Data Centers Atlas

Scheduled date: EdgeCore Reno Data Center Campus

Scheduled date: November 18, 2026

Scheduled event: Storey County notice lists an EdgeCore topping-off and ribbon-cutting function at 3615 USA Parkway, McCarran, on November 18, 2026. This is a future ceremony, not proof of opening, commissioning or full-campus delivery. The county index links two PDFs under swapped labels; the cited document contains the actual EdgeCore notice.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.storeycounty.org

Scheduled date: Cook Inlet Subsea-Compute & Infrastructure Hub

Scheduled date: November 2, 2026

Scheduled deadline: FERC notice sets comments and competing filings for DeepGreen P-15423-000 due at 5 p.m. Eastern Time. Application acceptance is not construction permission.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

govinfo.gov

Scheduled date: Google 5079-5087 Disk Drive Compute Campus (North San José)

Scheduled date: October 29, 2026

Scheduled event: The CPUC October 8 voting record holds Google-related draft resolution E-5455 to October 29, 2026 for further review. Next consideration is scheduled; approval, construction and an outcome are not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

ia.cpuc.ca.gov

Dated record: Muskie Data Campus

Recorded event date: October 29, 2026

Kentucky Power asks landowners for route feedback by this date

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Scheduled date: Big Sky Digital Infrastructure Campus

Scheduled date: October 29, 2026

Scheduled event: Montana DEQ lists October 29, 2026 as the public-comment deadline for the proposed Big Sky Campus well and associated environmental review. This is not a hearing, an approval or proof of construction.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

deq.mt.gov

News report: MCNI Concord Township Data Center

KIOW reported a county supervisor's account that a landowner was withdrawing from a proposed MCNI data-center land deal. Its earlier report described public opposition and an appealable agricultural-to-industrial rezoning denial. These are the outlet's accounts, not independently inspected land, zoning or appeal records, formal project withdrawal or a final environmental determination.

Record status: unknown. The later formal application or appeal disposition is unknown in this bounded review. A reported landowner decision about a business deal is distinct from a verified project withdrawal, final agency appeal outcome or resolution of every land-use objection.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: October 17, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The newer report does not establish an exact executed withdrawal, filing or agency event day. The earlier relative Wednesday vote description is not converted to an unverified exact date. The original current report JSON-LD records October 17, 2026 publication and a later same-day modification. The earlier report is dated September 10, 2026. Neither substitutes for an unverified formal filing day.

Raised or recorded by KIOW.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: NorthMark Strategies Spartanburg High-Performance Computing Center

Southern Environmental Law Center reported filing a request for a contested-case hearing on Valara's air permit, alleging errors in emissions calculations and public participation. It requested remand and restrictions on turbine construction. These are counsel's account, allegations and requested relief, not court findings or an independently inspected injunction.

Record status: unknown. The current court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. Counsel reported filing a request; the requested remand and construction restriction are not an order, verified injunction or final merits outcome.

Event date: October 16, 2026

Source publication date: October 16, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The counsel release expressly states that it filed the request that day, October 16, 2026. This is the filing counsel's stated date; no independent court stamp or docket acceptance was inspected. The original counsel release is explicitly dated October 16, 2026. Publication of the actual filed request packet and an original signed permit was not established.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

Southern Environmental Law Center

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Project Spring (Sand Springs)

Oklahoma Public Media Exchange reported Osage tribal officials' questions about water and consultation for Google's proposed Project Spring in Sand Springs. An October follow-up reported that a separate tribal-approval bill did not become law. These are outlet accounts; that legislative outcome does not establish project approval or resolution of the water questions.

Record status: unknown. The present mineral-lease and project disposition and outcome of the documented water questions are unknown in this bounded review. OPMX reported that a separate approval-authority bill did not become law. That report is not a verified project approval, denial, final lease decision or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: October 16, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The reports describe several interviews, council discussions and legislative actions without one independently inspected exact concern-event day for this item. Event date remains unknown; neither an interview nor a source-check day is substituted. The original OPMX follow-up was published October 16, 2026; its earlier water and consultation report was published June 25. The project page displays a January 14 update, but its exact first publication date is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Oklahoma Public Media Exchange.

Company-published statement

White Rose Partners stated on the Project Spring page that initial phases would use non-evaporative cooling and that later water decisions would be coordinated with Sand Springs. These are developer plans, not measured water use, permanent whole-campus commitments or verified approvals.

The original developer page explicitly identifies the same Sand Springs proposal. Its plans relate to the reported water questions, but it is not a verified Google-authored statement or an express answer to the later tribal bill. First publication date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Muskie Data Campus

Recorded event date: October 15, 2026

Kentucky Power open house on Muskie transmission line routes (scheduled)

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: October 15, 2026

Reported final closing deadline with Cleveland-Cliffs; outcome to be confirmed

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Mason County hyperscale data center and technology campus (Meta)

Recorded event date: October 13, 2026

Judge-Executive McNeill names Meta; Fiscal Court unanimously approves agreement/resolution

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Mason County hyperscale data center and technology campus (Meta)

Recorded event date: October 13, 2026

WCPO reports a lawsuit has been filed over the project; no court ruling yet

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

News report: Aligned HPC Campus at Former Pixelle Paper Mill (Chillicothe)

Scioto Post reported continued council discussion of power use, water consumption, wastewater and noise concerns about a possible data center at the former Chillicothe paper mill. The article also reported a council member describing utility staff projections; those positions are not measured impacts or an independently inspected engineering study.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of these reported concerns is not established by this bounded review.

Event date: October 12, 2026

Source publication date: October 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original article identifies the October 12, 2026 council session in its embedded-video captions; October 13 is publication. Videos and audio were not reviewed. Scioto Post displays October 13, 2026. The separate identity/context article from The Post displays August 31. Publication days are distinct from the October 12 meeting.

Raised or recorded by Scioto Post.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Cipher Colchis Campus

Recorded event date: October 13, 2026

Cipher furnished a Colchis update describing conditional Batch Zero status in an ERCOT audit process and future energization targets. This disclosure is not a final regulator approval or operating milestone.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.sec.gov

Permit and comment: Crusoe Warrenton Campus

Missouri Department of Natural Resources issued a construction air permit for emergency diesel generators, fire-pump engines and associated fuel storage at Warrenton Data Center, effective October 8, 2026, subject to nitrogen-oxide, testing, emergency-use and recordkeeping conditions. The authorization is not a violation finding or evidence of actual startup, measured emissions or delivered computing capacity.

Record status: unknown. Permit authorization is recorded. The current outcome of the ongoing permit conditions and current compliance is not established by this bounded review; unknown does not withdraw the effective permit or decide underlying public concerns.

Event date: October 8, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

October 8, 2026 is the effective date printed on the signed permit face. It is not inferred to be the first public posting,actual startup or a later compliance determination. The first online publication day is unknown. Permit-face effectiveness,application dates, PDF timestamps and URL folders do not supply that publication day.

Raised or recorded by Missouri Department of Natural Resources.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Cook Inlet Subsea-Compute & Infrastructure Hub

National Fisherman reported fishing, conservation and borough concerns about salmon migration, marine habitat, vessel navigation, heat, noise and public participation in the DeepGreen Cook Inlet proposal. It also reported the company's position that studies would address those questions. The underlying intervention filings and original company interview were not independently reviewed; these are reported concerns and positions, not findings of actual harm.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of the documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Reported progress, future commitments, permit notices or historical project statements do not establish actual impacts, current compliance or resolution of all concerns.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: October 7, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original source reports historical concerns or a developing procedure without one independently verified exact concern-event day; weekday or year-only references are not converted to guessed dates. The displayed original publication day is recorded separately from the event and source check.

Raised or recorded by National Fisherman.

Company statement reported by an outlet

DeepGreen stated, according to National Fisherman's account of an ADN interview, that a preliminary permit permits study rather than construction and that fisheries and marine-life questions would be studied. This is second-hand reporting of the company position, not a completed study or verified safety finding.

Trade publication quotes and attributes company response to ADN; original ADN interview not independently inspected.

Response publication date: October 7, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Mason County hyperscale data center and technology campus (Meta)

Recorded event date: October 6, 2026

County attorney presents development/community benefits agreement: Crisham LLC, 396 MW initial phase, IRB/PILOT structure, at least 130M infrastructure

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Muskie Data Campus

Recorded event date: October 5, 2026

Amended Kentucky Power ESA (executed Oct 1) doubles contracted capacity to 1 GW, moves phase 2 to 2029, adds 100 million dollars bill credits (PSC approval required)

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

News report: Stargate The Barn Campus

Michigan Public Radio Network reported a discussion near the Saline Township data center on October 2 about local control and siting on farmland. The article described resident worries about loss of agricultural land. These are reported positions, not independently verified land loss, measured effects or new legal restrictions.

Record status: unknown. The present disposition of these reported concerns has not been independently established. Approval, construction and company statements do not establish resolution or measured effects.

Event date: October 2, 2026

Source publication date: October 2, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 19, 2026

October 2 is the date of the event identified in the report and photo caption, not merely a source-check date. The article carries this explicit first publication date. The October 19 source check is separate.

Raised or recorded by Michigan Public Radio Network.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Related Digital and Blackstone planned to preserve open space, farmland and wetlands, Michigan Public reported in April. This earlier reported plan is context for the same campus, not verified conservation or a direct reply to the October 2 discussion.

The published company plan predates the October event and addresses the same land-use topic. It is linked with its April publication date and is not described as a later response.

Response publication date: April 25, 2026

Response sources checked: October 19, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Applied Digital Polaris Forge 1

Recorded event date: October 1, 2026

Applied Digital reported the second phase of Building 2 ready for service; further HPC campus construction continued.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

ir.applieddigital.com

Dated record: Project Cannoli

Recorded event date: October 1, 2026

MPSC conditionally approved DTE and Google electricity contracts in U-22058. Acceptance and other conditions apply; this is a utility-contract milestone, not local siting or construction permission, completed obligations, energized service or operation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

mi-psc.my.site.com

Public concern on the record: Project Cannoli

Michigan Environmental Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club raised questions about projected ratepayer benefits and proposed stronger cost protections for Google's Van Buren Township project, as summarized in the commission's October 1 order. That order also records DTE Electric's arguments for its contractual protections and conditionally approves the contracts. It does not establish actual future bill impacts.

Record status: unknown. The commission issued a conditional contract decision, but the later disposition of these documented cost concerns is unknown. Acceptance, revised contracts, subsequent compliance and actual costs were not verified. The order expressly excludes customers who do not pay power-supply costs, including choice customers, from its prohibition on shifting such costs to other customers.

Event date: October 1, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

October 1, 2026 is when the order records the parties' positions. The individual underlying brief and testimony filing days have not been established in this bounded review. The original order and proof of service are dated October 1, 2026. A first public posting date is not independently established and stays unknown.

Raised or recorded by Michigan Environmental Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and Sierra Club.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Monarch Compute Campus

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection published a public-comment process for Monarch's proposed off-grid power facility under application R14-0042. The notice schedules October 20 and October 29, 2026 meetings, with written comments due October 30. This is a preliminary air-permit review, not an issued permit, completed hearing or measured-air finding.

Record status: pending. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection published a preliminary review and future comment opportunities for R14-0042. Pending applies only to that named air application; no signed final permit, current generation, project operation or resolution of earlier enforcement was verified.

Event date: April 17, 2026

Source publication date: September 29, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original notice expressly identifies April 17, 2026 as the air application date. October 20 and October 29 are scheduled future meetings; they have not been treated as completed events. The original agency notice displays September 29, 2026 publication. That is separate from the earlier application date, future comment deadlines and any later final permit decision.

Raised or recorded by West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Monarch Compute Campus

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection published a joint comment opportunity for Monarch State Waters applications SWP-26-0002 and SWP-26-0003, concerning proposed wetland impacts for two named campus projects. The notice schedules an October 26, 2026 meeting and comment deadline. This counts one paired public-notice process, not two verified buildings or a finding of actual environmental damage.

Record status: pending. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection published a comment opportunity for the paired State Waters applications through October 26, 2026. Pending applies to that process only; mitigation-credit plans do not establish final issuance, completed restoration, actual wetland effects or resolution of separate stormwater enforcement.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 29, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

Exact filing dates for the two State Waters applications were not established in the read notice. October 26, 2026 is a scheduled future workshop, meeting and comment deadline, not an event already held. The original combined agency notice was published September 29, 2026. It distinguishes the State Waters process from separate air meetings and the October 30 air deadline; the publication date is not an application or issuance date.

Raised or recorded by West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Cipher Digital Barber Lake

Recorded event date: September 25, 2026

Cipher announced an amended Barber Lake lease and phased future hall delivery/rent milestones from Q4 2026 through Q1 2027; no actual opening date is established by this announcement.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

investors.cipherdigital.com

Permit and comment: AWS Wheatfield Campus (Project Rise)

Indiana Department of Environmental Management published a draft air-permit notice for Amazon Data Services in Wheatfield. Its later notices schedule a November 10, 2026 hearing following a hearing request and comments, and extend comments through November 16. This documents a pending permit procedure, not an issued permit, completed hearing or finding of measured impacts.

Record status: pending. Indiana Department of Environmental Management published an extended comment period and scheduled a hearing for the named draft air permit. Pending applies only to that process. Comments are extended through November 16, 2026, with a hearing scheduled for November 10. No final decision, completed hearing, current operation or resolution of every concern was verified.

Event date: September 24, 2026

Source publication date: September 24, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original extension notice expressly identifies September 24, 2026 as the initial notice posting. November 10 is a scheduled future hearing, not an event already held. The initial notice was published September 24, 2026, as confirmed by the original extension and current agency row. Exact first posting days for the hearing and extension documents remain unknown; filenames are not publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: September 24, 2026

Deadline extended again to Oct 15 ('no more extensions'); Boyd J-E Chaney says county will wait for Russell

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

News report: Merrimack Station Data Center (proposed, Bow)

New Hampshire Public Radio reported residents' environmental, health and public-information concerns about a possible data center at the former Merrimack Station in Bow. The article also records public support and the town chair's statement that no application had been received at publication. These are reported public positions, not findings about a built facility or a current permit decision.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 23, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

Raised or recorded by New Hampshire Public Radio.

New Hampshire Public Radio

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Nebius Vineland Data Center

NJ Spotlight News reported a state air-permitting penalty alleging unpermitted generators at DataOne's Vineland development, alongside residents' concerns about noise, water, electricity and air quality. The article includes DataOne's different account of temporary generation and planned fuel cells. The original agency record and later outcome were not independently read in this review, so this remains a news report.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of the reported penalty, permit applications and underlying community concerns is unknown in this bounded review. An outlet-reported company intention to apply, temporary generation or future fuel cells is not actual permit issuance, payment, agency withdrawal, current compliance or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 23, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article gives July 29 for a reported inspection, but an independently inspected exact order/penalty issuance date is not established. The item event date stays unknown; a relative Tuesday announcement, reported inspection and article publication remain distinct. The original report displays September 23, 2026 publication. The independently read company project page is undated; neither its capture nor the source-check day becomes a publication or agency action date.

Raised or recorded by NJ Spotlight News.

