{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "source_compilation_context": {
    "mn": {
      "attribution": {
        "inventory": {
          "name": "Compute Atlas",
          "creator": "Edward Kubiak",
          "url": "https://www.compute-atlas.com/api",
          "license": "CC BY 4.0",
          "license_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
          "snapshot_url": "https://www.compute-atlas.com/api/facilities",
          "retrieved": "2026-10-14",
          "sha256": "79ad432dab7c128e428234c9d0dd40933114b415a4a5d697db00095637d50f37",
          "changes": "Added provenance, publication-date distinctions, display-safe wording, quarantine flags and state partitioning. Original source records retained locally."
        },
        "counties": "U.S. Census Bureau county boundaries (public domain)",
        "research": "Field-specific source context. See the linked source and limits on each record."
      },
      "source_data_url": "https://datacentersatlas.com/data/mn.json",
      "updated": "2026-10-24"
    }
  },
  "scope": "Retained county context, which can be broad or unresolved. No parcel or municipal jurisdiction is inferred. Research records retain their sources, dates and location limits. Counts are not a census of operating buildings. Company name links alone do not establish ownership or operation.",
  "collection": {
    "kind": "counties",
    "key": "27033",
    "label": "Cottonwood County, Minnesota"
  },
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "aaim-data-centers-mountain-lake-mn",
      "state": "mn",
      "kind": "facility",
      "name": "AAIM Data Centers  -  Mountain Lake (Minnesota 3 Energy Park)",
      "group": "unknown",
      "status": "Status unclear",
      "raw_status": "",
      "status_field": "",
      "crypto": false,
      "type": "Data center (inventory classification)",
      "counties": [
        "Cottonwood"
      ],
      "city": "Mountain Lake",
      "address": "",
      "who": "",
      "end_user": "",
      "mw": null,
      "power": "",
      "power_note": "",
      "investment": "",
      "jobs": "",
      "acres": null,
      "utility": "",
      "water": "",
      "incentives": "",
      "note": "Manual source context is available for this inherited inventory record. The inventory label and approximate geography are retained for discovery. This is not certification of current operation, ownership, a separate physical building, technical capacity or a precise parcel. Missing fields remain unknown. Mountain Lake historical council discussion. Minutes describe review request, not project approval, construction or operation. No operator named in minutes, AAIMalias requires separate match.250kannualrevenueestimate not taxaward paid.50dBexpectation without measurement/distance not achieved noise result. No exact street or researched parcelpoint. Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building.",
      "date": "",
      "events": [],
      "timeline": [],
      "opened": "",
      "tier": "",
      "sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://cityofmountainlakemn.gov/wp-content/uploads/10-7-24-City-Council-Minutes.pdf",
          "host": "cityofmountainlakemn.gov",
          "date": "2024-10-07",
          "published": "2024-10-07",
          "checked": "2026-10-14",
          "date_kind": "publication",
          "label": "Reviewed source"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.aaimdc.com/data-centers/minnesota-3/",
          "host": "www.aaimdc.com",
          "published": "",
          "date": "",
          "checked": "2026-10-23",
          "label": "Reviewed operator source"
        }
      ],
      "loc": {
        "lat": 44.00713,
        "lng": -95.18119,
        "precision": "county",
        "basis": "Shown at county level only. The dot is placed inside the county for the map and is not the site, its address or a parcel."
      },
      "reviewed_evidence": [
        {
          "overlay": "government-primary-review-round7-2026-10-14.json",
          "scope": "Mountain Lake historical council discussion",
          "fields": {
            "historical_city_meeting_date": "2024-10-07",
            "proposed_initial_power_mw": 10,
            "power_basis": "anticipated start load,not explicitIT",
            "proposed_location_description": "industrial district nexttoMilkSpecialtiesandBalzer",
            "proposed_use_description": "AIonly,noBitcoinorcryptocurrency mining"
          },
          "notes": [
            "Minutes describe review request, not project approval, construction or operation. No operator named in minutes, AAIMalias requires separate match.250kannualrevenueestimate not taxaward paid.50dBexpectation without measurement/distance not achieved noise result. No exact street or researched parcelpoint.",
            "Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "url": "https://cityofmountainlakemn.gov/wp-content/uploads/10-7-24-City-Council-Minutes.pdf",
              "host": "cityofmountainlakemn.gov",
              "date": "2024-10-07",
              "published": "2024-10-07",
              "checked": "2026-10-14",
              "date_kind": "publication",
              "label": "Reviewed source"
            }
          ],
          "whole_record_certified": false
        },
        {
          "overlay": "Codex 3 research cohort 58",
          "scope": "The selected original City minutes paragraph reports a future Utilities and Planning review of an AI computing proposal in the industrial district, without naming AAIM in that passage. The current original Minnesota 3 company page describes a facility in development with a future target and names only Minnesota. Those bodies do not independently complete the exact Mountain Lake and AAIM project crosswalk or establish physical construction or computing service. A closed attorney session without action is not project approval. Modeled cooling claims and anticipated utility effects are not exported as measured facility facts.",
          "fields": {
            "current_stage_evidence": {
              "outcome": "unnamed_city_proposal_and_state_only_issuer_exact_identity_held",
              "scope": "The selected original City minutes paragraph reports a future Utilities and Planning review of an AI computing proposal in the industrial district, without naming AAIM in that passage. The current original Minnesota 3 company page describes a facility in development with a future target and names only Minnesota. Those bodies do not independently complete the exact Mountain Lake and AAIM project crosswalk or establish physical construction or computing service. A closed attorney session without action is not project approval. Modeled cooling claims and anticipated utility effects are not exported as measured facility facts."
