "key": "06029", "label": "Kern County, California" }, "records": [ { "id": "beacon-golden-valley-ca", "state": "ca", "kind": "facility", "name": "Golden Valley Technology Hub", "group": "proposed", "status": "Operator-announced proposal", "raw_status": "proposed", "status_field": "current_status", "crypto": false, "type": "Data center (inventory classification)", "counties": [ "Kern" ], "city": "Elk Hills", "address": "", "who": "", "end_user": "", "mw": null, "power": "", "power_note": "", "investment": "", "jobs": "", "acres": null, "utility": "", "water": "", "incentives": "", "note": "Manual source context is available for this inherited inventory record. The inventory label and approximate geography are retained for discovery. This is not certification of current operation, ownership, a separate physical building, technical capacity or a precise parcel. Missing fields remain unknown. Namedoriginalprojectparticipant,issuer,localreporterororiginalcourtcopy; transaction/stage/datescoped.. KERO RubyRivera originalinterviews onGoldenValleyTechnologyHub nearElkHills identifyCRC'sproposal on100acreswith400000sf INCLUDINGDC,substation,officesandparking. MetadataJune23,2026publication/June24update; bodydescribesproposalrequiringadditionalreviews/approvalsbeforeconstruction. No observedcommissioning/allpermits. Existingunderutilizedpowerplantasprimarysupply isdeveloperplan, notexecutedenergizedDCITload ornewgenerationapproval. Closed-loopnotzerowaterwithdrawal; resourceconcerns/supportiveviewsattributednotactualmeasuredharm/benefit. SourceprovidesnoITMW/actualspend; Beaconpartnership/legalcounterpartyunverifiedfromthisbodyalone. Noallfield,currentoperatingbuilding,actualimpact,executedcontractorpaidfundscertification.", "date": "", "events": [], "timeline": [], "opened": "", "tier": "", "sources": [ { "url": "https://www.turnto23.com/news/in-your-neighborhood/taft-maricopa/massive-ai-data-center-proposed-for-kern-countys-elk-hills", "host": "turnto23.com", "date": "", "published": "", "checked": "2026-10-15", "date_kind": "publication date not established", "label": "Reviewed source" }, { "url": "https://www.goldenvalleytechhub.com/", "host": "www.goldenvalleytechhub.com", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-17", "label": "Reviewed source context" } ], "loc": { "lat": 35.34283, "lng": -118.72987, "precision": "county", "basis": "Shown at county level only. The dot is placed inside the county for the map and is not the site, its address or a parcel." }, "reviewed_evidence": [ { "overlay": "national-original-transactions-and-legal-stage-review-round73-2026-10-15.json", "scope": "Namedoriginalprojectparticipant,issuer,localreporterororiginalcourtcopy; transaction/stage/datescoped.", "fields": {}, "notes": [ "KERO RubyRivera originalinterviews onGoldenValleyTechnologyHub nearElkHills identifyCRC'sproposal on100acreswith400000sf INCLUDINGDC,substation,officesandparking. MetadataJune23,2026publication/June24update; bodydescribesproposalrequiringadditionalreviews/approvalsbeforeconstruction. No observedcommissioning/allpermits.", "Existingunderutilizedpowerplantasprimarysupply isdeveloperplan, notexecutedenergizedDCITload ornewgenerationapproval. Closed-loopnotzerowaterwithdrawal; resourceconcerns/supportiveviewsattributednotactualmeasuredharm/benefit. SourceprovidesnoITMW/actualspend; Beaconpartnership/legalcounterpartyunverifiedfromthisbodyalone.", "Noallfield,currentoperatingbuilding,actualimpact,executedcontractorpaidfundscertification." ], "sources": [ { "url": "https://www.turnto23.com/news/in-your-neighborhood/taft-maricopa/massive-ai-data-center-proposed-for-kern-countys-elk-hills", "host": "turnto23.com", "date": "", "published": "", "checked": "2026-10-15", "date_kind": "publication date not established", "label": "Reviewed source" } ], "whole_record_certified": false }, { "overlay": "encore-2026-10-17-batch2", "scope": "Limited source identity and stage review; not whole-record certification, parcel verification or a physical-site census.", "fields": { "current_stage_evidence": { "outcome": "operator-announced_proposal", "scope": "The project website identifies a proposed Beacon/CRC development at Elk Hills. Proposed closed-loop cooling and existing on-site generation do not establish a completed data center, zero water use or energization. Animated zero-percent counters are not technical facts. The label describes proposed development." } }, "notes": [ "The project website identifies a proposed Beacon/CRC development at Elk Hills. Proposed closed-loop cooling and existing on-site generation do not establish a completed data center, zero water use or energization. Animated zero-percent counters are not technical facts. The label describes proposed development." ], "sources": [ { "url": "https://www.goldenvalleytechhub.com/", "host": "www.goldenvalleytechhub.com", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-17", "label": "Reviewed source context" } ], "checked": "2026-10-17", "whole_record_certified": false } ], "manual_source_reviewed": true, "whole_record_certified": false, "field_evidence_present": false, "inventory_label_retained": true, "precision_label": "Exact site not published; shown at county level", "summary": "Elk Hills · Kern · Source context reviewed", "status_scope": "The project website identifies a proposed Beacon/CRC development at Elk Hills. Proposed closed-loop cooling and existing on-site generation do not establish a completed data center, zero water use or energization. Animated zero-percent counters are not technical facts. The label describes proposed development.", "location_display": { "policy": "reviewed-map-references-2026-10-23", "decision": "withheld_unreviewed_point", "scope": "The available point evidence does not establish a supported site location. No site pin, nearby distance or aerial destination is published. The original coordinate and its provenance remain in research history.", "county_display": "06029" } }, { "id": "rb-inyokern-data-center-ca", "state": "ca", "kind": "facility", "name": "RB Inyokern Data Center", "group": "proposed", "status": "Agency listed proposal", "raw_status": "proposed", "status_field": "current_status", "crypto": false, "type": "Data center (inventory classification)", "counties": [ "Kern" ], "city": "Inyokern", "address": "", "who": "", "end_user": "", "mw": null, "power": "", "power_note": "", "investment": "", "jobs": "", "acres": null, "utility": "", "water": "", "incentives": "", "note": "Manual source context is available for this inherited inventory record. The inventory label and approximate geography are retained for discovery. This is not certification of current operation, ownership, a separate physical building, technical capacity or a precise parcel. Missing fields remain unknown. current public docket activity, no substantive determination. Docket contains public support and opposition, not regulator findings proving commenters claims. No final approval, parcel, current site MW, hearing outcome or investment adopted from comment titles. Individual commenters not added to outreach list. Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building.", "date": "", "events": [ [ "2026-10-20", "The October 20, 2026 docket filing date records CEC Data Requests Set 3 for RB Inyokern. Staff requested further hazards information during environmental review. This is an administrative filing date, not construction commencement, a final exemption or physical operation." ], [ "2026-10-12", "The October 12, 2026 docket filing date records a separate resident public comment about the RB Inyokern proposal. The comment was submitted October 11. The filing date is distinct from its submission day and from the earlier well association comment; its concerns are not agency findings or verified impacts." ] ], "timeline": [], "opened": "", "tier": "", "sources": [ { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=26-SPPE-01", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "date": "", "published": "", "checked": "2026-10-14", "date_kind": "publication date not established", "label": "Reviewed source" }, { "url": "https://www.energy.ca.gov/powerplant/backup-generating-system/rb-inyokern-data-center", "host": "www.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" }, { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273160&DocumentContentId=120923", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" }, { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273104&DocumentContentId=120831", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" } ], "loc": { "lat": 35.37693, "lng": -118.76709, "precision": "county", "basis": "Shown at county level only. The dot is placed inside the county for the map and is not the site, its address or a parcel." }, "reviewed_evidence": [ { "overlay": "government-primary-review-round7-2026-10-14.json", "scope": "current public docket activity, no substantive determination", "fields": { "regulatory_docket": "26-SPPE-01", "project_name": "RB Inyokern Data Center", "docket_log_generated_date": "2026-10-14", "public_comments_present_through": "2026-10-12" }, "notes": [ "Docket contains public support and opposition, not regulator findings proving commenters claims. No final approval, parcel, current site MW, hearing outcome or investment adopted from comment titles. Individual commenters not added to outreach list.", "Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building." ], "sources": [ { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=26-SPPE-01", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "date": "", "published": "", "checked": "2026-10-14", "date_kind": "publication date not established", "label": "Reviewed source" } ], "whole_record_certified": false }, { "overlay": "Codex 3 research cohort 46", "scope": "The current CEC project page labels the exact RB Inyokern Small Power Plant Exemption project Under Review. Its October 20 staff data request continues review of the proposed backup generating