What public sources record about data center concerns, with the original attribution, dates and limits.
Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. Coverage is incomplete. A missing item does not establish that no concern was raised. A resolved procedural petition does not resolve the underlying allegations.
Newest recorded activity first, using the latest known event, disposition or publication date. A source-check date never moves an item up the list. Unknown activity dates are excluded when a date range is selected.
Supreme Court of Texas issued an order denying the petition by MARA Holdings for a writ of mandamus in the proceeding linked to the Granbury nuisance case. The court also dismissed the motion to stay as moot. This procedural order does not decide the truth of the noise allegations or establish that the underlying concern was resolved.
Record status: Resolved. Supreme Court of Texas issued a denial of this mandamus petition on September 9, 2026. Resolved describes this procedural item only; it does not mean the nuisance merits or alleged effects have been resolved.
The orders page and official docket both date this procedural dispositionSeptember9,2026. The official SupremeCourt orders page is datedSeptember9,2026. First publication date of the dynamic docket is unknown.
American Battlefield Trust reported that QTS withdrew its remaining Supreme Court appeal in the Digital Gateway rezoning dispute. The earlier Court of Appeals opinion affirmed invalidation of the Compass, Digital Gateway North and Digital Gateway South rezonings for public-notice defects. This entry records the appeal and its reported withdrawal, not an environmental finding.
Record status: Withdrawn. American Battlefield Trust reported QTS's withdrawal of its remaining Supreme Court appeal on July 2, 2026. This disposition describes that appeal, not every possible future proposal or an Atlas finding about environmental effects.
The party release reports the withdrawal onJuly2,2026; the earlier court opinion is datedMarch31,2026. The original party release is datedJuly2,2026. The linked outlet response account is datedJuly3.
Southern Environmental Law Center reported filing an administrative appeal on behalf of the NAACP and Young, Gifted & Green challenging the initial South Memphis turbine permit and related department decisions. Its later timeline reports that the air board dismissed the appeals as moot in December 2025. The group account is not an agency violation finding or a court merits ruling.
Record status: Dismissed. Southern Environmental Law Center reported that the air board dismissed these appeals as moot on December 15, 2025. This is the group account of this administrative proceeding; no board order or finding on the allegations is certified here.
The original release reports the filing onJuly16,2025. The outcome account separately dates dismissal toDecember15,2025. The filing release is datedJuly16,2025; the retrospective timeline is publishedMay8,2026.
Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.
Southern Environmental Law Center reported sending a notice of intent to sue on behalf of the NAACP over alleged unpermitted gas-turbine operation at the initial South Memphis Colossus site. A notice of intent is a preliminary legal notice, not a filed lawsuit or an agency violation finding.
Record status: Unknown. The eventual disposition of this initial-site notice has not been established by this bounded review. It is separate from the later administrative appeal and the Southaven power-plant case.
Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked
The original release reports sending the notice onJune17,2025. The original SELC release is datedJune17,2025.
Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.
Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow filed a petition alleging that noise and vibrations from the Granbury bitcoin mine created a private nuisance and requesting a permanent injunction. The petition is an allegation, not a merits decision. The separately recorded denial of a later mandamus petition does not decide those nuisance claims.
Record status: Unknown. The current merits disposition of the nuisance claims is not established by this bounded review. A procedural mandamus denial does not resolve those claims.
Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked
The original court-filed stamp is October 4, 2024. It is distinct from the October 7 press release. Earthjustice published its release onOctober7,2024. First posting date of the retained petition copy is unknown.
Raised or recorded by Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow.
Public Citizen filed comments on the separate Wolf Hollow power-plant expansion expressing concern that additional electricity could support the neighboring Marathon Digital mine. Its letter speculates about possible mine expansion; it does not establish that an expansion occurred. These are group comments in a public permit packet, not a mine air permit or an agency finding.
Record status: Unknown. No disposition of this specific group concern about possible electricity supply to the mine is established by this bounded letter review.
Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked
The letter and agency received stamp both showSeptember9,2024; actual pages92and94were visually verified. The letter is datedSeptember9,2024, but first public publication date of the aggregate packet is not established.
Loudoun County reported persistent data center noise complaints and described residents raising air-quality concerns on its countywide information page. The page describes complaint review and enforcement processes. It does not identify an individual complaint case, publish a complaint count or establish a violation at any Atlas site.
Record status: Unknown. No individual complaint case or adjudicated outcome is established by this countywide informational page.
Event date
Not established
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked
No exact event date is supplied for this countywide informational account. The captured county page supplies no reliable exact publication date for this account.
No documented items match these filters. Try widening them. Coverage is incomplete; an empty result does not establish that no concern exists.
How this is tracked.
Each item is individually checked against its public source and an existing Atlas site, campus, project or exact county ID. Event, source publication, disposition and source-check dates stay separate. Unknown dates and outcomes stay unknown. Private residents speaking publicly are labeled Residents; private residents' names are not printed.
Regulator record
An agency-published inspection finding, notice, order or penalty.
Permit and comment
A permit record, public comment period or hearing notice. A notice does not establish approval.
Formal complaint
An agency-published complaint record or count, distinct from a violation finding.
Legal action
A filed action, appeal or notice of intent. Allegations and procedural rulings retain their own scope.
Public concern on the record
Public testimony, a group statement, petition, resolution or recorded letter.
News report
A reported concern attributed to the named outlet, distinct from an agency finding.
The Atlas attributes statements and does not decide who is right. Verified published operator responses appear beside the item they address, with their publication basis. No verified response does not establish refusal. Category counts can overlap and are never a severity ranking.
Open, pending and unknown items require a source recheck within 120 days. The due date does not advance because the website is rebuilt. County-wide items do not create site findings or map pins. The optional neutral Concerns map layer is off by default.