            },
            "source_read_scope": {
              "city_minutes_selected_project_paragraph_read": true,
              "city_project_paragraph_does_not_name_aaim": true,
              "issuer_minnesota3_main_body_read": true,
              "issuer_no_exact_city_in_main_body": true,
              "no_unnamed_project_identity_promotion": true,
              "no_closed_session_approval_inferred": true
            }
          },
          "notes": [
            "The selected original City minutes paragraph reports a future Utilities and Planning review of an AI computing proposal in the industrial district, without naming AAIM in that passage. The current original Minnesota 3 company page describes a facility in development with a future target and names only Minnesota. Those bodies do not independently complete the exact Mountain Lake and AAIM project crosswalk or establish physical construction or computing service. A closed attorney session without action is not project approval. Modeled cooling claims and anticipated utility effects are not exported as measured facility facts.",
            "Existing location, jurisdiction, provider roles, identities, quantities and physical opening dates remain unchanged. Proposal and administrative evidence do not certify computing operation."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "url": "https://cityofmountainlakemn.gov/wp-content/uploads/10-7-24-City-Council-Minutes.pdf",
              "host": "cityofmountainlakemn.gov",
              "published": "",
              "date": "",
              "checked": "2026-10-23",
              "label": "Reviewed government record"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://www.aaimdc.com/data-centers/minnesota-3/",
              "host": "www.aaimdc.com",
              "published": "",
              "date": "",
              "checked": "2026-10-23",
              "label": "Reviewed operator source"
            }
          ],
          "checked": "2026-10-23",
          "whole_record_certified": false
        }
      ],
      "manual_source_reviewed": true,
      "whole_record_certified": false,
      "field_evidence_present": true,
      "inventory_label_retained": true,
      "precision_label": "Exact site not published; shown at county level",
      "summary": "Mountain Lake · Cottonwood · Source context reviewed",
      "location_display": {
        "policy": "reviewed-map-references-2026-10-23",
        "decision": "withheld_unreviewed_point",
        "scope": "The available point evidence does not establish a supported site location. No site pin, nearby distance or aerial destination is published. The original coordinate and its provenance remain in research history.",
        "county_display": "27033"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "revolve-labs-windom-mn",
      "state": "mn",
      "kind": "facility",
      "name": "Revolve Labs Windom",
      "group": "stopped",
      "status": "Reported application withdrawal",
      "raw_status": "stopped",
      "status_field": "current_status",
      "crypto": true,
      "type": "Crypto/HPC (inventory classification)",
      "counties": [
        "Cottonwood"
      ],
      "city": "Windom",
      "address": "",
      "who": "",
      "end_user": "",
      "mw": null,
      "power": "",
      "power_note": "",
      "investment": "",
      "jobs": "",
      "acres": null,
      "utility": "",
      "water": "",
      "incentives": "",
      "note": "Manual source context is available for this inherited inventory record. The inventory label and approximate geography are retained for discovery. This is not certification of current operation, ownership, a separate physical building, technical capacity or a precise parcel. Missing fields remain unknown. Manual review of named-project reporting excerpts. Historical account and claims are attributed to publisher; no whole-record or current legal-status certification.. Visible publication date September 26 differs from URL/metadata September 25. No exact withdrawal day adopted. Glencoe capacity is another site, not Windom. Original signed law, permit, docket and any subsequent decisions take precedence. No future outcomes inferred. Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building.",
      "date": "",
      "events": [],
      "timeline": [],
      "opened": "",
      "tier": "",
      "sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://theenergymag.com/news/2024-09-25/revolve-bitcoin-mining-windom",
          "host": "theenergymag.com",
          "date": "2024-09-26",
          "published": "2024-09-26",
          "checked": "2026-10-14",
          "date_kind": "publication",
          "label": "Reviewed source"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.pinejournal.com/news/local/crypto-mining-company-withdraws-moose-lake-proposal",
          "host": "www.pinejournal.com",
          "published": "2026-03-12",
          "date": "2026-03-12",
          "checked": "2026-10-20",
          "label": "Cloquet Pine Journal"
        }
      ],
      "loc": {
        "lat": 44.01888,
        "lng": -95.19402,
        "precision": "county",
        "basis": "Shown at county level only. The dot is placed inside the county for the map and is not the site, its address or a parcel."
