Atlas / Nevada / Enterprise Nevada · City edition Enterprise data center record . Explore documented data center records linked to Enterprise.
About map locations Records retain this city or place label in the Atlas sources. The map keeps each record's own location limits. A shared city label does not establish a municipal boundary, parcel jurisdiction or a complete list of operating buildings.
Open the full Nevada map · State source notes
Compilation dated October 24, 2026: 2 Atlas records linked to Enterprise, Nevada, drawing on 2 public source links. Records can describe sites, campuses, buildings or proposals. Records and source links . Download this data: CSV / JSON .
2 research records
0 status supported
2 status still open
0 mapped references
Reset filters
2 records Status
0 reviewed map references:
Switch LAS 19 Enterprise · Clark · Source context reviewed Status unclear Switch Las Vegas 7 Enterprise · Clark · Source context reviewed Status unclear No records match these filters. Use Reset filters to start again.
Concerns and records. 3 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 2 · Heat: 1 · Land use and zoning: 3 · Noise: 1 · Power and electric rates: 1 · Traffic and construction: 1 · Water quality and discharge: 1 · Water use: 3 · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater: 1
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 3 documented items Legal action Clark County Land use and zoning · Water use · Air and generators · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater
Interior Board of Land Appeals issued a September 1, 2026 stay of the federal Townsite data-center decision, consolidating Boulder City's and the environmental groups' appeals and expediting further review. The groups raised environmental-review, water, air and habitat concerns. The stay is an interim procedural ruling, not a final merits judgment or measured environmental finding.
Record status: Unknown. The current merits disposition is unknown in this bounded review. The September 1 order grants a stay and expedited consolidated review. It denies Boulder City's separate stay motion as moot because the granted stay already provides relief; it does not dismiss the city appeal, finally resolve every concern or establish that the project was withdrawn.
Event date September 1, 2026
Source publication date September 1, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The actual signed order is dated September 1, 2026. It separately identifies Boulder City's July 23 appeal and the June 26 federal decision. Earlier group filing and later briefing are separate events; no completed later filing is inferred. The original group stay announcement was published September 1, 2026; its earlier appeal announcement was published July 27. The exact first public posting day of the original order PDF and city page is unknown; the order date is not assumed to be first publication.
Raised or recorded by Interior Board of Land Appeals.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
News report Water use · Land use and zoning
Nevada Current reported public water concerns and a Nye County vote restricting data centers in Pahrump's Basin 162, linking the decision to the proposed Manse Technology Campus. This is an attributed report about that basin and proposal, not an independently checked present-day court outcome, a statewide ban or a measured water finding.
Record status: Unknown. The current judicial and project outcome and the disposition of the reported water concerns are unknown in this bounded review. The historical basin-restriction report and current developer plans do not establish a final case disposition, site-specific approval or withdrawal, completed mitigation or measured water use.
Event date Not established
Source publication date August 20, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The article describes a Tuesday commission vote, but an independently inspected exact vote date was not established. The event date remains unknown; the publication date is not substituted. The original report displays August 20, 2026 publication. The current developer page has no independently established first publication date; its source-check day is not a new company statement or project event.
Raised or recorded by Nevada Current.
Company-published statement. Manse Technology Campus stated on its project page that the proposed campus would limit water use and avoid burdens on local infrastructure and services. These are developer plans and commitments, not independently verified water use, approval or completed mitigation.
The original project page expressly identifies the same Manse proposal in Pahrump. It has no verified publication date and does not expressly answer the later reported basin restriction or an inspected court case. The statements are linked as developer context, not evidence that the reported concerns were resolved.
Response publication: Not established. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning · Heat
Third Act Nevada reported that it joined Water Over Data Alliance in raising questions about the Keystone project's cooling design, electricity, generator air, noise, construction hours and heat. Reno later published answers to project questions. These are documented group concerns and city responses, not independently established violations or measured impacts.
Record status: Unknown. The present disposition of the documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The city published answers and described planned noise controls and review procedures; those accounts do not establish that all questions were resolved, actual operating measurements or a final determination on every allegation.
Event date June 25, 2026
Source publication date June 26, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The original group article expressly identifies June 25, 2026 as its joint action with Water Over Data Alliance. This is separate from earlier permit approval and later city FAQ updates. The original group article displays June 26, 2026 publication. The city PDF is updated July 28 with earlier dated additions, but its exact first publication date is unknown; update labels and URL timestamps are not first posting dates.
Raised or recorded by Third Act Nevada.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Community concerns tracker
Companies and counties. Company names and sourced roles keep their separate labels in each record.
Switch
Clark County
Rules and source checks. These are county source reviews linked to the retained records. They do not establish municipal boundaries, city zoning, parcel permission or current compliance.
Clark County None found in checked sources · Checked October 17, 2026.
No data-center-specific restriction was established in the checked Title 30 and zoning guidance. The Title 30 page labels its current linked edition effective September 17, 2026 and describes the land-use, zoning and development framework.
This index-level review does not audit every code provision or parcel overlay. Incorporated municipalities require separate checks. An engagement result that resolved to San Antonio, Texas was excluded as the wrong jurisdiction; it is not Nevada policy evidence.
Official source 1 · Official source 2
Power and water. Each figure keeps its measure, basis, date and sources. Forecasts, utility requests, generation and IT capacity are different. These figures are not added into a county total.
No separately typed power or water fact is retained for this county cohort yet. That means unknown, not zero use.
The dated record. The retained event log distinguishes announcements, scheduled dates and status-source checks. A review date is not an opening day. A target never becomes a completed event merely because time passes.
No dated event is retained for this cohort yet. This is an evidence gap, not proof nothing happened.
Questions about these records How many records are listed for Enterprise, Nevada? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 2 research records are linked to Enterprise, Nevada. This count is not a count of distinct operating buildings. Records and source links .
How many records have an unclear status? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 2 of 2 records retain an unclear status. Each record links to the evidence for its own stage. Records and source links .
How many records have a reviewed map reference? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 0 records have a reviewed map reference, 2 show only a county area and 0 have no map point. Street references and approximate areas do not certify a roof or parcel. Records and source links .