Company statement reported by an outlet

DataOne stated, according to NJ Spotlight News, that the generators were temporary, that it would apply for air permits and that it was transitioning to fuel cells for permanent power. These are outlet-reported company statements, not independently inspected permits, completed changes or measured noise and emissions.

The original article explicitly attributes the statement to DataOne in the same Vineland air-enforcement reporting. September 23 is the outlet publication, not an independently verified company-original statement date. Nebius's separate undated tenant FAQ supplies exact-site identity and general context, not a DataOne case reply or proof of agency endorsement.

Response publication date: September 23, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Compass Statesville Campus

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality published a notice seeking comments on the Stamey Farm Road / Compass water-quality certification application and proposed effects on streams and wetlands. Its pages list different October 2026 comment deadlines. The announced hearing is not independently verified as held, and the application's later outcome and applicable deadline remain unconfirmed.

Record status: unknown. The current certification disposition and actual hearing outcome are unknown in this bounded review. The reminder gives October 28 for written comments while the event page gives October 27; the applicable deadline is unconfirmed. A prospective notice is not an issued certification, observed stream/wetland impact or resolution of public concerns.

Event date: September 21, 2026

Source publication date: September 21, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

September 21, 2026 is the agency's dated reminder publication/notice event, not the later scheduled hearing. Whether the September 28 hearing actually occurred was not independently verified; future comment deadlines are not accomplished events. The original reminder displays September 21, 2026 publication. First publication of the changing event page is unknown; its August 29 start and October 27 end are scheduled range labels, not independently verified first-posting or disposition days.

Raised or recorded by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Rhea Data Blacks Creek Campus

Boise State Public Radio reported Sierra Club's concerns about water, electricity, wildlife habitat and use of public land for the Rhea Data proposal near Blacks Creek Reservoir. The article also records BLM's account of plans for public input. These are reported concerns and agency statements, not an independently inspected final environmental review, actual resource impacts or a granted project approval. All later permit and public-comment outcomes are unknown in this review.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of the documented concerns and original federal review is unknown in this bounded report review. Anticipated future scoping and promised public input do not establish a completed review, permit approval, resource measurement or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 21, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article reports interviews and a newly reported proposal without one independently verified exact concern filing or hearing day. Monday/Friday references are not converted to guessed event dates; the event remains unknown. The original article displays September 21, 2026 at 3:43 p.m. MDT. Publication is separate from unverified application, interview and future scoping dates.

Raised or recorded by Boise State Public Radio.

Boise State Public Radio

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Serverfarm Covington Data Center (Hazelbrand Road)

Georgia Environmental Protection Division issued air permit 4911-217-0080-S-01-0 for the VoltaGrid prime-power generation component serving ATL2 at 10835 Hazelbrand Road. The signed permit and agency narrative document a conditional air authorization, not verified operation, all local approvals or disposition of earlier construction allegations. The final agency addendum treats the two facilities as one air-permitting source while retaining separate equipment permits; this does not merge Atlas identities.

Record status: resolved. Georgia Environmental Protection Division issued the named air permit. Resolved applies only to this permit action; the outcome of earlier construction allegations, actual operation and present compliance are not established.

Event date: September 18, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: September 18, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The signed original permit cover and current agency registry identify September 18, 2026 as issuance. This is not an opening or all-permit completion date. The current registry labels an issuance date. A first public posting date for this permit or its evolving narrative is not established, so publication stays unknown.

Raised or recorded by Georgia Environmental Protection Division.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Stargate Project Jupiter

Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of Center for Biological Diversity's emergency mandamus petition involving the State Engineer and lifted its August stay. KANW links the case to non-potable groundwater for Project Jupiter construction. This court outcome does not establish measured water impacts, operational cooling demand or resolution of every water concern.

Record status: resolved. Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of the named S-1-SC-41580 mandamus request and lifted its prior stay on September 17, 2026. Resolved applies only to that court procedure. No explanatory environmental merits findings, current permits, operational compliance or outcome of the distinct county cases were independently established.

Event date: September 17, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: September 17, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original September 17, 2026 court filing stamp and signed order establish the decision day for S-1-SC-41580. The prior stay was dated August 23; no petition filing date is invented. The original court PDF first-publication day is unknown. Its signature and court filing dates are decision dates. KANW separately published its report September 23, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Oracle stated, according to KANW, that construction uses non-potable water from an existing water-rights holder for activities such as dust control, with State Engineer oversight. It also described conservation efforts. These are outlet-reported company statements, not independent measurements or a response resolving every water concern.

KANW explicitly presents the Oracle spokesperson statement in its account of the same construction-water dispute. It addresses construction-water use, not every operational water or unrelated county-procedure issue. September 23 is the outlet publication; the original company statement day is unknown.

Response publication date: September 23, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Stargate Project Jupiter

Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of New Energy Economy's mandamus request concerning the Project Jupiter air-permit proceeding and lifted its August stay. The order records that named court procedure without explanatory environmental findings. It does not establish an issued permit, actual emissions, present compliance or resolution of the separate county lawsuits.

Record status: resolved. Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of the named S-1-SC-41579 mandamus request and lifted its prior stay on September 17, 2026. Resolved applies only to that court procedure. No explanatory environmental merits findings, current permits, operational compliance or outcome of the distinct county cases were independently established.

Event date: September 17, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: September 17, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original September 17, 2026 court filing stamp and signed order establish the decision day for S-1-SC-41579. The prior stay was dated August 23; no petition filing date is invented. The original court PDF first-publication day is unknown. Its signature and court filing dates are decision dates. KANW separately published its report September 23, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Servistar Realties Westfield Data Center Campus

Western Mass News reported residents' water, air-quality and health concerns, alongside public support, at a Westfield meeting about Servistar Realties' proposed data center. The report says the developer requested a permit extension. These are outlet accounts, not measured impacts or a verified approval of that request.

Record status: unknown. The present outcome of the documented concerns and permit-extension request is unknown in this bounded review. A reported request does not establish an approved extension, final environmental permits, completed construction or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 15, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report describes a Tuesday-night meeting without an independently inspected original meeting record establishing its exact day. The event date remains unknown; a calendar date is not inferred from the article publication. The original article displays September 15, 2026 at 10:08 p.m. EDT. Its September 16 URL path does not replace the displayed local publication day.

Raised or recorded by Western Mass News.

Western Mass News

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: AWS Scioto Darby Campus

City of Hilliard reported withdrawing its ERAC appeal of the air permit for AEP Ohio's natural-gas fuel cells serving the AWS Scioto Darby campus. The city described a carbon-dioxide modeling review and planned later monitoring while criticizing limited local review. This records the city's account, not a court merits ruling, measured air quality, all-pollutant safety finding or AWS diesel-generator permit.

Record status: withdrawn. City of Hilliard reported withdrawing its own ERAC appeal. This is the city's published account, not a retained commission dismissal order, permit revocation, decision on alleged effects or proof of facility operation.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 15, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The city reports a November 2025 appeal filing and a later withdrawal, but the exact filing and disposition days are not established in the retained announcements. The city release displays September 15, 2026 and the retained original JSON-LD gives that publication day. The identity-context release is dated October 21, 2025. Neither is a substitute for an unverified ERAC filing day.

Raised or recorded by City of Hilliard.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Lea County evaluation

Recorded event date: September 14, 2026

Google publicly announced that it was exploring a potential Lea County, New Mexico data center. Discussions and details remained open; this is not an approval, construction start or opening.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

Public concern on the record: Crusoe Hallam Data Center (Monolith Olive Creek campus)

Residents requested limits on data-center growth and further noise, water and setback rules during Hallam's September 14 board meeting, as recorded in the village minutes. The discussion specifically addressed Monolith and Crusoe's Olive Creek proposal. Later planning minutes record company commitments, while Nebraska Public Media reported a subsequent special-use approval. Those steps do not establish that every concern was resolved.

Record status: unknown. The current outcome of the residents' requested growth limits and underlying concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Tabling the proposed resolution, a planning recommendation, company commitments and later reported permit approval do not establish enacted limits, implemented mitigation, measured conditions or resolution of every concern.

Event date: September 14, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

September 14, 2026 is the original board meeting date. The request was tabled at that meeting. Later recommendations and reported approval remain distinct events; no exact original later signed decision day is inferred. The village PDFs have no independently established first public posting date. Their September meeting dates and October URL folders are not publication dates. Nebraska Public Media published its later approval report October 6, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Crusoe stated, as recorded in the planning minutes, that it would undertake follow-up sound studies and include water-use, lighting and decommissioning commitments in the proposed conditions. These are recorded company commitments, not independently verified operating results or completed mitigation.

The original village minutes record Crusoe's representative discussing changes after community feedback for the same Olive Creek proposal. This is an agency-published account of the company statement, not an operator-authored page. First posting date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Stargate Lighthouse Campus

Wisconsin Public Radio reported water, electricity, noise and transmission-route questions at a September 10, 2026 community event for Port Washington's Lighthouse campus. Earlier reporting described construction-noise, light and traffic complaints and a city-announced hours change. These are outlet accounts, not measured impacts, a formal complaint case or proof that every concern was resolved.

Record status: unknown. The current outcome of the documented resource and construction questions is unknown in this bounded review. A reported hours amendment and developer plans do not establish actual mitigation completion, measured noise or water conditions, current transmission approval or resolution of every concern.

Event date: September 10, 2026

Source publication date: September 11, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The newer report's photo caption expressly identifies September 10, 2026 as the community conversation. This was a company informational event, not a formal agency hearing. The earlier reported hours amendment and its scheduled start are separate events. The original current report was published September 11, 2026 and updated that day; the construction-hours report was published March 20. The original company campus page has no independently established first publication day.

Raised or recorded by Wisconsin Public Radio.

Company-published statement

Vantage Data Centers stated that Lighthouse would use closed-loop cooling and that it plans water restoration, wetland measures and a planted berm for sound mitigation. These are company plans and commitments, not independently verified water use, completed mitigation or permit outcomes.

The original campus page explicitly identifies Port Washington and Lighthouse. Its resource and design statements relate to the reported questions, but it is not an express reply to every construction complaint or an original transmission decision. First publication date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: MARA Granbury Facility

Supreme Court of Texas issued an order denying the petition by MARA Holdings for a writ of mandamus in the proceeding linked to the Granbury nuisance case. The court also dismissed the motion to stay as moot. This procedural order does not decide the truth of the noise allegations or establish that the underlying concern was resolved.

Record status: resolved. Supreme Court of Texas issued a denial of this mandamus petition on September 9, 2026. Resolved describes this procedural item only; it does not mean the nuisance merits or alleged effects have been resolved.

Event date: September 9, 2026

Source publication date: September 9, 2026

Disposition date: September 9, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The orders page and official docket both date this procedural disposition September 9, 2026. The official Supreme Court orders page is dated September 9, 2026. First publication date of the dynamic docket is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Supreme Court of Texas.

Company statement published by an agency or court

MARA Holdings stated in its court-filed reply that the association lacked standing and that mandamus relief should be available. This is the company's legal argument, not a ruling on the nuisance allegations.

The official case 26-0337 docket links this operator reply filed August 3, 2026 to lower-court cause C2024253. The statement precedes the September 9 procedural order and does not answer that later order or resolve the alleged noise impacts. First public-posting date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: St. Joseph County

WVPE reported South Bend council questions about the composition of wastewater from an Amazon data center sent to the city's treatment plant. This records an outlet account of public questions. It does not establish the exact originating campus, contaminant levels, a discharge violation or a current permit outcome.

Record status: unknown. The disposition of the reported water-composition questions is unknown in this bounded review. A proposed transparency bill and historical interview account do not establish a current water-quality result, permit decision, wrongdoing or resolution.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: September 8, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The outlet refers to an August 20 committee meeting and reported later conversations. The exact independently reviewed concern-event day remains unknown because original minutes and a filed utility inquiry were not inspected. The original report displays September 8, 2026 publication. That day is outlet publication, not an independently established discharge event, contamination finding or agency order.

Raised or recorded by WVPE.

WVPE

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: September 4, 2026

Cleveland-Cliffs closing deadline extended from Aug 31 to Sept 25

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Permit and comment: Cook Inlet Subsea-Compute & Infrastructure Hub

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recorded acceptance for filing of the DeepGreen Cook Inlet preliminary-permit application and invited comments through November 2, 2026. The notice concerns study priority for the East Foreland subsea-compute proposal. It does not grant a construction license or authorize land disturbance or entry onto others' property.

Event date: September 1, 2026

Source publication date: September 4, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The event is the exact dated original public record. The displayed original publication day is recorded separately from the event and source check.

Raised or recorded by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Goodman Energy Park Data Center

Communities for a Better Environment and Center for Biological Diversity filed comments disputing separate review of adjacent generator facilities and requesting analysis of cumulative air emissions, energy demand and public health for Goodman Energy Park. The groups' arguments and predictions are not agency findings, verified health effects or an Atlas decision to merge facilities.

Record status: unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date: September 4, 2026

Source publication date: September 4, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Communities for a Better Environment and Center for Biological Diversity.

Company statement published by an agency or court

GIC Vernon LLC filed a response disputing the groups' proposed aggregation of the neighboring generator facilities and their air-quality, public-health and cumulative-operation arguments. The applicant cited its own modeling and permitting interpretation. These are company arguments in a public filing, not an agency ruling or independently verified Atlas conclusions.

The applicant reply expressly identifies the September 4 comment TN272337 and answers it in the Vernon exemption proceeding. Its October 13 body date differs from October 14 docket publication. The response does not establish that separate facilities should be merged in the Atlas.

Response publication date: October 14, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: DataBank Project Indo

Recorded event date: September 3, 2026

Cartersville City Council approved Project Indo Z26-05 rezoning and concurrent variances in separate 6-0 votes, with three conditions and ordinance reference 44-26. Zoning approval does not establish final permits, power availability, construction or operation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net

Dated record: Meta Kuna Data Center

Recorded event date: September 3, 2026

Meta announced its Kuna data center online and serving traffic; this dates the announcement, not an independently observed energization.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

datacenters.atmeta.com

Legal action: Clark County

Interior Board of Land Appeals issued a September 1, 2026 stay of the federal Townsite data-center decision, consolidating Boulder City's and the environmental groups' appeals and expediting further review. The groups raised environmental-review, water, air and habitat concerns. The stay is an interim procedural ruling, not a final merits judgment or measured environmental finding.

Record status: unknown. The current merits disposition is unknown in this bounded review. The September 1 order grants a stay and expedited consolidated review. It denies Boulder City's separate stay motion as moot because the granted stay already provides relief; it does not dismiss the city appeal, finally resolve every concern or establish that the project was withdrawn.

Event date: September 1, 2026

Source publication date: September 1, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The actual signed order is dated September 1, 2026. It separately identifies Boulder City's July 23 appeal and the June 26 federal decision. Earlier group filing and later briefing are separate events; no completed later filing is inferred. The original group stay announcement was published September 1, 2026; its earlier appeal announcement was published July 27. The exact first public posting day of the original order PDF and city page is unknown; the order date is not assumed to be first publication.

Raised or recorded by Interior Board of Land Appeals.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Ridgeline Data Center

Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia dismissed Ridgeline-related appeal 25-ICA-391 on August 26, 2026 for lack of jurisdiction, with a separate discussion of moot draft-permit questions. This records the named court procedure, not a merits decision approving every environmental claim, current operation or the outcome of any later higher-court case.

