8 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 2 · Health: 2 · Land use and zoning: 6 · Light: 1 · Noise: 2 · Other: 2 · Power and electric rates: 2 · Traffic and construction: 2 · Water use: 7 · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater: 2
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 8 documented items Public concern on the record Water use · Traffic and construction · Noise · Light · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Land use and zoning
Residents raised concerns about water supply, traffic, noise, light, drainage and industrial land use in letters included in the county Camelback Creek handout. The September 2 memorandum records opposition received after the earlier staff report and also records additional support. These are attributed public comments, not agency findings of actual impacts, a violation or proof of the final Board decision.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date September 2, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 September 2 is the dated county memorandum recording the later correspondence. Individual letters have their own dates; this is not asserted as the first resident concern day. The selected government documents are dated, but their exact first online publication days were not independently established.
Raised or recorded by Residents.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Permit and comment Land use and zoning · Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates · Health
City of Phoenix adopted a revised special permit waiver item for the proposed 5C facility after staff described review of potential public health, safety, water, energy and noise issues. The received staff text predates the final revision. The record does not establish actual impacts, final revised requirements, current compliance or operation.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date July 1, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 July 1, 2026 is the action date in the city matter history. It is not an opening, permit compliance determination or the day of an underlying complaint. The first publication date is not established. The city API modification timestamp is not used as a publication day.
Raised or recorded by City of Phoenix.
Company statement published by an agency or court. 5C Data Centers stated mitigation commitments in information described by the City of Phoenix staff report. The final revised waiver terms were not independently reviewed.
Agency published statement relates to the same named proposal and its future land use or mitigation approach.
Response publication: Not established. Response sources checked: October 22, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Regulator record Air and generators
Pima County Department of Environmental Quality issued a May 12, 2026 notice alleging fugitive dust crossed Project Blue property boundaries during May 8 and May 11 inspections. The County May 22 memorandum records a contractor response and continuing monitoring. This is a documented agency allegation and response, not an Atlas finding, final penalty, closed notice or measured health effect.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date May 12, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The original notice is dated May 12, 2026. The inspections occurred on May 8 and May 11, and the contractor response is dated May 15, 2026. The dated original documents were reviewed; their first online publication dates were not established.
Raised or recorded by Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.
Company statement published by an agency or court. AMES Construction stated in its May 15 response that loss of the project water source halted major earthwork while plant harvesting continued. It described corrective dust controls and a temporary stand down. These are contractor statements published by Pima County, not independent proof of continuing compliance, agency closure or permanent project cancellation.
The County memorandum attaches the May 15 contractor response to this exact May 12 dust notice. AMES is identified as the construction contractor, without certifying a data center operator role.
Response publication: Not established. Response sources checked: October 23, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
News report Water use
Arizona Public Media reported that Tucson revoked a contractor's temporary construction-water meter used for Project Blue dust control, while Beale Infrastructure described the permit as following normal procedures and said it was seeking another source. The outlet later reported separate groundwater-well authorizations. These accounts concern different water arrangements, not an independently inspected violation, final project closure or measured water use.
Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the reported construction-water dispute is unknown in this bounded review. Separate groundwater authorizations, company procedural statements and continued project activity do not establish that every water concern was resolved, a violation was adjudicated, credits were transferred or actual water use was measured.
Event date Not established
Source publication date May 6, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The first outlet report describes a May 4 city letter, but the exact day the construction meter was actually revoked is not independently established. The event date stays unknown; a reported letter, article date and check date are separate. The original reports display May 6 and May 28, 2026 publication with same-day modifications. The item retains the initial May 6 reporting day; later context and this source check are not a filing, revocation or current compliance date.
Raised or recorded by Arizona Public Media.
Company statement reported by an outlet. Beale Infrastructure stated, according to Arizona Public Media, that its contractor followed normal temporary-water permit procedures and that it was procuring alternative construction water. This is the outlet's account of a company statement, not an independently inspected permit, completed alternative supply or agency endorsement.
The original article expressly presents Beale's emailed statement in the same Project Blue temporary-construction-water dispute. May 6 is the article publication, not an independently verified company-original statement date. The May 28 reported groundwater arrangements are a separate source context, not proof that this specific dispute ended.
Response publication: May 6, 2026. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Pima County Health · Air and generators · Water use · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning · Other
Pima County Development Services described potential public health, environmental, energy and water considerations as reasons for recommending a temporary pause and updating data center zoning requirements. The staff packet includes a public health review framework and a prepared resolution. The selected Board signature lines are blank. This is an attributed staff and legislative preparation record, not proof of actual health effects, an executed final instrument or permission for a particular project.
Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.
Raised or recorded by Pima County Development Services.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Regulator record Water use · Land use and zoning · Other
Pinal County October 16, 2025 staff summary recorded Citizen Advisory Committee concerns about La Osa drainage and fire safety, water use and trails or open space. The reported eleven to four recommendation favored the plan amendment. The concerns and advisory recommendation do not establish measured harm, final Board approval or resolution of later legal and permitting questions.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The staff report is dated for the October 16, 2025 meeting. The exact day each earlier committee concern was raised is not adopted. The dated original documents were reviewed; their first online publication dates were not established.
Raised or recorded by Pinal County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Water use · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Land use and zoning
Maricopa County Planning and Development Department recorded public opposition and support for Hassayampa Ranch Z250047. The appended staff analysis attributes concerns about local water resources, habitat and economic effects to opposition letters, while staff supports the rezoning with proposed conditions. The recorded comments are not findings of actual environmental harm, an operating violation or a verified final Board outcome.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 The April 8 report records correspondence from more than one date. A single first filing or hearing testimony day for this concern episode was not established. The selected government documents are dated, but their exact first online publication days were not independently established.
Raised or recorded by Maricopa County Planning and Development Department.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Regulator record Water use · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning
Pinal County October 16, 2025 staff summary recorded Citizen Advisory Committee concerns about traffic and water use for the Energy Generation and Technology Campus. It reports a nine to five advisory recommendation against the plan amendment and separate opposition from the City of Maricopa. That recommendation is not a final Board denial, an operating violation or proof of measured resource effects.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The staff report is dated for the October 16, 2025 meeting. The exact day each earlier committee concern was raised is not adopted. The dated original documents were reviewed; their first online publication dates were not established.
Raised or recorded by Pinal County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
