Atlas / New Mexico / Roswell New Mexico · City edition Roswell data center record . Explore documented data center records linked to Roswell.
About map locations Records retain this city or place label in the Atlas sources. The map keeps each record's own location limits. A shared city label does not establish a municipal boundary, parcel jurisdiction or a complete list of operating buildings.
Open the full New Mexico map · State source notes
Compilation dated October 24, 2026: 2 Atlas records linked to Roswell, New Mexico, drawing on 2 public source links. Records can describe sites, campuses, buildings or proposals. Records and source links . Download this data: CSV / JSON .
2 research records
0 status supported
2 status still open
0 mapped references
Reset filters
2 records Status
0 reviewed map references:
Roswell Information Park Roswell · Chaves · Source context reviewed Status unclear Zenith Volts Roswell / Chaves County Data Center Roswell · Chaves · Source context reviewed Status unclear No records match these filters. Use Reset filters to start again.
Concerns and records. 3 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 1 · Land use and zoning: 1 · Other: 1 · Water use: 1
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 3 documented items Legal action Water use
Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of Center for Biological Diversity's emergency mandamus petition involving the State Engineer and lifted its August stay. KANW links the case to non-potable groundwater for Project Jupiter construction. This court outcome does not establish measured water impacts, operational cooling demand or resolution of every water concern.
Record status: Resolved. Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of the named S-1-SC-41580 mandamus request and lifted its prior stay on September 17, 2026. Resolved applies only to that court procedure. No explanatory environmental merits findings, current permits, operational compliance or outcome of the distinct county cases were independently established.
Event date September 17, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date September 17, 2026
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The original September 17, 2026 court filing stamp and signed order establish the decision day for S-1-SC-41580. The prior stay was dated August 23; no petition filing date is invented. The original court PDF first-publication day is unknown. Its signature and court filing dates are decision dates. KANW separately published its report September 23, 2026.
Raised or recorded by Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Company statement reported by an outlet. Oracle stated, according to KANW, that construction uses non-potable water from an existing water-rights holder for activities such as dust control, with State Engineer oversight. It also described conservation efforts. These are outlet-reported company statements, not independent measurements or a response resolving every water concern.
KANW explicitly presents the Oracle spokesperson statement in its account of the same construction-water dispute. It addresses construction-water use, not every operational water or unrelated county-procedure issue. September 23 is the outlet publication; the original company statement day is unknown.
Response publication: September 23, 2026. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Legal action Air and generators
Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of New Energy Economy's mandamus request concerning the Project Jupiter air-permit proceeding and lifted its August stay. The order records that named court procedure without explanatory environmental findings. It does not establish an issued permit, actual emissions, present compliance or resolution of the separate county lawsuits.
Record status: Resolved. Supreme Court of New Mexico recorded denial of the named S-1-SC-41579 mandamus request and lifted its prior stay on September 17, 2026. Resolved applies only to that court procedure. No explanatory environmental merits findings, current permits, operational compliance or outcome of the distinct county cases were independently established.
Event date September 17, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date September 17, 2026
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The original September 17, 2026 court filing stamp and signed order establish the decision day for S-1-SC-41579. The prior stay was dated August 23; no petition filing date is invented. The original court PDF first-publication day is unknown. Its signature and court filing dates are decision dates. KANW separately published its report September 23, 2026.
Raised or recorded by Supreme Court of New Mexico.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Legal action Land use and zoning · Other
New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a complaint alleging that Doña Ana County violated open-meetings requirements when adopting Project Jupiter ordinances. It requested that the ordinances and related commitments be voided. These are the filed allegations and requested relief, not a court finding or a verified cancellation of the project.
Record status: Unknown. The current independent court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. Counsel describes the litigation as ongoing, but no present docket or final ruling was inspected. The complaint does not establish that its requested ordinance invalidation or other relief was granted.
Event date February 6, 2026
Source publication date February 10, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The original court stamp and signature identify February 6, 2026 as the filing day. This is separate from the September 19, 2025 county meeting and the earlier bond-application lawsuit. Source New Mexico published February 10, 2026. First public posting of the filed complaint and evolving counsel case page is unknown; publication is not substituted for the February 6 filing.
Raised or recorded by New Mexico Environmental Law Center.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Community concerns tracker
Companies and counties. Company names and sourced roles keep their separate labels in each record.
No company page is linked to these records yet.
No published county page is linked to these records yet.
Rules and source checks. These are county source reviews linked to the retained records. They do not establish municipal boundaries, city zoning, parcel permission or current compliance.
Power and water. Each figure keeps its measure, basis, date and sources. Forecasts, utility requests, generation and IT capacity are different. These figures are not added into a county total.
No separately typed power or water fact is retained for this county cohort yet. That means unknown, not zero use.
The dated record. The retained event log distinguishes announcements, scheduled dates and status-source checks. A review date is not an opening day. A target never becomes a completed event merely because time passes.
No dated event is retained for this cohort yet. This is an evidence gap, not proof nothing happened.
Questions about these records How many records are listed for Roswell, New Mexico? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 2 research records are linked to Roswell, New Mexico. This count is not a count of distinct operating buildings. Records and source links .
How many records have an unclear status? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 2 of 2 records retain an unclear status. Each record links to the evidence for its own stage. Records and source links .
How many records have a reviewed map reference? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 0 records have a reviewed map reference, 2 show only a county area and 0 have no map point. Street references and approximate areas do not certify a roof or parcel. Records and source links .