Record status: dismissed. Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia dismissed only appeal 25-ICA-391 for lack of jurisdiction, with a separate discussion of moot draft-permit questions. Dismissed applies to that dated Intermediate Court procedure. It does not resolve all air-permit or disclosure merits, prove current compliance, dismiss every possible challenge or establish the present higher-court outcome.

Event date: August 26, 2026

Source publication date: August 31, 2026

Disposition date: August 26, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The actual court order and electronic filing stamp both identify August 26, 2026. Earlier appeal-filing dates and any planned later refiling are separate; no accomplished higher-court filing is inferred. The exact original court PDF first posting day is unknown. The original linked WVPB follow-up was published August 31, 2026. A filename or filing stamp is not assumed to establish PDF publication.

Raised or recorded by Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Fundamental Data stated, according to West Virginia Public Broadcasting, that it respects the rulings and would address issues in the proper forum while working with the state. This is an outlet-quoted company statement, not a verified merits determination or completed compliance finding.

The original report attributes this statement to Fundamental Data concerning both Ridgeline rulings. The company release itself was not independently inspected. August 31 is outlet publication, not an independently established company-original publication date.

Response publication date: August 31, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Ridgeline Data Center

Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia dismissed Ridgeline-related appeal 26-ICA-92 on August 26, 2026 for being improvidently docketed, stating that review belongs in the Supreme Court of Appeals. This records the named court procedure, not a merits decision approving every environmental claim, current operation or the outcome of any later higher-court case.

Record status: dismissed. Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia dismissed only appeal 26-ICA-92 for being improvidently docketed, stating that review belongs in the Supreme Court of Appeals. Dismissed applies to that dated Intermediate Court procedure. It does not resolve all air-permit or disclosure merits, prove current compliance, dismiss every possible challenge or establish the present higher-court outcome.

Event date: August 26, 2026

Source publication date: August 31, 2026

Disposition date: August 26, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

Raised or recorded by Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Response publication date: August 31, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Amazon Web Services Richmond County Data Center Campus

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality announced final air permits for Amazon's Hamlet backup engines and Duke Energy's temporary bridge-power engines, with additional testing, monitoring and reporting following public comments. The agency keeps the two permitted activities separate. Its announcement establishes a permit action, not measured emissions, actual campus operation or resolution of every community concern.

Record status: resolved. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality announced issuance of the two named air authorizations. Resolved applies only to that paired permitting action; actual operation, measured emissions, present compliance and the outcome of every community concern are not established.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 28, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The agency announcement says the final permits had been issued, but exact signed issuance days were not independently established. Event date stays unknown; the announcement day and originally scheduled hearing are not substituted. The original final-permit announcement displays August 28, 2026 publication. The undated hearing-event page and current check are separate from an unverified exact permit issuance day.

Raised or recorded by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Buena Vista AI Factory

Central Sierra Broadcasting reported questions about cooling water, fan noise and heat management for the Buena Vista AI Factory proposal near Ione, and truck traffic for its associated biomass power plant. The reporting distinguishes proposed computing from the separate power-plant component; these are reported questions, not measured effects or agency findings.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of these reported concerns is not established by this bounded review.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 21, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

A single exact interview or concern-event day is not established. The two article publication days are not substituted for an event date. Part two displays August 21, 2026; the earlier project/position article displays August 19. These are separate publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Central Sierra Broadcasting.

Company statement reported by an outlet

NewYork GreenCloud described plans for biomass-powered, liquid-cooled computing, according to Central Sierra Broadcasting. These earlier company positions do not establish actual operating effects or measured carbon reductions.

The outlet quoted earlier company promotional statements in its August 19 article, before the August 21 questions. August 19 is the news publication date; an exact statement day and a direct reply to the later questions are not established.

Response publication date: August 19, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Justified Data Campus

Recorded event date: August 21, 2026

Electric-service agreement approval dated August 21, reported in TeraWulf’s August 24 announcement. Up to 482 MW is service capacity, not IT delivery, building approval or operation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

investors.terawulf.com

Public concern on the record: Justified Data Campus

Residents raised concerns about electricity costs, water, noise, pollution, health and wildlife at the July 27, 2026 Hawesville public-comment meeting, as recorded by the Kentucky Public Service Commission. Its later approval addresses the electric-service agreement and requires further filings. That tariff approval does not itself establish measured environmental conditions or resolve every concern.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the documented environmental and nuisance concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The PSC approved the electric-service agreement within its stated rates-and-terms scope. Later company modeling and a demolition monitoring plan are not independent measured compliance, agency adoption of technical conclusions or evidence that every public concern was resolved.

Event date: July 27, 2026

Source publication date: August 21, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original final order expressly records that the public comment meeting occurred July 27, 2026. This is separate from the August 21 order, earlier scheduled meeting locations and later company filing/preparation dates. The actual public docket posts the final order August 21, 2026; the original signed entry page independently gives that day. Later company noise publication August 27 and demolition-air-plan publication September 28 are separately bound to the post-case table.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Justified DataPower / TeraWulf filed a consultant noise assessment on August 27 and a demolition-air monitoring plan on September 28, 2026. The consultant predicts sound within its referenced guidelines and proposes dust monitoring during demolition. These are company-commissioned submissions, not measured operating results or an independent agency finding.

Both actual originals are company-commissioned ERM submissions published in the same PSC post-case file, with the exact Justified/TeraWulf/Hawesville identity. September 28 is the latest selected company filing publication; the noise report was separately public August 27. The demolition-air plan addresses demolition dust and is not relabeled as the requested generator air-modeling analysis or an express answer to every water/power/health concern.

Response publication date: September 28, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Goodman Innovation Centre San Jose (NorthTown Data Center)

Valley Water requested environmental-review analysis of water supply, flooding, shallow groundwater, stormwater and protection of the adjacent Guadalupe River for NorthTown. The agency recommended spill controls and protection of wells. Its comment requests assessment and safeguards; it does not establish a discharge, present contamination caused by the project or a permit violation.

Record status: unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date: August 20, 2026

Source publication date: August 20, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Valley Water.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Goodman Innovation Centre San Jose (NorthTown Data Center)

Center for Biological Diversity filed comments requesting environmental analysis and mitigation for NorthTown, raising generator air emissions, energy demand, water, biological resources, noise and lighting. These are the group's concerns and requests in the exemption proceeding, not agency findings or verified measurements.

Record status: unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date: August 20, 2026

Source publication date: August 20, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Center for Biological Diversity.

Company statement published by an agency or court

GIC San Jose LLC filed a response disputing the group's assumptions about generator operation and environmental effects, and described its own energy, water and biological-resource analysis. The applicant's filing is linked as its position; its cited technical studies are not independently verified Atlas findings.

The applicant filing expressly answers the Center for Biological Diversity letter TN272073. It is not an agency ruling, evidence of a current operating role or a response to the separate Valley Water letter.

Response publication date: September 24, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Google Hermantown Data Center

MPR News reported continuing questions about Google's Hermantown proposal, including noise, water and electricity use, a nearby trout stream and stormwater. It described company presentations and residents' differing reactions. These are reported concerns and plans, not an independently inspected complaint case, measured effects, completed mitigation or final agency approval.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of these documented concerns is unknown in this bounded original-report review. Presented design or cooling options and company mitigation plans do not establish completed work, measured noise or water outcomes, a final permit or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 20, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The reports describe several open houses and relative weekday meetings without one independently verified exact concern-event day for this item. Event date remains unknown; report publication and scheduled later reviews are separate. The current original report displays August 20, 2026 publication,with separate June 25 background reporting. Those days are outlet publication dates,not independently verified company-original,permit or court-event dates.

Raised or recorded by MPR News.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Google stated, according to MPR News, that it was addressing noise, stream and runoff questions in its Hermantown design. The outlet also reported the company considering air cooling or recirculated-water cooling. These are reported company plans, not independently inspected final designs, completed mitigation or measured resource use.

The August 20 report attributes these presentations to Google officials discussing Hermantown. The separate June 25 report supplies the cooling options; neither is a company-original publication or proof of implementation. Pine Island commitments, utility arrangements and events are not transferred to this proposal. August 20 is the later outlet publication day.

Response publication date: August 20, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Manse Technology Campus

Nevada Current reported public water concerns and a Nye County vote restricting data centers in Pahrump's Basin 162, linking the decision to the proposed Manse Technology Campus. This is an attributed report about that basin and proposal, not an independently checked present-day court outcome, a statewide ban or a measured water finding.

Record status: unknown. The current judicial and project outcome and the disposition of the reported water concerns are unknown in this bounded review. The historical basin-restriction report and current developer plans do not establish a final case disposition, site-specific approval or withdrawal, completed mitigation or measured water use.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 20, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article describes a Tuesday commission vote, but an independently inspected exact vote date was not established. The event date remains unknown; the publication date is not substituted. The original report displays August 20, 2026 publication. The current developer page has no independently established first publication date; its source-check day is not a new company statement or project event.

Raised or recorded by Nevada Current.

Company-published statement

Manse Technology Campus stated on its project page that the proposed campus would limit water use and avoid burdens on local infrastructure and services. These are developer plans and commitments, not independently verified water use, approval or completed mitigation.

The original project page expressly identifies the same Manse proposal in Pahrump. It has no verified publication date and does not expressly answer the later reported basin restriction or an inspected court case. The statements are linked as developer context, not evidence that the reported concerns were resolved.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Google Project Skyway (Pine Island)

MPR News reported continued environmental concerns about Google's Pine Island proposal, following earlier questions about noise, light, health, water and electricity. Its later report described opposition at a company event and a court-review-related pause. These are outlet accounts; the original court order, present project outcome and actual environmental conditions were not independently verified.

Record status: unknown. The current formal court and project disposition and the outcome of these documented concerns are unknown in this bounded review. MPR News reported a pause during judicial review in August; that is not an independently inspected current order, final project withdrawal, issued environmental approval or measured resource outcome.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 20, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The newer report describes a Wednesday event but an independently checked exact event day was not established. Event date stays unknown; the earlier scheduled injunction hearing and later reported pause are not original verified court-event dates. The current original two-project report displays August 20, 2026 publication. The separate Pine Island background report is dated February 24. Publication, company-event timing and a court ruling are distinct.

Raised or recorded by MPR News.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Panattoni Burgin Data Center Campus

Kentucky Public Radio reported opposition to Panattoni's Burgin-area proposal at a July 30, 2026 planning hearing and later annexation discussions, including questions about water, electricity and control over farmland development. The report distinguishes a county moratorium from city proceedings. It does not establish current annexation, a final city prohibition, measured impacts or a verified project withdrawal.

Record status: unknown. The later formal annexation, city/county applicability and proposal disposition are unknown in this bounded original-report review. A reported county moratorium or delayed city vote does not establish a permanent city ban, project withdrawal, permit denial or resolution of all resource concerns.

Event date: July 30, 2026

Source publication date: August 17, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original caption and article expressly identify the July 30, 2026 planning hearing/commission action. Other relative Tuesday meetings and later annexation discussion are not converted to unverified exact event dates. The original report displays August 17, 2026 publication, distinct from the July 30 reported hearing and this source check.

Raised or recorded by Kentucky Public Radio.

Kentucky Public Radio

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: IREN Horizon - Childress, TX

Recorded event date: August 13, 2026

IREN announced Horizon 1 delivery to and acceptance by Microsoft. This announcement date does not independently establish first power or a physical opening day.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.sec.gov

Dated record: Muskie Data Campus

Recorded event date: August 5, 2026

Q2 earnings call: CEO Paul Prager says Muskie could expand to as much as 2 GW

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

News report: Meta Hyperion

Louisiana Illuminator reported Sierra Club's objections to the emissions calculations and permit classification for Hyperion, with requests for monitoring and a hearing. The report also includes Meta's differing compliance position. These are outlet-reported concerns and company statements, not independently inspected agency findings or measured operating emissions.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of the reported permit objections, monitoring and hearing requests is unknown in this bounded review. A reported earlier permit revision does not resolve every later objection or establish actual air measurements, current operation or all-permit compliance.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 4, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report refers to comments submitted Thursday, but the original comments are blocked and the exact submission day is not independently verified. No calendar date is inferred from the August4 article. The original Louisiana Illuminator article displays August 4, 2026 publication. That is separate from the unknown original comment submission and later agency outcome dates.

Raised or recorded by Louisiana Illuminator.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Meta stated, according to Louisiana Illuminator, that it works with regulators to comply with air-quality and permitting requirements. This is an outlet-reported company statement, not an independently verified finding that the permit objections were resolved or current emissions meet every requirement.

The original August4 article explicitly presents Meta's spokesperson response when asked about the same Sierra Club permit comments. August4 is outlet publication; the exact original email day is unknown.

Response publication date: August 4, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Louisiana Illuminator

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Cipher Digital Black Pearl

Recorded event date: August 4, 2026

Cipher announced initial Black Pearl HPC capacity delivery during August and rent commencement; remaining halls and phases continued construction. This is the disclosure date, not an exact physical handover day.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

investors.cipherdigital.com

Dated record: Meta El Paso AI Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: July 28, 2026

Meta published an El Paso venture announcement describing construction underway and a forecast 2028 capacity rollout. The date does not establish financial close or construction start.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

about.fb.com

News report: Grant County

The Spokesman-Review reported residents' concerns about backup-generator emissions, water and land affected by transmission expansion associated with Quincy-area data-center growth. The article also describes claimed community benefits and company operating practices. This is area-level reporting, not an independently inspected violation, court disposition, measured exposure or an allegation assigned to every facility.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of these area-level concerns is unknown in this bounded original-report review. Reported historic litigation, one changing air-monitor reading, company practices and agency process descriptions are not independently inspected current violations, procedural outcomes or evidence resolving all concerns.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 26, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article combines several interviews and prior events without one independently verified exact filing or hearing day. The event date remains unknown; article publication is not substituted. The original article displays July 26, 2026 publication and July 27 update/editorial clarification. Publication is retained separately from all event and source-check dates.

Raised or recorded by The Spokesman-Review.

Company statement reported by an outlet

H5 Data Centers stated, according to The Spokesman-Review, that its Quincy facilities use outdoor air when conditions allow and generally run backup generators for testing or outages, coordinating testing locally. These are outlet-reported company practices, not independent measurements or a response for other operators.

The original report attributes these comments to H5 representatives discussing its Quincy facilities. They are linked as that bounded area-level company perspective, not an express answer to every resident concern, an exact-building statement or a county-wide operating role. July 26 is the outlet publication, not an independently verified company-original statement date.

Response publication date: July 26, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

The Spokesman-Review

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: July 23, 2026

Ashland adopts restrictive data center zoning leaving about 20 acres of its Ashland Works portion usable

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

News report: Umatilla County

OPB reported residents' noise, light and traffic concerns near Umatilla-area data centers and modeled possible generator emissions during a regional blackout. Its methodology describes assumptions and revised calculations; Amazon disputed the scenario's likelihood. A later governor letter requests a permitting pause for new or expanded facilities. These records do not establish measured exposure, a violation or closure of existing sites.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the documented nuisance and regional air concerns is unknown in this bounded review. A modeled scenario, company statement or governor's new/expanded-permit pause request does not establish actual outage emissions, independent compliance, implementation for a particular permit or resolution of every existing-site concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 22, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

Interviews and nuisance episodes have no independently established exact event day. The October 9 date belongs to a separate original statewide policy letter, not a nuisance occurrence, outage or site enforcement action. The item event date remains unknown. The investigation and method display July 22, 2026 publication; the investigation was updated July 23. The separate current report is published October 13 and updated October 14. Original governor letter is dated October 9, but its first public PDF posting day is unknown.

