3 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Land use and zoning: 2 · Noise: 3 · Other: 1 · Power and electric rates: 2 · Water use: 3
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 3 documented items News report Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning
WLRN Public Media reported residents' concerns about water, noise, electric costs and land-use compatibility at Project Tango. Its July report describes denial of an expansion, and its October follow-up explains that earlier approvals and a possible future application remain distinct. This records the outlet's account, not verified technical effects, an independently inspected county order or the resolution of every concern.
Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the documented environmental concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The outlet-reported expansion denial is distinct from earlier approvals and possible future applications, and does not establish measured harm, safety, present compliance or resolution of each concern.
Event date Not established
Source publication date July 16, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The initial report describes the county hearing and vote in relative terms. This item does not substitute its publication day for an independently checked exact meeting or filing day. The original report displays July 16, 2026 publication; the distinct follow-up displays October 1, 2026. These outlet dates do not establish an original county-order or company-statement publication day.
Raised or recorded by WLRN Public Media.
Company statement reported by an outlet. PBA Holdings stated, according to WLRN Public Media's October 1 report, that the project had followed transparency requirements and that it would continue working with the county and stakeholders to address concerns and pursue a path forward. This is an outlet-reported company position.
The later article explicitly attributes this same-project statement to PBA Holdings' project manager. October 1 is the outlet publication date, not an independently established original company-statement day; no separately inspected original company response is claimed.
Response publication: October 1, 2026. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Martin County Noise · Water use · Other
Martin County Board of County Commissioners as reported by the County Attorney raised policy concerns about noise, water and electricity consumption, water disposal, land use compatibility and environmental effects during its August 25, 2026 direction to prepare a proposed computing moratorium. These are reported institutional policy concerns rather than measured impacts, a facility specific allegation or an accomplished future legislative finding. The associated unsigned October 27 draft remains a proposal, and its recitals do not establish that the Board adopted them or resolved the underlying questions.
Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.
Event date August 25, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 24, 2026 The County Attorney account reports the August 25, 2026 Board direction and associated concerns. This dates the reported institutional episode rather than first public concern, original publication or an independently read complete minute record. The future October 27 draft date is not a completed vote. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.
Raised or recorded by Martin County Board of County Commissioners as reported by the County Attorney.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Manatee County Water use · Power and electric rates · Noise · Land use and zoning
Manatee County reported staff concerns about potential electricity and water demand, facility scale, land use compatibility, noise and buffering when announcing its data center application pause. The account concerns unincorporated County review and missing use definitions. It does not establish measured impacts, a permanent ban, the signed final law or an individual project outcome.
Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.
Raised or recorded by Manatee County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