project. Agency listed proposal is limited to the pending project and does not establish construction, operation or an approved exemption. CEC expressly distinguishes an exemption from later local and air approvals. The separate public comment is an attributed resident request, not a CEC impact finding.", "fields": { "current_stage_evidence": { "outcome": "current_exact_agency_review_of_proposed_project", "scope": "The current CEC project page labels the exact RB Inyokern Small Power Plant Exemption project Under Review. Its October 20 staff data request continues review of the proposed backup generating project. Agency listed proposal is limited to the pending project and does not establish construction, operation or an approved exemption. CEC expressly distinguishes an exemption from later local and air approvals. The separate public comment is an attributed resident request, not a CEC impact finding." }, "source_read_scope": { "current_cec_project_status_read": true, "staff_request_text_pages": [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], "public_comment_text_pages": [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ], "private_resident_names_and_household_details_excluded": true, "relative_staff_response_period_not_exported_as_exact_calendar_deadline": true } }, "notes": [ "The current CEC project page labels the exact RB Inyokern Small Power Plant Exemption project Under Review. Its October 20 staff data request continues review of the proposed backup generating project. Agency listed proposal is limited to the pending project and does not establish construction, operation or an approved exemption. CEC expressly distinguishes an exemption from later local and air approvals. The separate public comment is an attributed resident request, not a CEC impact finding.", "Existing identities, provider roles, locations, jurisdiction, quantities and physical opening fields remain unchanged. Publication, administrative filing and withdrawal dates are not physical opening dates." ], "sources": [ { "url": "https://www.energy.ca.gov/powerplant/backup-generating-system/rb-inyokern-data-center", "host": "www.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" }, { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=26-SPPE-01", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" }, { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273160&DocumentContentId=120923", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" }, { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273104&DocumentContentId=120831", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" } ], "checked": "2026-10-23", "whole_record_certified": false } ], "manual_source_reviewed": true, "whole_record_certified": false, "field_evidence_present": true, "inventory_label_retained": true, "precision_label": "Exact site not published; shown at county level", "summary": "Inyokern · Kern · Source context reviewed", "status_scope": "The current CEC project page labels the exact RB Inyokern Small Power Plant Exemption project Under Review. Its October 20 staff data request continues review of the proposed backup generating project. Agency listed proposal is limited to the pending project and does not establish construction, operation or an approved exemption. CEC expressly distinguishes an exemption from later local and air approvals. The separate public comment is an attributed resident request, not a CEC impact finding.", "event_evidence": [ { "date": "2026-10-20", "text": "The October 20, 2026 docket filing date records CEC Data Requests Set 3 for RB Inyokern. Staff requested further hazards information during environmental review. This is an administrative filing date, not construction commencement, a final exemption or physical operation.", "kind": "announced", "sources": [ { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273160&DocumentContentId=120923", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" } ] }, { "date": "2026-10-12", "text": "The October 12, 2026 docket filing date records a separate resident public comment about the RB Inyokern proposal. The comment was submitted October 11. The filing date is distinct from its submission day and from the earlier well association comment; its concerns are not agency findings or verified impacts.", "kind": "announced", "sources": [ { "url": "https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=273104&DocumentContentId=120831", "host": "efiling.energy.ca.gov", "published": "", "date": "", "checked": "2026-10-23", "label": "Reviewed government record" } ] } ], "location_display": { "policy": "reviewed-map-references-2026-10-23", "decision": "withheld_unreviewed_point", "scope": "The available point evidence does not establish a supported site location. No site pin, nearby distance or aerial destination is published. The original coordinate and its provenance remain in research history.", "county_display": "06029" } } ], "compilation_license": "withheld_pending_owner_decision" }