Raised or recorded by OPB.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Amazon Web Services stated, according to OPB, that a territory-wide outage would be extraordinarily rare and that its emergency generators protect service during interruptions. The outlet also reports company plans for pollution-controlled equipment at new sites. Those statements are not independent measurements, completed retrofits or a response for every facility.

The original article expressly presents Amazon statements in response to its regional generator investigation. July 22 is the outlet publication, not an independently verified company-original statement day. The same-day method describes revised math and company exchanges; lack of a later math challenge is not endorsement. October policy objections are not relabeled as a specific nuisance reply.

Response publication date: July 22, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Meta Temple Data Center

Recorded event date: July 22, 2026

Meta announced its Temple data center online and serving traffic; this dates the announcement, not an independently observed energization.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

datacenters.atmeta.com

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: July 21, 2026

Rubix town hall in Russell: 55 million dollars Cleveland-Cliffs purchase agreement; asks city to lift moratorium by Aug 31

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Hut 8 Beacon Point AI Campus

Recorded event date: July 20, 2026

Hut 8 announced Beacon Point Phase 2, reporting a second 352 MW IT lease and 704 MW contracted IT across the campus. This is not a commissioning event.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.hut8.com

Scheduled date: Stak Energy North Slope Data Center

Scheduled date: July 17, 2026

Scheduled deadline: Alaska DNR extended the STAK preliminary lease comment deadline to 4:30 p.m. Alaska Daylight Time; a final decision is not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

aws.state.ak.us

News report: Project Tango AI Data Center Campus

WLRN Public Media reported residents' concerns about water, noise, electric costs and land-use compatibility at Project Tango. Its July report describes denial of an expansion, and its October follow-up explains that earlier approvals and a possible future application remain distinct. This records the outlet's account, not verified technical effects, an independently inspected county order or the resolution of every concern.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the documented environmental concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The outlet-reported expansion denial is distinct from earlier approvals and possible future applications, and does not establish measured harm, safety, present compliance or resolution of each concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 16, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The initial report describes the county hearing and vote in relative terms. This item does not substitute its publication day for an independently checked exact meeting or filing day. The original report displays July 16, 2026 publication; the distinct follow-up displays October 1, 2026. These outlet dates do not establish an original county-order or company-statement publication day.

Raised or recorded by WLRN Public Media.

Company statement reported by an outlet

PBA Holdings stated, according to WLRN Public Media's October 1 report, that the project had followed transparency requirements and that it would continue working with the county and stakeholders to address concerns and pursue a path forward. This is an outlet-reported company position.

The later article explicitly attributes this same-project statement to PBA Holdings' project manager. October 1 is the outlet publication date, not an independently established original company-statement day; no separately inspected original company response is claimed.

Response publication date: October 1, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Muskie Data Campus

Recorded event date: July 14, 2026

Greenup County moratorium adopted, exempting industrial parks/EastPark; Boyd County follows 2026-07-21 with EastPark exemption

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Public concern on the record: Meta Hyperion

Union of Concerned Scientists requested disclosure of evidence supporting Hyperion's projected power needs and economic claims, citing potential ratepayer consequences. Its July release described a disclosure order; Louisiana Illuminator later reported Meta's appeal. These are attributed accounts, not an independently inspected current order, actual bill result or final commission decision.

Record status: unknown. The current original commission disposition is unknown in this bounded review. The July disclosure order and later appeal are attributed source accounts; a scheduled vote is not a completed decision. No actual current disclosure compliance, final infrastructure approval or ratepayer impact was verified.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 14, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The July release refers to a Friday order without an independently inspected original order establishing its exact day. Later outlet-reported appeal filing and scheduled vote days are not guessed from publication. The original UCS release is dated July 14, 2026. Louisiana Illuminator separately published the appeal account August 11; neither is substituted for an unknown original order or filing date.

Raised or recorded by Union of Concerned Scientists.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Meta argued, according to Louisiana Illuminator, that the requested information was commercially sensitive and appealed the disclosure ruling. This is the outlet's account of the company's position, not a verified final commission outcome or independent finding about customer costs.

The original August11 article expressly presents Meta's confidentiality argument and appeal in the same Hyperion disclosure dispute. August11 is the outlet publication, not an independently verified original company statement or appeal filing day.

Response publication date: August 11, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Regulator record: Monarch Compute Campus

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection announced a unilateral enforcement order after stormwater inspections at Monarch Cloud Campus. The agency recorded sediment-control deficiencies, required corrective work and restricted land disturbance in a separate drainage area. These are the agency's published findings and directions; current corrective completion and the later enforcement outcome were not verified.

Record status: unknown. The current enforcement disposition is unknown in this bounded review. The agency announced required corrective work and a restriction limited to a separate drainage area. Its release does not verify that all corrections were completed, that work resumed, that the whole campus closed or that later air and wetland applications resolved this enforcement matter.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 14, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The July 14, 2026 agency announcement says an order had been issued but does not provide its exact issuance day. July 11 is the reported rainfall event, not an assumed order date. The event date therefore remains unknown. The original agency release displays July 14, 2026 publication. Independent original reporting was published July 15. Those days are separate from the unknown exact order issuance date and any later corrective-action verification.

Raised or recorded by West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: RB Inyokern Data Center

Indian Wells Valley Domestic Well Owner's Association filed an objection to the RB Inyokern exemption application, raising water-supply, waste-heat, noise, night-lighting and electromagnetic-interference concerns and requesting a comprehensive environmental review. These are the association's concerns, not verified measurements, agency findings or independently confirmed statements from the Navy.

Record status: unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date: July 13, 2026

Source publication date: July 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The agency wrapper records submission and docket filing on July 13, 2026. The attached association letter is dated July 11; that letter date is not substituted for the recorded filing day. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Indian Wells Valley Domestic Well Owner's Association.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: QTS Bessemer (Project Marvel)

Southern Environmental Law Center questioned Project Marvel's public-records transparency and potential water, power, air, noise and wildlife impacts. The group reported obtaining a non-disclosure agreement after threatening litigation. These are the group's account and concerns, not a court ruling, an independently inspected filed lawsuit or measured harm.

Record status: unknown. The current public-records and underlying environmental-concern outcomes are unknown in this bounded review. The group's account of receiving an agreement does not establish a court finding, complete disclosure, permit outcome or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The release does not establish an exact document-production or litigation filing day. The date remains unknown; a threat to sue is not treated as an accomplished court filing. The original group release is dated July 13, 2026. It is publication of the group's position, not a verified original agreement execution or production day.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

Southern Environmental Law Center

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Meta Hyperion

Recorded event date: July 13, 2026

Meta announced an expansion of its Richland Parish/Hyperion project, describing 5 GW of future compute capacity. The release is not a first-power or operating milestone.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

datacenters.atmeta.com

Dated record: Rubix Ashland Works Data Center Campus (also listed as Rubix Russell Campus)

Recorded event date: July 10, 2026

Mayor's letter to community discloses Rubix proposal and Q&A

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Public concern on the record: Meta Cheyenne Data Center

U.S. Representative Harriet Hageman requested information from Meta about a reported Cheyenne reclaimed-water incident, contractor discharges and public communication. The utility's separate advisory described an unnamed industrial discharge source. These are documented questions and source accounts, not Atlas findings of causation, drinking-water contamination or a final case outcome.

Record status: unknown. The current outcome of the information request and underlying discharge dispute is unknown in this bounded review. Company challenges, requested hearing or refund and scheduled reuse-irrigation resumption do not establish a final ruling, individual permit reinstatement, measured health impact or resolution of every concern.

Event date: July 9, 2026

Source publication date: July 9, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original signed letter is dated July 9, 2026 and the official release reports the request that day. Earlier incident and permit actions have separate dates; no exact appeal filing or later disposition day is inferred. The official release is published July 9, 2026. First public posting of the signed letter is unknown. WyoFile published the later company-position report July 20; that day is not the original appeal publication or filing day.

Raised or recorded by U.S. Representative Harriet Hageman.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Meta disputed the causal and procedural basis of the utility action and requested a hearing and refund, according to WyoFile. These are reported company arguments, not a ruling, independently verified testing or resolution of the dispute.

The original report concerns the same Cheyenne discharge incident. It presents Meta's appeal arguments and spokesperson statement, not an express response to every question in the congressional letter. July 20 is outlet publication; the original appeal was not inspected.

Response publication date: July 20, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Serverfarm Covington Data Center (Hazelbrand Road)

Georgia Public Broadcasting reported that Georgia EPD warned VoltaGrid about likely air-rule violations and a construction pause at the generation project serving Serverfarm in Covington. This is the outlet's account of the warning and a historical response deadline. The original agency letter and later enforcement outcome were not independently verified in this review.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of this documented concern has not been established by the bounded source review. A related permit issuance does not by itself resolve an earlier allegation.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 7, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article describes a later agency letter but does not give its exact day in the body. The event date remains unknown; a linked filename is not an independently reviewed letter date. The original article displays July 7, 2026 publication and July 8 update. Publication stays July 7, separate from the unknown agency event day and October source check.

Raised or recorded by Georgia Public Broadcasting.

Georgia Public Broadcasting

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Galaxy Helios Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: July 6, 2026

Galaxy announced delivery of Helios Phase I to CoreWeave; this is the announcement date, not an independently established physical completion day.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.galaxy.com

Dated record: Justified Data Campus

Recorded event date: July 6, 2026

TeraWulf announced an Anthropic lease for approximately 401 MW critical IT at Justified. Initial second-half-2027 and full early-2028 delivery are future targets.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

investors.terawulf.com

News report: Microsoft Mount Pleasant Data Center Campus

Wisconsin Public Radio reported a lawsuit alleging noise at Microsoft's Fairwater facility in Mount Pleasant, alongside separate construction-dust, light and traffic concerns elsewhere on the campus. This is an outlet report of allegations and community questions, not an independently inspected court filing, measured impacts or a current compliance finding.

Record status: unknown. The present lawsuit disposition and outcome of the documented concerns are unknown in this bounded review. Microsoft's statements about mitigation and ordinance compliance are company positions, not independently checked measurements, a final case decision or resolution of all campus construction concerns.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 2, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report describes a Wednesday lawsuit filing but no independently inspected original complaint or exact filing date was established in this bounded review. Event date remains unknown; a day was not inferred from the publication calendar. The original WPR report was published July 2, 2026. The selected company update is explicitly dated July 20; earlier June 18 and April updates are separate statements. The exact first creation date of the changing company page is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Wisconsin Public Radio.

Company-published statement

Microsoft stated in its July 20 update that sound evaluation, short-term mitigation and monitoring were continuing, with additional sound-reduction measures under evaluation. These are company reports, not an independently verified noise result, current compliance determination or final lawsuit outcome.

The original dated update concerns Mount Pleasant Fairwater 1 and the reported humming sound. It is later than the WPR report, but it does not expressly answer every lawsuit allegation or the separate construction-dust, light and traffic questions elsewhere on the campus.

Response publication date: July 20, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Prince William Digital Gateway

American Battlefield Trust reported that QTS withdrew its remaining Supreme Court appeal in the Digital Gateway rezoning dispute. The earlier Court of Appeals opinion affirmed invalidation of the Compass, Digital Gateway North and Digital Gateway South rezonings for public-notice defects. This entry records the appeal and its reported withdrawal, not an environmental finding.

Record status: withdrawn. American Battlefield Trust reported QTS's withdrawal of its remaining Supreme Court appeal on July 2, 2026. This disposition describes that appeal, not every possible future proposal or an Atlas finding about environmental effects.

Event date: July 2, 2026

Source publication date: July 2, 2026

Disposition date: July 2, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The party release reports the withdrawal on July 2, 2026; the earlier court opinion is dated March 31, 2026. The original party release is dated July 2, 2026. The linked outlet response account is dated July 3.

Raised or recorded by American Battlefield Trust.

Company statement reported by an outlet

QTS stated, in a statement reported by Potomac Local News, that it would terminate the Digital Gateway project and wind down its work after withdrawing its appeal. The outlet also reported the company citing its expected investment, jobs and tax benefits.

The outlet reports the QTS statement on the same July 2 appeal withdrawal. This is reported company speech, not a company-hosted original or a statement for Compass.

Response publication date: July 3, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Serverfarm Covington Data Center (Hazelbrand Road)

Southern Environmental Law Center requested an investigation and enforcement action concerning alleged construction before air permits at VoltaGrid and the adjacent Serverfarm ATL2 development, on behalf of itself, Sustainable Newton and Altamaha Riverkeeper. This records the groups' allegations and request, not an agency finding, filed lawsuit or verified present compliance outcome.

Event date: June 25, 2026

Source publication date: July 1, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The published letter is dated June 25, 2026. The actual delivery or agency receipt day is not independently established. The organization release is dated July 1, 2026 and links the letter. A first public posting day for the PDF itself is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Serverfarm Covington Data Center (Hazelbrand Road)

Georgia Environmental Protection Division issued air permit 7374-217-0079-S-01-0 for the ATL2 data center emergency generators at 10835 Hazelbrand Road. The signed permit and agency narrative document a conditional air authorization, not verified operation, all local approvals or disposition of earlier construction allegations. The narrative records Sierra Club comments about generator controls and grid planning, alongside the agency's responses.

Event date: June 29, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: June 29, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The signed original permit cover and current agency registry identify June 29, 2026 as issuance. This is not an opening or all-permit completion date. The current registry labels an issuance date. A first public posting date for this permit or its evolving narrative is not established, so publication stays unknown.

Raised or recorded by Georgia Environmental Protection Division.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Archer Datacenter Faribault

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy reported its challenge to Faribault's environmental review of the Archer proposal, raising questions about noise, generator emissions, electricity and water. The city records a June 8, 2026 appellate return for more information or an environmental impact statement and a later supplemental-review extension. These source accounts do not establish measured impacts or a final project approval.

Record status: unknown. The present disposition of the full challenge and underlying concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The city records the June 8 procedural return and a July 14 extension through March 31, 2027 for supplemental review. That account does not establish a final supplemental determination, an ordered full impact statement, current project approval or resolution of every concern.

Event date: June 8, 2026

Source publication date: June 29, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original city chronology and litigant update both identify June 8, 2026 as the appellate ruling date. The exact earlier appeal-filing day was not independently established; the outcome event is separate from the later update publication. The original litigant case update displays June 29, 2026 publication. The changing city project page has no independently established first publication day; its dated actions are not page-publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Scrubgrass Generating Plant

Recorded event date: June 29, 2026

Keel’s second-quarter filing reports that Bitcoin mining at Scrubgrass ceased on June 29, 2026 while energy sales continued. This closes the mining activity, not the entire power site; future HPC/AI development is separate.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

ir.keelinfra.com

Public concern on the record: CENTRA RNO2 (Keystone Data Center)

Third Act Nevada reported that it joined Water Over Data Alliance in raising questions about the Keystone project's cooling design, electricity, generator air, noise, construction hours and heat. Reno later published answers to project questions. These are documented group concerns and city responses, not independently established violations or measured impacts.

