<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Data Centers Atlas: Oklahoma</title>
    <link>https://datacentersatlas.com/oklahoma/</link>
    <description>Dated record events and attributed concern items. Exact dates and source limits remain separate; an empty feed does not establish an absence of activity or concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <docs>https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link href="https://datacentersatlas.com/oklahoma/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>News report: Project Spring (Sand Springs)</title>
      <link>https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern:ok-project-spring-opmx-reported-water-consultation-2026</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oklahoma Public Media Exchange reported Osage tribal officials&amp;#x27; questions about water and consultation for Google&amp;#x27;s proposed Project Spring in Sand Springs. An October follow-up reported that a separate tribal-approval bill did not become law. These are outlet accounts; that legislative outcome does not establish project approval or resolution of the water questions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Record status: unknown. The present mineral-lease and project disposition and outcome of the documented water questions are unknown in this bounded review. OPMX reported that a separate approval-authority bill did not become law. That report is not a verified project approval, denial, final lease decision or resolution of every concern.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Event date: Not established&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source publication date: &lt;time datetime="2026-10-16"&gt;October 16, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disposition date: Not established&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concern sources checked: &lt;time datetime="2026-10-18"&gt;October 18, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reports describe several interviews, council discussions and legislative actions without one independently inspected exact concern-event day for this item. Event date remains unknown; neither an interview nor a source-check day is substituted. The original OPMX follow-up was published October 16, 2026; its earlier water and consultation report was published June 25. The project page displays a January 14 update, but its exact first publication date is unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raised or recorded by Oklahoma Public Media Exchange.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Company-published statement&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;White Rose Partners stated on the Project Spring page that initial phases would use non-evaporative cooling and that later water decisions would be coordinated with Sand Springs. These are developer plans, not measured water use, permanent whole-campus commitments or verified approvals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The original developer page explicitly identifies the same Sand Springs proposal. Its plans relate to the reported water questions, but it is not a verified Google-authored statement or an express answer to the later tribal bill. First publication date is unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response publication date: Not established&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response sources checked: &lt;time datetime="2026-10-18"&gt;October 18, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.projectspringok.com/"&gt;White Rose Partners, Project Spring&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.kgou.org/indigenous-news/2026-06-25/as-data-centers-eye-oklahoma-tribes-weigh-the-costs"&gt;Oklahoma Public Media Exchange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.kgou.org/indigenous-news/2026-10-16/osage-bills-about-data-center-operations-reopening-immersion-school-fail-after-pocket-vetoes"&gt;Oklahoma Public Media Exchange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:sha256:0610dd01ae9517751b1c96cb48fad62f98dcc2b3830059ae8f513a53da19bf77</guid>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#record-type">News report</category>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern-category">Water use</category>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern-category">Land use and zoning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News report: Project Atlas at Coweta</title>
      <link>https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern:ok-coweta-flyer-reported-resource-concerns-withdrawal-2026</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Tulsa Flyer reported water and electricity concerns about Coweta&amp;#x27;s Project Atlas and Beale Infrastructure&amp;#x27;s March 30, 2026 announcement that it was withdrawing the proposal. The report attributes the withdrawal to company statements and a city account. It does not establish measured environmental conditions or that every underlying concern was resolved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Record status: withdrawn. Tulsa Flyer reported that Beale announced withdrawal of the Coweta proposal on March 30, 2026, with the city separately acknowledging notification that day. Withdrawn applies only to that reported proposal; it is not a water-quality finding, resolution of every concern or a permanent ban on future projects.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Event date: &lt;time datetime="2026-03-30"&gt;March 30, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source publication date: &lt;time datetime="2026-03-30"&gt;March 30, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disposition date: &lt;time datetime="2026-03-30"&gt;March 30, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Concern sources checked: &lt;time datetime="2026-10-18"&gt;October 18, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The March 30, 2026 original report records the company withdrawal announcement and the city&amp;#x27;s same-day account of notification. This is a reported announcement date, not an independently inspected signed zoning-withdrawal instrument. The original Tulsa Flyer report displays March 30, 2026 publication and same-day update. That is outlet publication, not a separately verified company-original statement publication day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raised or recorded by Tulsa Flyer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Company statement reported by an outlet&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beale Infrastructure stated, according to Tulsa Flyer, that it was withdrawing its Coweta proposal while continuing other Oklahoma investments. The statement does not give a specific reason or establish an environmental outcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The original report quotes Beale about this same Coweta proposal. This is a news-quoted statement, not an independently inspected company-original release or signed withdrawal instrument. March 30 is the outlet publication date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response publication date: &lt;time datetime="2026-03-30"&gt;March 30, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response sources checked: &lt;time datetime="2026-10-18"&gt;October 18, 2026&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://tulsaflyer.org/2026/03/30/news/post/developer-pulls-out-of-project-atlas-data-center/"&gt;Tulsa Flyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Counts describe attributed documentation, not harm or severity. Allegations, procedural outcomes and published replies retain their separate scope.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:sha256:98e293e831f46a7add4a9b887056dbc4597ae7ca22fc9b5bf4dee3412bab1efe</guid>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#record-type">News report</category>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern-category">Water use</category>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern-category">Power and electric rates</category>
      <category domain="https://datacentersatlas.com/concerns/#concern-category">Land use and zoning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>