      },
      "reviewed_evidence": [
        {
          "overlay": "regional-outcomes-review-round20-2026-10-14.json",
          "scope": "Manual review of named-project reporting excerpts. Historical account and claims are attributed to publisher; no whole-record or current legal-status certification.",
          "fields": {
            "reported_action_type": "withdrawal-reported-secondhand",
            "reported_finding": "The EnergyMag reports Revolve withdrew Windom mining application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting.",
            "report_display_date": "2024-09-26",
            "independently_verified_current_status": null
          },
          "notes": [
            "Visible publication date September 26 differs from URL/metadata September 25. No exact withdrawal day adopted. Glencoe capacity is another site, not Windom.",
            "Original signed law, permit, docket and any subsequent decisions take precedence. No future outcomes inferred.",
            "Fields can apply to shared campus, regional or historical context; consult source review before assigning to a building."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "url": "https://theenergymag.com/news/2024-09-25/revolve-bitcoin-mining-windom",
              "host": "theenergymag.com",
              "date": "2024-09-26",
              "published": "2024-09-26",
              "checked": "2026-10-14",
              "date_kind": "publication",
              "label": "Reviewed source"
            }
          ],
          "whole_record_certified": false
        },
        {
          "overlay": "orchestra-F1-label-review-2026-10-20",
          "scope": "The EnergyMag reports withdrawal of Revolve Labs' Windom application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting. The Pine Journal's March 2026 Moose Lake account also identifies Windom as a prior withdrawn application. These reported application outcomes do not establish a physical shutdown or current stage at Glencoe or another Revolve location.",
          "fields": {
            "identity_label_context": {
              "previous_name": "Revolve Labs Windom (withdrawn)",
              "plain_name": "Revolve Labs Windom",
              "interpretation": "The EnergyMag reports withdrawal of Revolve Labs' Windom application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting. The Pine Journal's March 2026 Moose Lake account also identifies Windom as a prior withdrawn application. These reported application outcomes do not establish a physical shutdown or current stage at Glencoe or another Revolve location.",
              "outcome_wording_is_not_identity": true
            },
            "current_stage_evidence": {
              "outcome": "reported_application_withdrawal",
              "scope": "The EnergyMag reports withdrawal of Revolve Labs' Windom application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting. The Pine Journal's March 2026 Moose Lake account also identifies Windom as a prior withdrawn application. These reported application outcomes do not establish a physical shutdown or current stage at Glencoe or another Revolve location."
            }
          },
          "notes": [
            "The EnergyMag reports withdrawal of Revolve Labs' Windom application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting. The Pine Journal's March 2026 Moose Lake account also identifies Windom as a prior withdrawn application. These reported application outcomes do not establish a physical shutdown or current stage at Glencoe or another Revolve location.",
            "Inherited inventory name: Revolve Labs Windom (withdrawn). The wording is retained as provenance, not as an independently verified outcome.",
            "An application decision is separate from a current physical stage. No coordinate, address, parcel, company role, technical figure or physical milestone date is changed."
          ],
          "sources": [
            {
              "url": "https://theenergymag.com/news/2024-09-25/revolve-bitcoin-mining-windom",
              "host": "theenergymag.com",
              "published": "",
              "date": "",
              "checked": "2026-10-20",
              "label": "The EnergyMag"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://www.pinejournal.com/news/local/crypto-mining-company-withdraws-moose-lake-proposal",
              "host": "www.pinejournal.com",
              "published": "2026-03-12",
              "date": "2026-03-12",
              "checked": "2026-10-20",
              "label": "Cloquet Pine Journal"
            }
          ],
          "checked": "2026-10-20",
          "whole_record_certified": false
        }
      ],
      "manual_source_reviewed": true,
      "whole_record_certified": false,
      "field_evidence_present": true,
      "inventory_label_retained": true,
      "precision_label": "Exact site not published; shown at county level",
      "summary": "Windom · Cottonwood · Source context reviewed",
      "status_scope": "The EnergyMag reports withdrawal of Revolve Labs' Windom application, citing Minnesota Star Tribune reporting. The Pine Journal's March 2026 Moose Lake account also identifies Windom as a prior withdrawn application. These reported application outcomes do not establish a physical shutdown or current stage at Glencoe or another Revolve location.",
      "location_display": {
        "policy": "reviewed-map-references-2026-10-23",
        "decision": "withheld_unreviewed_point",
        "scope": "The available point evidence does not establish a supported site location. No site pin, nearby distance or aerial destination is published. The original coordinate and its provenance remain in research history.",
        "county_display": "27033"
      }
    }
  ],
  "compilation_license": "withheld_pending_owner_decision"
}