Record status: unknown. The present disposition of the documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The city published answers and described planned noise controls and review procedures; those accounts do not establish that all questions were resolved, actual operating measurements or a final determination on every allegation.

Event date: June 25, 2026

Source publication date: June 26, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original group article expressly identifies June 25, 2026 as its joint action with Water Over Data Alliance. This is separate from earlier permit approval and later city FAQ updates. The original group article displays June 26, 2026 publication. The city PDF is updated July 28 with earlier dated additions, but its exact first publication date is unknown; update labels and URL timestamps are not first posting dates.

Raised or recorded by Third Act Nevada.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: NorthMark Strategies Spartanburg High-Performance Computing Center

South Carolina Department of Environmental Services announced a June 25 public hearing and availability session for Valara's compute-center proposal. SC Daily Gazette subsequently reported residents' air and generator-noise questions about the NorthMark/Valara development. These records document a comment process, not measured emissions, present compliance or a verified final permit outcome.

Record status: unknown. The present original permit and appeal outcomes are unknown in this bounded review. Southern Environmental Law Center reported subsequent permit approval and an October 16 appeal. The original signed permit and court docket were not inspected; that party account is not a final judicial ruling or resolution of every concern.

Event date: June 25, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The agency explicitly schedules June 25, 2026 and the June 26 original report describes the hearing as having occurred. The hearing date is separate from an application, final permit or later utility proceeding. The event page has no independently established first publication day. June 25 is the hearing date; June 26 is publication of the separate outlet report, not an issued permit day.

Raised or recorded by South Carolina Department of Environmental Services.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Jackson County Campus

Recorded event date: June 15, 2026

Google announced an expansion investment for its existing Jackson County campus; this was an announcement, not completion of the expansion.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

Dated record: Red Oak Campus

Recorded event date: June 15, 2026

DataBank announced a $650 million Red Oak construction-financing upsize to a $2.65 billion campus package, separate from an $800 million corporate revolver. This dated financing announcement is not project expenditure, an opening or an independently verified loan-instrument review.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.databank.com

Legal action: DeSoto County

Residents filed a federal complaint alleging noise, vibration and nuisance impacts from the Southaven power plant serving xAI facilities. They requested damages and injunctive relief. The complaint concerns the generating plant, separate from nearby data-center buildings; these are allegations and requests, not court findings or awarded relief.

Record status: unknown. The current court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. The proposed class is not independently verified as certified; requested damages and injunction are not awarded relief. Company accounts of partial motions or dismissal of one party do not establish dismissal of the whole case.

Event date: June 8, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original document 1 court stamp and dated signature both identify June 8, 2026. That is the complaint filing date, separate from the unknown later disposition. First public posting of the filed complaint and undated company letter is unknown. Mississippi Free Press published the later article September 25, 2026; that day is not substituted for company-letter publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company-published statement

MZX Tech denied the allegations in its published notice about the lawsuit. This is the company's position, not a court ruling, verified noise measurement or resolution of the residents' claims.

The original company notice explicitly describes the same numbered Southaven noise case and alleged plant impacts. It is undated; later outlet publication does not establish its original publication day.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Meitner Energy Center

Recorded event date: June 4, 2026

Google and Intersect announced construction of the Meitner Energy Center, including a data center and separate co-located generation in Gray and Roberts Counties. Announcement date; exact physical construction-start and energization dates are not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

News report: Microsoft Granger Data Center

WVPE reported dust, construction-truck and backup-generator questions about Microsoft's Granger project, following earlier reporting on electricity rates and reliability. It described county officials' monitoring and dust-control accounts. These are attributed reports and plans, not independently measured conditions, a published formal complaint case or a resolved compliance finding.

Record status: unknown. The later outcome of the documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. County monitoring accounts and company plans do not establish measured air conditions, completed mitigation, the outcome of individual complaints or current compliance.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: May 30, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The reports describe several panel and county meetings. A single independently checked exact concern-event day is not established for this combined report item. The company separately identifies a May 19, 2026 open house, not a formal agency hearing. The later original WVPE report was published May 30, 2026; background reporting was published February 19. The company recap was first published May 20, separate from its May 19 meeting. The exact first publication day of the linked company PDF remains unknown.

Raised or recorded by WVPE.

Company-published statement

Microsoft stated in its community materials that it plans to cover infrastructure costs, coordinate water supply and obtain applicable generator permits. The materials describe planned cooling and design measures. These are company commitments and plans, not independently verified permits, achieved mitigation or measured resource use.

The original company recap links these materials from its May 19, 2026 St. Joseph County meeting, and their site context matches Granger. They precede the May 30 construction report and are not an express answer to its dust or truck-route accounts. The exact first PDF posting date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Project Spade Campus

Recorded event date: May 20, 2026

Missouri’s governor reported Google’s New Florence infrastructure/data-center investment announcement. Announced development and future jobs; exact construction-start, completion and opening dates are not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

governor.mo.gov

News report: Hanton City Business Park (data center anchor)

Ocean State Media reported residents' noise, water, conservation-land and quality-of-life concerns about the Hanton City proposal at Smithfield's May 5, 2026 meeting. It reported different developer and town views on how zoning would apply after the local ordinance change. The underlying application, ordinance and later court outcome were not independently reviewed; the article does not establish a denied or permanently cancelled project.

Event date: May 5, 2026

Source publication date: May 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The event is the exact dated original public record. The displayed original publication day is recorded separately from the event and source check.

Raised or recorded by Ocean State Media.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Hanton City Investments stated through counsel, as reported by Ocean State Media, that the filing preceded the ordinance's effective date and that the proposal was allowed under the earlier zoning. This is the reported legal position, not a court ruling or an environmental mitigation response.

Company counsel zoning position in the same original article; not a response addressing every environmental concern.

Response publication date: May 13, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Ocean State Media

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Beale Infrastructure Gardner Campus

Johnson County Post via KCUR reported residents raised water, noise, air and property-value concerns about Beale Infrastructure's Gardner proposal. The outlet reported that the company withdrew the application after the city said it would provide no incentives. The nearby De Soto and Spring Hill projects are separate.

Record status: withdrawn. Johnson County Post via KCUR reported withdrawal of this Gardner application. The City of Gardner separately reported the withdrawal in a statement published May 6, 2026. These sources do not establish that every concern was resolved or that future proposals are barred.

Event date: May 4, 2026

Source publication date: May 7, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article explicitly identifies the council meeting date; it is not the source-check date. The original news article displays May 7, 2026 as publication. The separate city statement displays May 6, 2026. These are publication dates, not an inferred withdrawal-action day.

Raised or recorded by Johnson County Post via KCUR.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Beale Infrastructure stated, as reported by Johnson County Post via KCUR, that it would not proceed with the Gardner project at that time and appreciated community and city input.

Company statement quoted by the reporting outlet about the same Gardner application; no original withdrawal letter is independently verified.

Response publication date: May 7, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Project Blue

Arizona Public Media reported that Tucson revoked a contractor's temporary construction-water meter used for Project Blue dust control, while Beale Infrastructure described the permit as following normal procedures and said it was seeking another source. The outlet later reported separate groundwater-well authorizations. These accounts concern different water arrangements, not an independently inspected violation, final project closure or measured water use.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the reported construction-water dispute is unknown in this bounded review. Separate groundwater authorizations, company procedural statements and continued project activity do not establish that every water concern was resolved, a violation was adjudicated, credits were transferred or actual water use was measured.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: May 6, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The first outlet report describes a May 4 city letter, but the exact day the construction meter was actually revoked is not independently established. The event date stays unknown; a reported letter, article date and check date are separate. The original reports display May 6 and May 28, 2026 publication with same-day modifications. The item retains the initial May 6 reporting day; later context and this source check are not a filing, revocation or current compliance date.

Raised or recorded by Arizona Public Media.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Beale Infrastructure stated, according to Arizona Public Media, that its contractor followed normal temporary-water permit procedures and that it was procuring alternative construction water. This is the outlet's account of a company statement, not an independently inspected permit, completed alternative supply or agency endorsement.

The original article expressly presents Beale's emailed statement in the same Project Blue temporary-construction-water dispute. May 6 is the article publication, not an independently verified company-original statement date. The May 28 reported groundwater arrangements are a separate source context, not proof that this specific dispute ended.

Response publication date: May 6, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Metrobloks Martindale-Brightwood Data Center

WFYI Public Media reported that residents questioned noise, water use and power demand associated with the Metrobloks proposal in Martindale-Brightwood as the city council approved its rezoning request on May 4, 2026. This news report does not establish construction or the outcome of those concerns.

Record status: unknown. The outcome of the reported concerns is not established by this bounded source review.

Event date: May 4, 2026

Source publication date: May 4, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article explicitly identifies the council meeting date; it is not the source-check date. The original article displays this publication date and local time.

Raised or recorded by WFYI Public Media.

Company-published statement

Metrobloks stated in its undated project FAQ that closed-loop cooling, utility arrangements and noise controls would limit effects. These are company positions about the proposed development, not verified operating measurements.

Same-project FAQ addressing the reported topics; no publication date or dated direct reply to the WFYI article is established.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Stargate The Barn Campus

Michigan Public reported concerns about energy demand, environmental impacts and transparency at the Saline Township campus being developed for Oracle. The report described the legal challenge brought by the state attorney general to the electricity contracts and included differing company assurances. It does not establish a later court outcome, actual customer bill changes or measured environmental effects.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: April 25, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 19, 2026

The exact date on which the described opponents raised each concern is not established. Article publication is not substituted for that event date. The article carries this explicit first publication date. The October 19 source check is separate.

Raised or recorded by Michigan Public.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Related Digital and Blackstone said the project would benefit existing electricity customers and that Oracle would fund its battery storage, according to Michigan Public. These reported assurances are not verified customer savings or an answer establishing the outcome of the legal challenge.

The article includes the companies cost-protection position beside the reported power and transparency concerns. This is the outlet-reported statement as published in April, not an October company update.

Response publication date: April 25, 2026

Response sources checked: October 19, 2026

Michigan Public

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: CyrusOne CHI1-CHI3 (Aurora)

City of Aurora acknowledged noise complaints concerning CyrusOne in an update about scheduled electrical maintenance and daytime generator use. The city described ongoing work toward a solution. This public update does not publish individual complaint files or a count, and it does not establish an adjudicated noise violation.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the city-recorded noise concerns is unknown. The company reports mitigation progress, but no independently verified complaint resolution or measured compliance outcome was established in this bounded review.

Event date: April 23, 2026

Source publication date: April 23, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The event date records the dated city update, not the unknown first complaint or a complaint filing day. The city page displays April 23, 2026. The later company statement is separately dated October 9.

Raised or recorded by City of Aurora.

Company-published statement

CyrusOne reported that previously scheduled sound-mitigation work at Buildings 2 and 3 was complete and that additional sound-attenuation measures at Building 3 were continuing. This is the company's dated progress statement, not an independent sound measurement or a verified complaint outcome.

The October 9 company update addresses mitigation at the same Aurora campus and provides later context for the recorded noise concerns. It is not presented as an express reply to the city's April 23 article or proof that every complaint is resolved.

Response publication date: October 9, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: EdgeCore AS01 Sterling project

Recorded event date: April 21, 2026

EdgeCore announced combined AS01/AS02 construction financing. The $1.5 billion loan envelope is not an individual-site investment or a construction-start/opening day. Initial occupancy remained a future target.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

edgecore.com

Dated record: EdgeCore AS02 Sterling project

Recorded event date: April 21, 2026

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

edgecore.com

Permit and comment: Meta Eagle Mountain Data Center Campus

Utah Division of Air Quality lists air-permit application N159410011 for Stadion LLC at the Eagle Mountain data-center campus, received April 10, 2026. Its public row shows draft permitting documents under review, with a separate August 7 update field. This is an application-review record, not an issued permit, an inspection finding or verification of operation or compliance.

Record status: pending. Utah Division of Air Quality currently lists draft permitting documents under review for the named application. Pending applies only to that listed review step; an issued permit, later original determination, actual operation and present air compliance have not been established in this bounded review. The exact day this draft-review step began is unknown; the August 7 update field is not substituted for a transition day.

Event date: April 10, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The agency table labels April 10, 2026 as NOI received. This is an application-receipt event, not a hearing, public comment, issuance, startup or violation date. No first public posting day for the changing agency table or application is established. Its most-recent-update field is not substituted for a publication date.

Raised or recorded by Utah Division of Air Quality.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Vernon LA Campus (with Goodman Group)

Recorded event date: April 7, 2026

DataBank announced its Vernon joint venture with Goodman and prospective capacity delivery from December 2026 through September 2027. This is an announcement, not completed opening, energization or financial close.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.databank.com

Dated record: Edged Mesa Data Center

Recorded event date: April 1, 2026

Operator reported opening: April 2 release explicitly describes the unveiling as yesterday; independent commissioning and all halls are not certified.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Edged US

News report: Morrow County

Oregon Capital Chronicle reported an Amazon settlement announcement over regional groundwater allegations, alongside the company's denial and no admission of liability. Later OPB reporting described court approval as pending at that time. This county-level news context does not establish present final approval, payment, causation, completed remediation or responsibility at an individual data-center campus.

Record status: unknown. The present final approval, payment and remedial outcome are unknown in this bounded review. OPB reported approval pending in August; an announced settlement or reported preliminary-approval lead does not establish final court approval, actual disbursement, admitted liability or resolution of all regional groundwater concerns.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 31, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article reports a settlement announcement but the original signed execution, filing or actual approval date was not independently established. The event date stays unknown; publication and a relative Tuesday reference are not substituted for a verified court event. The original Oregon Capital Chronicle report displays March 31, 2026 publication with later same-day company/group updates. The independently read OPB follow-up is published August 12, not its August 13 syndication. Source checks are separate from all execution, court and payment dates.

Raised or recorded by Oregon Capital Chronicle.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Amazon Data Services stated, according to Oregon Capital Chronicle, that it denied contributing to the groundwater problem and chose to settle to avoid extended litigation and focus on community support. The report describes no admission of liability. This is an outlet-reported statement, not a court finding or verified completed remedy.

The original March 31 report explicitly attributes the statement to an Amazon spokesperson in the same reported settlement discussion; its update note records the company reply later that same day. March 31 is outlet publication, not an independently reviewed company-original statement/execution day. Other defendants and separate farm settlements are not attributed to Amazon.

Response publication date: March 31, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Hyperscale Data Dowagiac Campus

WWMT reported that residents raised noise and property-value concerns near Hyperscale Data's Dowagiac campus as the company discussed expansion. The article also described city noise-rule and development-proposal discussions; this report does not establish a violation or current case outcome.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of the reported concerns is not established by this bounded source review.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 31, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

A single dated concern event is not established by the article. Its publication date is not substituted for an event day. The original WWMT article identifies March 31, 2026 as publication and April 1 as an update; the update is not a new event or first publication.

Raised or recorded by WWMT.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Hyperscale Data stated in its letter dated October 6, 2026 that it had ended cryptocurrency mining in early September and expected a temporary restart on October 7 for sound testing it described as court-ordered. These are company statements; actual testing results and present operation are not independently verified.

