Atlas / Colorado / Centennial Colorado · City edition Centennial data center record . Explore documented data center records linked to Centennial.
About map locations Records retain this city or place label in the Atlas sources. The map keeps each record's own location limits. A shared city label does not establish a municipal boundary, parcel jurisdiction or a complete list of operating buildings.
Open the full Colorado map · State source notes
Compilation dated October 26, 2026: 4 Atlas records linked to Centennial, Colorado, drawing on 24 public source links. Records can describe sites, campuses, buildings or proposals. Records and source links . Download this data: CSV / JSON .
4 research records
4 status supported
0 status still open
4 mapped references
Reset filters
4 records Status
4 reviewed map references:
DataBank DEN2 - Centennial Centennial · Arapahoe · Source context reviewed Operator-listed service DataBank DEN5 - Centennial II Centennial · Arapahoe · Source context reviewed Operator-listed service Equinix DE1 (Centennial) Centennial postal locality · Equinix operator listing · no site point Operator-listed service Flexential Denver - Centennial (DEN05) Centennial · Arapahoe · Source context reviewed Reported service No records match these filters. Use Reset filters to start again.
Concerns and records. 2 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 1 · Land use and zoning: 2 · Noise: 1 · Other: 1 · Power and electric rates: 1 · Water use: 1
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 2 documented items Public concern on the record Noise · Water use · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning
Integrity Matters raised questions about Project Taurus's noise analysis, generator emissions, water and electricity needs, and neighborhood protections in Colorado Springs. These are the group's stated concerns and criticisms, not Atlas findings about measured impacts, legal compliance or the current appeal outcome.
Record status: Unknown. The present official appeal disposition and outcome of these concerns are unknown in this bounded group-source review. Criticism of models or city standards is not an independent noise measurement, violation finding or proof that the project was finally approved, denied or withdrawn.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The changing group page discusses several past and scheduled proceedings. No single exact filing, testimony or current official disposition day was independently established for this bounded concern item; the event date remains unknown. No independently established first publication date is displayed for the selected changing group page. Dates of quoted records and scheduled meetings are not substituted for page publication.
Raised or recorded by Integrity Matters.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Boulder County Land use and zoning · Other
Boulder County reported that its commissioners expressed concern about resource intensive development, missing data center use definitions and the appropriate scale and zoning locations for the unincorporated County. The page presents proposed code options. These institutional planning concerns do not establish adopted final standards, measured resource use, a City of Boulder ban or an individual site violation.
Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.
Raised or recorded by Boulder County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Community concerns tracker
Rules and source checks. These are county source reviews linked to the retained records. They do not establish municipal boundaries, city zoning, parcel permission or current compliance.
Arapahoe County Source access limited · Checked October 23, 2026.
The October 23 source attempt respected the captured robots policy disallow for this exact planning route. The target page was not fetched. No government policy content was reviewed from the selected target.
No restriction, permission, legal outcome or absence of law is established by this access only review. Other retained project packets have separate scopes and do not replace the inaccessible current code. No alternate identity or access bypass was used.
Access-check target
Power and water. Each figure keeps its measure, basis, date and sources. Forecasts, utility requests, generation and IT capacity are different. These figures are not added into a county total.
View figures: DataBank DEN2 - Centennial Open this record
View figures: DataBank DEN5 - Centennial II Open this record
The dated record. The retained event log distinguishes announcements, scheduled dates and status-source checks. A review date is not an opening day. A target never becomes a completed event merely because time passes.
Recorded events and announcements. September 4, 2024 DataBank DEN5 - Centennial II DataBank announced a planned October 3 DEN5 grand-opening ceremony. The invitation does not verify the ceremony occurred or establish first-service or first-power day.
View 4 status source checks Status source checks. Source checked: October 23, 2026 Flexential Denver - Centennial (DEN05) The captured original Flexential fleet guide names Denver Centennial and offers site colocation and connectivity services with staffed support. Reported service covers this named location only. The guide publication day is unknown. A later ordinary facility page request returned HTTP 403 and further same host requests stopped. No occupancy, live load, efficiency, certification or physical opening date is promoted.
Source checked: October 16, 2026 Equinix DE1 (Centennial) Current operator-listed DE1 colocation service context. A named facility page and published specifications support an operating service component; individual expansions, live availability and full campus completion are not independently inspected.
Source checked: October 16, 2026 DataBank DEN5 - Centennial II Current DEN5 operator-listed service, corroborated by the operator October 16, 2025 Denver guide naming DEN5 among its operating facilities and the current metro listing. The facility template still forecasts early 2024. The September 4, 2024 release invited an October 3 ceremony; neither proves an exact first-service or accomplished ceremony day, or all 16 MW energized.
Source checked: October 16, 2026 DataBank DEN2 - Centennial Current operator-listed DEN2 colocation service component, supported by its named facility page and current metro listing. The observation does not certify complete campus buildout, all advertised capacity energized, current availability, ownership or an exact opening day.
Questions about these records How many records are listed for Centennial, Colorado? In the October 26, 2026 compilation, 4 research records are linked to Centennial, Colorado. This count is not a count of distinct operating buildings. Records and source links .
How many records have an unclear status? In the October 26, 2026 compilation, 0 of 4 records retain an unclear status. Each record links to the evidence for its own stage. Records and source links .
How many records have a reviewed map reference? In the October 26, 2026 compilation, 4 records have a reviewed map reference, 0 show only a county area and 0 have no map point. Street references and approximate areas do not certify a roof or parcel. Records and source links .