The City of Dowagiac published this original same-facility company letter, dated months after the WWMT article. Its first online publication date and a direct reply to the article are not established. The letter date is distinct from a publication date; the court order was not inspected.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Project Atlas at Coweta

Tulsa Flyer reported water and electricity concerns about Coweta's Project Atlas and Beale Infrastructure's March 30, 2026 announcement that it was withdrawing the proposal. The report attributes the withdrawal to company statements and a city account. It does not establish measured environmental conditions or that every underlying concern was resolved.

Record status: withdrawn. Tulsa Flyer reported that Beale announced withdrawal of the Coweta proposal on March 30, 2026, with the city separately acknowledging notification that day. Withdrawn applies only to that reported proposal; it is not a water-quality finding, resolution of every concern or a permanent ban on future projects.

Event date: March 30, 2026

Source publication date: March 30, 2026

Disposition date: March 30, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The March 30, 2026 original report records the company withdrawal announcement and the city's same-day account of notification. This is a reported announcement date, not an independently inspected signed zoning-withdrawal instrument. The original Tulsa Flyer report displays March 30, 2026 publication and same-day update. That is outlet publication, not a separately verified company-original statement publication day.

Raised or recorded by Tulsa Flyer.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Beale Infrastructure stated, according to Tulsa Flyer, that it was withdrawing its Coweta proposal while continuing other Oklahoma investments. The statement does not give a specific reason or establish an environmental outcome.

The original report quotes Beale about this same Coweta proposal. This is a news-quoted statement, not an independently inspected company-original release or signed withdrawal instrument. March 30 is the outlet publication date.

Response publication date: March 30, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Tulsa Flyer

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Simple Mining Cedar Falls (rezoning defeated)

Iowa Public Radio reported residents' concerns about noise, water and electricity use, nearby habitat and property values around Simple Mining's proposed Cedar Falls location. The article distinguishes that proposal from the utility's Viking power plant. Its announced later discussion is not proof of a final rezoning outcome, measured effects or present mine operation.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the documented concerns and proposed rezoning is unknown in this bounded original-article review. An inherited title or a scheduled later discussion does not establish a final vote, current operation, measured noise or resolution of each concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 26, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article reports an earlier rezoning discussion but does not establish its exact day in the bounded source. The event date stays unknown; planned April dates are not accomplished events. The original report displays March 26, 2026 publication, separate from the unknown exact discussion date and this source check.

Raised or recorded by Iowa Public Radio.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Simple Mining stated, according to Iowa Public Radio, that it had worked with the city on larger, slower fans intended to reduce noise and offered tours. This is the outlet's account of the company position, not an independently inspected design, measured sound level or verified mitigation outcome.

The original article explicitly attributes this noise-design statement to Simple Mining in the same proposed-site discussion. March 26 is the outlet publication day, not an independently verified company-original date. Utility statements about closed-loop water and no wells belong to the separate power plant and are not assigned to this mine.

Response publication date: March 26, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Iowa Public Radio

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Google Palo Data Center Campus

Iowa Public Radio reported residents' questions about water, electricity, traffic, lighting and noise at a town hall concerning Google's Palo proposal. The report describes differing county and mayor positions on local review and annexation. Those positions do not establish corporate motives, the applicable final rules, completed annexation, a permit outcome or measured impacts.

Record status: unknown. The later outcome of these documented questions is unknown in this bounded review. Mayor or county statements and requests for further detail do not resolve actual resource impacts, legal jurisdiction, permit conditions or current project status.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 25, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The March report describes a Tuesday town hall without an independently checked exact meeting day. The event date remains unknown; the publication day is not substituted. The original town-hall report displays March 25, 2026, with separate March 4 background reporting. Article updates and source checks do not establish a meeting or permit date.

Raised or recorded by Iowa Public Radio.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Project Cannoli

Recorded event date: March 17, 2026

Google announced a Michigan data-center/energy collaboration and said it was evaluating Van Buren Township. The later county statement identifies Cannoli; the date is not final-plan approval, site-work commencement or 2700 MW of site IT capacity.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

News report: Atlas Power Data Center (Williston)

KFYR reported progress on individual settlement agreements following residents' noise and property-value allegations concerning Atlas Power near Williston. The outlet recorded company counsel's account of finalized and still-negotiated agreements. The original settlement and current court disposition were not independently reviewed, and the report does not establish measured noise abatement or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

Raised or recorded by KFYR.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Atlas Power counsel stated, as reported by KFYR, that some individual agreements were finalized and others were still being negotiated. The confidential settlement itself and later completion are unverified.

Company counsel statement quoted in the same original KFYR settlement-progress article.

Response publication date: March 13, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

KFYR

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Project Boulder

South Carolina Environmental Law Project raised land-use, water, air, noise, light, energy and health concerns about Eagle Rock's proposed Cooks Hill Road campus in Colleton County. The group questioned compatibility with the rural ACE Basin setting. These are attributed concerns and legal positions, not Atlas findings of measured harm or an issued permit outcome.

Record status: unknown. The later original zoning, permit and concern outcomes are unknown in this bounded review. Group criticism, related policy debates and company water forecasts do not establish a legal violation, measured conditions, current project approval or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: March 6, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The changing group page discusses an application and concerns without an exact filing or testimony day established in this bounded review. Event date remains unknown; publication is not substituted. The group page displays March 6, 2026. The earlier SC Daily Gazette report was published February 5; its account of a December company statement has no independently established original statement day.

Raised or recorded by South Carolina Environmental Law Project.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Eagle Rock Partners stated, according to SC Daily Gazette, that the proposed Colleton campus would have limited daily water requirements. This is a company forecast reported by an outlet, not independently verified water use or an approved withdrawal.

The earlier report identifies the same Eagle Rock Colleton proposal. Its account of a December company statement predates the March group page and addresses water only. February 5 is outlet publication, not a newly verified operator-original reply date.

Response publication date: February 5, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: PowerHouse Data Centers - Louisville (Camp Ground Road)

Louisville Public Media reported that residents at a March 5 hearing raised questions about pollution, water supplies, electricity demand and local development rules for the Camp Ground Road project proposed by Poe Companies and PowerHouse. The outlet reported approval of revised plans; that vote does not establish that the concerns were resolved or that environmental effects occurred.

Event date: March 5, 2026

Source publication date: March 5, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 19, 2026

March 5 is the hearing date identified in the article and its dated photo caption, separate from this source check. The article carries this explicit first publication date. The October 19 source check is separate.

Raised or recorded by Louisville Public Media.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Poe Companies and PowerHouse were represented by a lawyer whom Louisville Public Media quoted as saying that the electricity and water utilities had assured the developers they could meet demand. This is a reported developer statement, not verified available capacity.

The same hearing report directly includes the representative for the developers answering the water and electricity questions. The publication basis is the outlet report, not a newly located company statement.

Response publication date: March 5, 2026

Response sources checked: October 19, 2026

Louisville Public Media

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Project Skyway (Pine Island)

Recorded event date: February 24, 2026

Google announced Pine Island as a future data center location and an Xcel Energy partnership. Publication date; not an opening or construction-start milestone.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

Legal action: Project Washington (Starwood Digital Ventures)

Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board issued a final order affirming DNREC's coastal-zone status decision for Starwood's Project Washington after an administrative appeal. The decision addresses the project's heavy-industry classification, including its generator context. It does not establish measured emissions, a current operating violation or the result of any later court case. All later judicial and revised-proposal outcomes are unknown in this review. A source check does not advance the project's physical status.

Record status: resolved. Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board issued its April 17, 2026 final order affirming the Secretary's status decision. Resolved applies only to this administrative appeal. Later judicial appeals, revised proposals, present permit conditions and all underlying environmental concerns were not independently established.

Event date: February 17, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: April 17, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original order states that CZICB2026-01 was filed February 17, 2026. The March24-26 hearing and April17 signed final order are separate later events; the disposition date remains separately recorded. The first public posting of the signed order is unknown. April 17, 2026 is its dated disposition, not an invented first-publication day.

Raised or recorded by Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Starwood Digital Ventures argued in the agency-published order that its project was not prohibited heavy industry and should be exempt from coastal-zone regulation. These are the appellant's stated positions; the Board affirmed the status decision. This does not supply the result of any later court review.

The same original CZICB2026-01 order explicitly describes Starwood's grounds for reversal on page2. This is an agency-published company argument in the named appeal, not an operator-original press release. First public posting is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Nebius AI Factory (Independence)

KCUR reported water, power, wildlife and health concerns raised at a February 10 community meeting about Nebius's Independence proposal. The article also describes differing company and city positions. These are reported questions, not measured impacts or an independently verified permit or ratepayer outcome.

Record status: unknown. The outcome of these reported concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Company resource and ratepayer commitments do not establish measured performance or resolution of every question.

Event date: February 10, 2026

Source publication date: February 13, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The article explicitly identifies February 10, 2026 as the community meeting. This was not an independently inspected agency hearing or complaint filing. KCUR published the report February 13, 2026. The changing original Nebius project page has no independently established first publication day.

Raised or recorded by KCUR.

Company-published statement

Nebius stated that it would use closed-loop cooling, sound controls and construction measures, and bear its power costs. These are company commitments, not independently verified resource use, operating noise or future household rates.

The original Independence project page addresses the same resource and neighborhood questions. It is not an express answer to every meeting statement; first publication date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Project Hazelnut

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection announced a comment hearing on Project Hazelnut's water-obstruction and stormwater permit applications, including discharges to Black Creek, Stony Creek and nearby wetlands. The notice scheduled a February 17 hearing with a snow date. It does not establish that the hearing occurred, what residents said, permit issuance or a violation.

Record status: unknown. The later permit and comment-process outcome is unknown in this bounded review. A hearing notice does not establish actual testimony, a final decision, measured discharge, resolution of concerns or present compliance.

Event date: February 12, 2026

Source publication date: February 12, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

February 12, 2026 is the dated announcement, not proof that the planned February 17 hearing or reserved February 19 snow date occurred. The original agency release displays February 12, 2026 publication. The developer page is undated; its source check date and copyright year do not establish publication.

Raised or recorded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Company-published statement

NorthPoint Development described plans to use reclaimed water for cooling and privately fund sewer improvements, and states that it will avoid local potable water and wells for cooling. These are developer commitments, not independent water measurements, a permit decision or verification of completed work.

The undated original project page gives the developer's water-handling position for the same Hazelnut proposal. It is linked as general same-project context, not as an express reply to the February notice, specific stormwater comments or an agency finding.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Project Cannoli

Recorded event date: February 11, 2026

Van Buren Township Planning Commission granted Project Cannoli preliminary site plan approval with conditions, 5 to 2. This is a preliminary planning milestone, not final plan approval, an issued building permit, satisfied conditions or operation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

vbtmi.gov

Public concern on the record: Project Cannoli

Residents raised concerns about noise, water, electric rates, construction dust, health, land use and wildlife during Van Buren Township's Project Cannoli planning review. The minutes record differing views and conditional preliminary approval requiring further steps, including recurring sound monitoring and construction controls. They do not establish measured harm, a violation or resolution of every concern.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the residents' concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The recorded preliminary approval and developer commitments do not establish final approval, actual operation, measured compliance or that each concern was resolved.

Event date: February 11, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original minutes record the February 11, 2026 meeting and testimony. This is not an inferred first complaint date. A first public posting date for these municipal minutes has not been established. The URL folder year and PDF creation metadata are not used as publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company-published statement

Panattoni describes planned sound limits, municipal water supply, generator standards, landscaping and traffic controls, and states that the project is intended to fund its required power infrastructure. These are the developer's published commitments, not independent measurements or proof of their completion.

The company's Project Cannoli page addresses the same project and issues raised in the municipal record. Its publication date is unknown, so it is not presented as a dated express reply to the February meeting.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Stargate Project Jupiter

New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a complaint alleging that Doña Ana County violated open-meetings requirements when adopting Project Jupiter ordinances. It requested that the ordinances and related commitments be voided. These are the filed allegations and requested relief, not a court finding or a verified cancellation of the project.

Record status: unknown. The current independent court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. Counsel describes the litigation as ongoing, but no present docket or final ruling was inspected. The complaint does not establish that its requested ordinance invalidation or other relief was granted.

Event date: February 6, 2026

Source publication date: February 10, 2026

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original court stamp and signature identify February 6, 2026 as the filing day. This is separate from the September 19, 2025 county meeting and the earlier bond-application lawsuit. Source New Mexico published February 10, 2026. First public posting of the filed complaint and evolving counsel case page is unknown; publication is not substituted for the February 6 filing.

Raised or recorded by New Mexico Environmental Law Center.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Nebius AI Factory (Independence)

Residents requested eagle-habitat and permit-record information for the Nebius proposal, as recorded by Missouri Department of Natural Resources in concern 64672. The department recorded providing information with no further action. This documents an assistance request, not a formal violation complaint, inspection finding or permit decision.

Record status: resolved. Residents requested information that the agency recorded providing. Resolved applies only to the agency's recorded information-assistance response and no-further-action entry. It does not establish absence of violations, resolved wildlife effects, permit approval or resolution of other concerns.

Event date: January 24, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original agency entry explicitly records webform submission on January 24, 2026 and received/investigation dates on January 26. The exact later information-response day is not independently established. The report footer is dated March 6, 2026, but its first public posting day is unknown. The report-generation date and April URL folder are not substituted as publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Project Skyway (Pine Island)

Recorded event date: January 20, 2026

Pine Island reports initial Project Skyway land-use approvals: rezoning, annexation, final plat/development plan and conditional use permit. Initial phase only; separate electric-service approval, construction and operation are not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

pineislandmn.gov

Public concern on the record: Crusoe Warrenton Campus

Residents raised questions about approval conditions, the natural waterway and tree line, electricity and whether project commitments would be fulfilled, according to City of Warrenton minutes for the data-center hearing. The minutes also record support and a statement that most earlier questions had been addressed; this does not establish resolution of every concern.

Record status: unknown. The current disposition of these individual public concerns is not established. The separate city approval vote does not resolve every concern.

Event date: January 20, 2026

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

January 20, 2026 is the Board meeting date recorded in the adopted minutes,not the earlier Planning Commission meeting or agenda posting. The first online publication day of the combined adopted minutes is unknown. Agenda posting January 16 and PDF metadata are not substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

City of Warrenton

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Hut 8 River Bend AI Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: December 17, 2025

Hut 8 announced a 245 MW IT lease for River Bend. This is a commercial announcement, not an opening or physical construction-start day.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.hut8.com

Public concern on the record: Silver Bow County

Montana Environmental Information Center reported Butte community questions about data-center water demand, drought, wildlife, electricity costs and access to project information. Its account discusses existing and proposed facilities without a verified assignment of each question to a particular campus. This is an area-level public-group record, not measured harm, an agency violation or an allegation assigned to every Silver Bow County site.

Record status: unknown. The present disposition of these area-level resource and transparency concerns is unknown in this bounded group-source review. Submitted questions, forecast demand and general regulatory proposals do not establish actual water or electricity effects, an agency finding or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: December 15, 2025

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The group report refers to an October16 community event without an independently verified explicit event year. The exact event date remains unknown, rather than inferred from publication. The original group article is dated December 15, 2025 and identifies its December2025 issue. January16,2026 is modification, not a new event. The evolving resource page first-publication day is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Montana Environmental Information Center.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Frederick County

Maryland Department of the Environment recorded public questions about Amazon's proposed generators, health, water, noise, construction and electricity in Frederick County. It made a final determination to issue the air permit effective March 25, 2026. That determination addresses the named air-permit procedure, not measured operating conditions or resolution of every concern.

Record status: resolved. Maryland Department of the Environment recorded a final determination effective March 25, 2026. Resolved applies only to that named air-permit determination. It does not establish actual operation, measured emissions, current compliance, all local approvals or resolution of every comment.

Event date: December 8, 2025

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: March 25, 2026

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

December 8, 2025 is the original documented public meeting date. March 25, 2026 is the separately stated effective final determination, not a source-check or invented hearing day. The first public posting of the packet is unknown. Meeting, application and effective determination dates are separate from publication; the current agency index does not supply a first posting day.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Amazon stated in the agency-published response that it would use county water service, follow local requirements and use acoustic design measures. These are company positions and design expectations, not independently verified operating results or a response resolving every concern.

The agency packet explicitly presents additional Amazon responses for this application, including water and noise. This is an agency-published company statement; original first posting is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: CleanArc VA1

Recorded event date: November 20, 2025

CleanArc reported the start of construction at its VA1 campus in Caroline County. Announced capacity and delivery dates remain separate forecasts.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.cleanarcdatacenters.com

News report: QTS Bessemer (Project Marvel)

Alabama Reflector reported residents' and environmental groups' water, air, noise and electric-rate concerns at a November 18, 2025 Bessemer meeting about Project Marvel. Later reporting described continuing transparency and resource questions. The outlet-reported rezoning is not measured environmental performance or resolution of every concern.

Record status: unknown. The present outcome of these documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Reported rezoning and developer study claims do not establish measured impacts, current compliance, final environmental permits or resolution of every concern.

Event date: November 18, 2025

Source publication date: November 19, 2025

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original meeting photo caption explicitly identifies November 18, 2025. That hearing is separate from an original signed rezoning instrument, later public-records dispute or current permit outcome. The original meeting report was published November 19, 2025. The later resource/transparency article was published August 3, 2026; its relative month wording is not used to invent a separate event day.

Raised or recorded by Alabama Reflector.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Logistics Land Investment stated, according to Alabama Reflector, that its studies supported the project and that it would not affect streams or waterways. These are developer positions, not independently verified environmental conditions or a permit finding.

The original article directly attributes these project-specific statements to the developer's representative at the Bessemer meeting. November 19 is outlet publication; the statement does not answer every later public-records question.

Response publication date: November 19, 2025

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Wiscasset Data Center (Old Ferry Road Site)

Residents raised light, water, utility-cost, land-use and public-information concerns about Wiscasset's prospective data center in preliminary October 21, 2025 minutes. In a later August 24, 2026 interview, Wiscasset Newspaper reported the inquirer's statement that he was no longer pursuing the Old Ferry Road project. That later position is not a finding about actual environmental effects or a permanent prohibition on future proposals.

Event date: October 21, 2025

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The event is the exact dated original public record. The original record supplies a document or meeting date, but its first public posting date is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Boundless Power stated through its representative, as reported by Wiscasset Newspaper, that he was no longer pursuing the Old Ferry Road inquiry and that discussions stopped before a formal proposal. The interview is a reported company position, not an independently reviewed municipal or court disposition.

Later news interview about the same OldFerryRoad inquiry provides relevant company position; it is not a direct reply to each October21 speaker.

Response publication date: August 24, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: CoreSite DE3

Recorded event date: October 6, 2025

CoreSite published a DE3 construction-progress announcement reporting a topping-off milestone. This is the publication day; the exact physical topping-off day and opening day are not established.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.coresite.com

Dated record: Google West Memphis Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: October 2, 2025

Google and Entergy announced the West Memphis development within a wider Arkansas infrastructure investment. This is an announcement, not a construction start, opening or site-only investment allocation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: Edged Columbus

Recorded event date: September 10, 2025

Operator reported opening: September 11 release explicitly describes the opening celebration as yesterday; independent commissioning and all halls are not certified.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Edged US

News report: Project Cumulus (St. Charles)

St. Louis Public Radio reported residents' water-quality and energy concerns about Project Cumulus and CRG's withdrawal of its permit application. Later reporting described a temporary application moratorium. These accounts do not establish measured impacts, permanent cancellation or the outcome of every concern.

Record status: withdrawn. St. Louis Public Radio reported withdrawal of the 2025 permit application. Withdrawn applies only to that application. It does not establish permanent cancellation, a current ban, later replacement status or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: August 18, 2025

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

No independently inspected original filing or exact withdrawal day was established in this bounded review. The outlet announcement day is not substituted for a filing date. St. Louis Public Radio published its withdrawal report August 18, 2025 and updated it that day. The related moratorium report, distributed by KCUR, was published August 23.

Raised or recorded by St. Louis Public Radio.

Company statement reported by an outlet

CRG stated, according to St. Louis Public Radio, that it was withdrawing the application to incorporate community feedback and intended to work on a revised proposal. That intention is not proof a replacement was filed.

The original report quotes CRG's withdrawal email. This is outlet-reported company text; the linked original email could not be freshly inspected. August 18 is the outlet publication day.

Response publication date: August 18, 2025

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Project Mica

Recorded event date: July 28, 2025

Port KC board unanimously authorized up to $10 billion in Project Mica taxable revenue bonds and related documents. This is financing authorization, not proof of issuance, a $10 billion subsidy, construction permission or operation.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

portkc.com

Dated record: EdgeCore Mesa Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: July 24, 2025

EdgeCore announced $235 million ABS financing backed by stabilized, leased PH01 (26 MW reported IT). This is a financing announcement, not a physical opening day, expenditure or incentive.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

edgecore.com

Legal action: Colossus

Southern Environmental Law Center reported filing an administrative appeal on behalf of the NAACP and Young, Gifted & Green challenging the initial South Memphis turbine permit and related department decisions. Its later timeline reports that the air board dismissed the appeals as moot in December 2025. The group account is not an agency violation finding or a court merits ruling.

Record status: dismissed. Southern Environmental Law Center reported that the air board dismissed these appeals as moot on December 15, 2025. This is the group account of this administrative proceeding; no board order or finding on the allegations is certified here.

Event date: July 16, 2025

Source publication date: July 16, 2025

Disposition date: December 15, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original release reports the filing on July 16, 2025. The outcome account separately dates dismissal to December 15, 2025. The filing release is dated July 16, 2025; the retrospective timeline is published May 8, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Prime ORD Chicago Campus

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 24090003 for generator equipment at 1600 East Higgins Road. It is associated here with the existing Prime ORD campus research record through its retained address context. The exact individual building or phase and present operating status are not established by this binding.

Record status: resolved. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued this specific construction permit. Resolved describes that dated permit action only; current compliance, subsequent amendments, other permits and physical operating status remain outside this record.

Event date: July 15, 2025

Source publication date: July 15, 2025

Disposition date: July 15, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives July 15, 2025 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives July 15, 2025 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Oldham County

Louisville Public Media reported residents' opposition to Western Hospitality Partners' Oldham County proposals and a temporary county moratorium covering data-center applications. The report distinguishes an original farmland proposal from a smaller replacement proposal. This is county-level reporting, not an independently inspected ordinance, current ban, final court outcome or an allegation assigned to every county facility.

Record status: unknown. The current legal duration of the reported moratorium and later disposition of all land-use objections are unknown in this bounded review. A reported temporary pause or replacement proposal is not a verified permanent ban, final project withdrawal or court merits decision.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: July 2, 2025

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original article describes a Tuesday vote but an exact independently verified vote/filing date was not established in this bounded review. Event date stays unknown; publication is not substituted. The original county report displays July 2, 2025 publication. Separate August 17, 2026 reporting recalls Oldham context while focusing on other Kentucky proposals; that is not a new original ordinance publication.

Raised or recorded by Louisville Public Media.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Applied Digital Deuel County AI Campus

Residents raised water, backup-generation, power-cost, road, land-use and emergency-response questions during Deuel County's June 17, 2025 Applied Digital discussion. The minutes record company replies about cooling, road work and cost allocation. Those replies describe plans and positions, not independently verified performance, rate protection or completed mitigation.

Event date: June 17, 2025

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The event is the exact dated original public record. The original record supplies a document or meeting date, but its first public posting date is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Applied Digital stated that it planned a closed-loop cooling system and road improvements at its expense, and said it would bear applicable power costs. These are company statements recorded by the county, not verified commitments implemented at the proposed site.

Company representative replies recorded alongside public questions in the same June17 meeting.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Deuel County

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: Colossus

Southern Environmental Law Center reported sending a notice of intent to sue on behalf of the NAACP over alleged unpermitted gas-turbine operation at the initial South Memphis Colossus site. A notice of intent is a preliminary legal notice, not a filed lawsuit or an agency violation finding.

Record status: unknown. The eventual disposition of this initial-site notice has not been established by this bounded review. It is separate from the later administrative appeal and the Southaven power-plant case.

Event date: June 17, 2025

Source publication date: June 17, 2025

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original release reports sending the notice on June 17, 2025. The original SELC release is dated June 17, 2025.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

Southern Environmental Law Center

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Iron Mountain CHI-1

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 23050030 for emergency-generator equipment at 1680 East Touhy Avenue, associated with Iron Mountain CHI1 in Des Plaines. This is a dated air-permitting action subject to conditions, not verification of first operation, present compliance or every local approval.

Event date: June 5, 2025

Source publication date: June 6, 2025

Disposition date: June 5, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives June 5, 2025 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives June 6, 2025 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: CyrusOne Wood Dale Campus

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 24060010 for emergency-generator equipment at 460 and 480 Bryn Mawr Avenue, associated with CyrusOne CHI6 in Wood Dale. This is a dated air-permitting action subject to conditions, not verification of first operation, present compliance or every local approval.

Event date: May 16, 2025

Source publication date: May 19, 2025

Disposition date: May 16, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives May 16, 2025 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives May 19, 2025 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Regulator record: Quantum Frederick

Maryland Department of the Environment recorded an inspection finding that required dust controls were not being implemented at Quantum Maryland and requested supporting compliance information. The company's consultant later described its controls and proposed further measures. This is an agency inspection record and a separate company response, not measured public exposure or a verified later closure.

Record status: unknown. The later agency compliance determination and present outcome are unknown in this bounded review. An information request, company description of controls and future monitoring commitments do not establish agency closure, measured exposure or current compliance.

Event date: March 28, 2025

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

March 28, 2025 is the inspection date explicitly recorded in the agency letter. April 7 is the information-request letter date; the later reply is dated April 29. First public posting of the agency letter and response is unknown. Their document dates are not substituted as publication days.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Quantum Maryland stated through GEI Consultants that a water truck and monitoring program were present and described further dust-control measures. These are the company consultant's submitted account and commitments, not an independently verified agency clearance or measured public exposure.

GEI explicitly submitted the response on Quantum Maryland's behalf to answer the April 7 information request. The agency hosts the signed letter, dated April 29, 2025; first posting is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: T5 @ Chicago III (Northlake)

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 24020017 for emergency-generator equipment at 11650 West Grand Avenue, associated with T5 at Chicago III. This is a dated air-permitting action subject to conditions, not verification of first operation, present compliance or every local approval.

Event date: February 11, 2025

Source publication date: February 26, 2025

Disposition date: February 11, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives February 11, 2025 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives February 26, 2025 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Equinix CH5 (Elk Grove Village)

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 23080013 for emergency-generator equipment at 2001 Lunt Avenue, associated with Equinix CH5. This is a dated air-permitting action subject to conditions, not verification of first operation, present compliance or every local approval. The cover also describes a shared air-permitting source with CH3; the Atlas keeps its two existing research records separate.

Event date: January 15, 2025

Source publication date: January 29, 2025

Disposition date: January 15, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives January 15, 2025 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives January 29, 2025 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: PowerHouse Data Centers - Louisville (Camp Ground Road)

Recorded event date: January 16, 2025

PowerHouse, Poe and LG&E announced the Louisville development and utility-access forecasts. The date is an announcement, not a proved construction start, power delivery or opening.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Permit and comment: Microsoft Hoffman Estates Data Center

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency issued construction permit 23110003 for emergency-generator equipment at 2045 Lakewood Boulevard, associated with Microsoft Hoffman Estates. This is a dated air-permitting action subject to conditions, not verification of first operation, present compliance or every local approval.

Event date: December 19, 2024

Source publication date: December 20, 2024

Disposition date: December 19, 2024

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original permit cover gives December 19, 2024 as its issue date. This is the permit action date, not a verified startup day. The official agency index gives December 20, 2024 as the posting date. The separately recorded issue date and the source-check date retain their own meanings.

Raised or recorded by Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Legal action: MARA Granbury Facility

Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow filed a petition alleging that noise and vibrations from the Granbury bitcoin mine created a private nuisance and requesting a permanent injunction. The petition is an allegation, not a merits decision. The separately recorded denial of a later mandamus petition does not decide those nuisance claims.

Record status: unknown. The current merits disposition of the nuisance claims is not established by this bounded review. A procedural mandamus denial does not resolve those claims.

Event date: October 4, 2024

Source publication date: October 7, 2024

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The original court-filed stamp is October 4, 2024. It is distinct from the October 7 press release. Earthjustice published its release on October 7, 2024. First posting date of the retained petition copy is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: St. Joseph County

Indiana Department of Environmental Management recorded public questions about generator air, health, water, electricity and traffic in its New Carlisle air-permit review for Amazon at 55001 Larrison Boulevard. The agency documented two meetings and its responses. This is a permit/comment record; the reviewed cover has no completed issue date and does not verify a final present-day outcome.

Record status: unknown. The present formal permit disposition and outcome of the documented concerns are unknown in this bounded review. The packet records completed meetings and agency responses, but its blank issue-date cells and statement that a permit will issue do not establish a signed final issuance, current compliance or resolution of every concern.

Event date: October 1, 2024

Source publication date: October 1, 2024

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The agency addendum expressly confirms October 1, 2024 as the initial notice posting and records meetings held December 5, 2024 and January 9, 2025. It does not establish one exact filing day for every public comment. The original initial notice was posted October 1, 2024, as confirmed in the later agency addendum. The current addendum packet has no independently established first posting day, and a blank cover issue-date cell is not a publication or final decision date.

Raised or recorded by Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Bowers Data Center

Recorded event date: September 24, 2024

Santa Clara adopted zoning-map correction 24-9367 for Bowers parcel 216-28-063 toLight Industrial; its effective-date clause states 30 calendar days after adoption. This is not a construction start or completion.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

santaclara.legistar.com

Public concern on the record: MARA Granbury Facility

Public Citizen filed comments on the separate Wolf Hollow power-plant expansion expressing concern that additional electricity could support the neighboring Marathon Digital mine. Its letter speculates about possible mine expansion; it does not establish that an expansion occurred. These are group comments in a public permit packet, not a mine air permit or an agency finding.

Record status: unknown. No disposition of this specific group concern about possible electricity supply to the mine is established by this bounded letter review.

Event date: September 9, 2024

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The letter and agency received stamp both show September 9, 2024; actual pages 92 and 94 were visually verified. The letter is dated September 9, 2024, but first public publication date of the aggregate packet is not established.

Raised or recorded by Public Citizen.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: DataBank DEN5 - Centennial II

Recorded event date: September 4, 2024

DataBank announced a planned October 3 DEN5 grand-opening ceremony. The invitation does not verify the ceremony occurred or establish first-service or first-power day.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.databank.com

Dated record: Bowers Data Center

Recorded event date: August 27, 2024

Santa Clara adopted Bowers use-permit resolution 24-9358 and GPA24-9357, with conditional effective-date provisions. No construction, operating milestone or final engineering-capacity reconciliation is inferred.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Dated record: DataBank Ashburn campus

Recorded event date: July 25, 2024

DataBank announced IAD4 construction had begun. This is the announcement day, not an established physical start or opening day. Its Q1 2026 availability target remains unverified.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.databank.com

Dated record: EdgeCore Culpeper Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: July 18, 2024

EdgeCore announced its Culpeper land purchase and then-current initial 216/potential 432 MW plan. Early 2028 power delivery was a forecast; the current page advertises a different 196 MW plan and mid-2029 capacity target.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

edgecore.com

Permit and comment: Martin Data Center

California Energy Commission adopted Order 24-0612-03h certifying the final environmental impact report, adopting mitigation monitoring and granting a Small Power Plant Exemption for the Martin backup generating facility. The order describes the exemption and mitigation procedure; it does not establish facility operation, all local permits or present compliance.

Record status: resolved. California Energy Commission issued the order granting this specific Small Power Plant Exemption. Resolved applies only to that exemption proceeding, not every local approval, present compliance, individual comment outcome or physical facility stage.

Event date: June 12, 2024

Source publication date: June 13, 2024

Disposition date: June 12, 2024

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

News report: Jigowatt Stanton Bitcoin Mine

KETV reported residents' concerns about fan noise from Jigowatt's Stanton mining site and requests for noise mitigation. The outlet also reported the company's differing perspective. This is a news account, not an independently inspected agency complaint, measured noise result or present compliance finding.

Record status: unknown. The later outcome of the reported noise concerns is unknown in this bounded original-report review. No current complaint disposition, independently checked mitigation, measured noise or present compliance determination was established.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: June 11, 2024

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report does not establish an exact interview day or complaint filing date. Event date remains unknown; the outlet publication day is not substituted. The visible publication day is June 11, 2024 in CDT; the original datePublished timestamp is June 12 at 03:28 UTC, the same instant. Later metadata modification is not a newly verified concern or outcome.

Raised or recorded by KETV.

Company statement reported by an outlet

Jigowatt stated, according to KETV, that views on noise differed and that it intended to continue its Nebraska business. This is an outlet-reported company position, not a verified noise result or completed mitigation.

The original KETV article directly interviews the company about its Stanton site. June 11 is the outlet publication day, not an independently verified operator-original statement date.

Response publication date: June 11, 2024

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

KETV

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Google Kansas City Data Center (Hunt Midwest Business Center)

Recorded event date: March 20, 2024

Hunt Midwest announced Google at Hunt Midwest Business Center and identified JE Dunn as construction partner. This is a project announcement, not a confirmed construction start, actual investment spend or opening.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

huntmidwest.com

Dated record: Google Redhawk Mesa Data Center Campus

Recorded event date: March 14, 2024

Google announced an Arizona grid-energy agreement and described planned Mesa air cooling. The announcement is not a proved opening day or 430 MW of site IT capacity.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

blog.google

News report: NewRays One Bitcoin Mine

Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR) reported residents' allegations of persistent noise from NewRays One's Bono mining site and their lawsuit seeking relief. The report also described the company's procedural arguments. This is an outlet account, not an independently inspected current court record, measured noise or compliance finding.

Record status: unknown. The present case disposition and outcome of the reported noise concerns are unknown in this bounded original-report review. A company procedural argument and a scheduled hearing do not establish dismissal, measured noise, completed mitigation or current compliance.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: January 3, 2024

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report does not independently establish the original complaint filing day. Its scheduled January 5 court date is not treated as a completed hearing or outcome; event date remains unknown. The original KUAR article was published January 3, 2024. A later source check does not make that reporting a current court disposition.

Raised or recorded by Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR).

Company statement reported by an outlet

NewRays One argued, according to Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR), that the claims did not meet procedural requirements. This is an outlet-reported legal position, not a ruling on the noise allegations or a verified current outcome.

The article attributes the procedural statement to the company's lawyer. It does not present it as a noise assessment or response to every allegation; January 3 is outlet publication, not an independently verified original statement day.

Response publication date: January 3, 2024

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR)

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Permit and comment: Bowers Data Center

California Energy Commission adopted Order 23-1108-07 certifying the final environmental impact report, adopting mitigation monitoring and granting a Small Power Plant Exemption for the Bowers backup generating facility. The order describes the exemption and mitigation procedure; it does not establish facility operation, all local permits or present compliance.

Event date: November 8, 2023

Source publication date: November 9, 2023

Disposition date: November 8, 2023

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

California Energy Commission

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Bowers Data Center

Recorded event date: November 8, 2023

CEC order 23-1108-07 granted the Bowers backup-generating small power plant exemption. This is a state-jurisdiction exemption, not final local construction/operation approval; filing/attestation followed onNovember 9.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

efiling.energy.ca.gov

Public concern on the record: NE Edge Millstone Nuclear Data Center

Residents raised noise, power-allocation, watercourse, wildlife, health and public-information concerns about the NE Edge Millstone proposal in Waterford's October 2, 2023 meeting record and attached letters. Earlier Siting Council correspondence records a hearing request. The town minutes also record public support. These are historical public concerns, not agency findings of harm or proof of a current project or permit outcome.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of these historical public concerns, hearing requests and separate boundary procedure is unknown in this bounded review. Acknowledgment, an agenda item or a company update does not establish a granted hearing, current permit, operating impacts or resolution of every concern.

Event date: October 2, 2023

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

October 2, 2023 is the actual town meeting and attached-letter date, distinct from the October4 record stamp. The separate resident request is dated September7 and acknowledged September8; no later hearing outcome or agenda completion is inferred. First public posting of the town minutes and Siting Council packet is unknown. Meeting, letter, acknowledgment and record-stamp dates do not substitute for source publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Regulator record: Quantum Frederick

Maryland Department of the Environment notified Quantum Maryland that it was referring reported site violations for Attorney General enforcement. An earlier letter withdrew conditional approval of a utility-work environmental plan and cited unapproved work and groundwater discharge. These are historical agency actions, not a verified filed lawsuit, current campus shutdown or measured environmental harm.

Record status: unknown. The current enforcement disposition and status of the specific historical plan action are unknown in this bounded review. Referral does not establish a filed court case, awarded penalty, current shutdown or final compliance outcome. Later separately listed plan approvals do not by themselves resolve this record.

Event date: September 7, 2023

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

September 7, 2023 is stamped on the original referral notice. The earlier plan-withdrawal letter is dated May 25, and the company response is dated June 28. No later court filing or disposition day is inferred. First public posting of these documents is unknown. The company response is dated June 28, 2023 despite its May-looking filename; neither document date nor filename is substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Quantum Maryland disputed the agency's factual and legal allegations and reported stopping dewatering and utility work while supplying further information. These are company statements, not independently adopted findings about water safety, compliance or the later enforcement referral.

The original company letter responds to the May 25 plan-withdrawal notice and is hosted by the agency. It is dated June 28, 2023 and predates the September referral; it is not an express answer to that later notice. First posting is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Ebon International Big Sandy cryptomining / data processing complex

Recorded event date: August 28, 2023

PSC rejects the contract, citing ratepayer risk

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

Permit and comment: Martin Data Center

Valley Water requested analysis of water demand, supply and recycled-water options in its environmental-review comment for the Martin Data Center at 651 Martin Avenue. The agency also requested protection of existing wells. This is an agency comment requesting analysis, not a finding of excess use, pollution or a permit violation.

Record status: unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date: March 15, 2023

Source publication date: March 15, 2023

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Valley Water.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: CoreSite CH2

Recorded event date: November 10, 2022

CoreSite published a CH2 media advisory describing a June 2020 opening and a planned community celebration. This is the publication date, not an exact physical opening or a completed future celebration.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

www.coresite.com

Dated record: Aligned IAD-03

Recorded event date: July 26, 2022

Aligned announced the Sterling campus development and a future first-phase target. The target does not establish actual delivery or current completion.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

aligneddc.com

Permit and comment: Greenidge Generation

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued a Title V renewal denial for Greenidge Station, citing greenhouse-gas limits under state climate law. The later November 2025 disposition describes withdrawal of that denial under a signed settlement and remands the application for final processing. This historical permitting record does not establish a current violation, closure or a subsequently issued final permit.

Record status: withdrawn. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recorded withdrawal of the historical denial and administrative hearing request in the November 18, 2025 disposition, confirmed November 19. It does not establish completion of later public/EPA review, actual final permit issuance, achieved emissions reductions, all-party agreement or present compliance. The order records that the public-group petitioners did not concur.

Event date: June 30, 2022

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: November 18, 2025

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

June 30, 2022 is the original denial letter date. The separate November 18, 2025 ALJ disposition is the date used for withdrawal, confirmed by the regional decision dated November 19. The source documents have dated actions and signatures, but exact first public posting days are not established. They stay separate from this source check date.

Raised or recorded by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Greenidge Generation LLC signed a settlement agreeing to seek modified permit conditions, emissions limits and reporting through the agency's public process. The agency-published agreement contains no admission of fact or liability. Signing is not proof that later conditions were completed or a final permit issued.

The signed November 7, 2025 stipulation directly addresses this same denial and hearing dispute. It is a company-executed document published by the agency, not an independently accessible company press release; its exact first public posting date is unknown.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Dated record: Aligned IAD-01

Recorded event date: September 16, 2019

Aligned announced initial Ashburn phase capacity delivery with commissioning underway. This is not a whole-campus completion or opening date.

A recorded date retains its original source and phase scope. A scheduled date does not confirm that the event happened or permission was granted. Source-check dates are separate.

aligneddc.com

Permit and comment: Kapolei Cable Landing Station

Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch issued standard review comments identifying water-quality, discharge-permit and stormwater-planning requirements for the Hawaiki Kapolei cable landing project. Its letter appears in the final environmental assessment with the applicant's response. This is historical review correspondence, not a notice of violation or measured pollution finding. All later permit and compliance outcomes are unknown in this review. A new source check does not establish present site conditions.

Record status: unknown. The current outcome of the specific water-quality requirements and later permit/compliance processes is unknown in this bounded historical review. Applicant commitments and the EA review do not establish implemented controls, measured discharges or present compliance.

Event date: January 4, 2017

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The actual agency letter is dated January 4, 2017; the January9 received stamp is a separate receipt. April11 is the later applicant response date, not the agency comment or source publication. The first public posting date of the original EA packet is unknown. A May23 filename and cover stamps are not substituted for its publication or the January4 comment date.

Raised or recorded by Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch.

Company statement published by an agency or court

Hawaiki Submarine Cable USA stated through its consultant that it would comply with water-quality requirements, obtain applicable permits and use protective planning practices. The consultant also described consultation with the Army Corps. These are applicant commitments in the agency-published response, not verified implementation or current compliance findings.

The April 11, 2017 Tetra Tech letter expressly answers the same January4 Clean Water Branch comments on behalf of Hawaiki Submarine Cable USA and TE SubCom. The letter date is known; its first public posting is not. No new company operating role or extension to the later expansion is inferred.

Response publication date: Not established

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Raeden Project Taurus

Integrity Matters raised questions about Project Taurus's noise analysis, generator emissions, water and electricity needs, and neighborhood protections in Colorado Springs. These are the group's stated concerns and criticisms, not Atlas findings about measured impacts, legal compliance or the current appeal outcome.

Record status: unknown. The present official appeal disposition and outcome of these concerns are unknown in this bounded group-source review. Criticism of models or city standards is not an independent noise measurement, violation finding or proof that the project was finally approved, denied or withdrawn.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The changing group page discusses several past and scheduled proceedings. No single exact filing, testimony or current official disposition day was independently established for this bounded concern item; the event date remains unknown. No independently established first publication date is displayed for the selected changing group page. Dates of quoted records and scheduled meetings are not substituted for page publication.

Raised or recorded by Integrity Matters.

Integrity Matters

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Johnson County

De Soto Chamber of Commerce reported that its community panel addressed frequently raised questions about electricity and rates, water, wastewater and noise. The page names Beale Infrastructure and Digital Realty as separate local developments. This is an area-level record of questions, not verified opposition, a formal complaint, measured impacts or an allegation assigned to either individual project.

Record status: unknown. The later outcome of these area-level resource and nuisance questions is unknown in this bounded review. A panel, city FAQ or general design assurance does not establish a formal complaint disposition, measured conditions, implemented mitigation or resolution of every question.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The undated resource page refers to a June luncheon without an independently verified exact day or year. The event date remains unknown; the website copyright year and source-check day do not supply one. The Chamber resource and evolving city page supply no independently established exact first-publication day. Retrieval is a source check, not a new public event.

Raised or recorded by De Soto Chamber of Commerce.

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Meta Hyperion

Alliance for Affordable Energy published a report raising questions about Hyperion's energy financing, potential ratepayer cost exposure and access to project agreements. The report discusses possible future outcomes. It does not establish actual customer bill changes, a regulatory violation or measured environmental effects.

Record status: unknown. The later disposition of the documented ratepayer and transparency concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Report forecasts and company commitments do not establish actual savings, cost transfers, a final current regulatory outcome or resolution of every concern.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

The report discusses several past decisions and future possibilities without one independently verified exact concern event day. The event remains unknown. The report cover states 2026 but supplies no exact publication day. The May 18 URL path and source-check date are not substituted for first publication.

Raised or recorded by Alliance for Affordable Energy.

Company-published statement

Meta stated in Entergy Louisiana's published announcement that it was working with the utility so other customers would not pay its costs. The release describes expected benefits and planned infrastructure. This is a published company position, not independently measured bill savings or proof that every cost concern was resolved.

Entergy's official March 27 partner announcement explicitly quotes Meta on the same Richland Parish campus and ratepayer cost allocation. It predates the report and is linked as a relevant published position, not an express reply to that report, a Meta-hosted page, final regulatory approval or a new utility operating role in Atlas.

Response publication date: March 27, 2026

Response sources checked: October 18, 2026

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.

Public concern on the record: Loudoun County

Loudoun County reported persistent data center noise complaints and described residents raising air-quality concerns on its countywide information page. The page describes complaint review and enforcement processes. It does not identify an individual complaint case, publish a complaint count or establish a violation at any Atlas site.

Record status: unknown. No individual complaint case or adjudicated outcome is established by this countywide informational page.

Event date: Not established

Source publication date: Not established

Disposition date: Not established

Concern sources checked: October 18, 2026

No exact event date is supplied for this countywide informational account. The captured county page supplies no reliable exact publication date for this account.

Raised or recorded by Loudoun County.

Loudoun County

Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.