4 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 2 · Land use and zoning: 1 · Other: 3 · Power and electric rates: 1
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 4 documented items Regulator record Power and electric rates · Other
Town of Brookhaven Industrial Development Agency published draft June 17 minutes reporting its earlier position against supporting data centers and its consideration of WF Industrial XII conversion and financial assistance issues. The draft says pending studies would be reviewed before a decision. This records the attributed draft discussion, not final minutes, a binding data center ban, a permit denial or measured environmental and employment effects.
Record status: Unknown. The dated court order or attributed draft board discussion is documented. Later appeals, compliance, final financial assistance disposition and present facility effects remain unknown in this bounded review.
Event date June 17, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The exact action day is printed in the original record. Draft minutes retain their draft status and do not certify a later adopted version. The court document issue day is explicit where supplied. The first online publication day of the Agency packet is not established.
Raised or recorded by Town of Brookhaven Industrial Development Agency.
Company statement published by an agency or court. WF Industrial XII, LLC requested in the Agency draft account that its project not be terminated and described a proposed conversion of its buildings and anticipated employment. This is the Agency published applicant explanation. It does not establish actual jobs, no environmental impact, a final assistance outcome or a current operator role.
The named applicant is quoted in the Agency draft record. A current operating company role is not inferred from that representation.
Response publication: Not established. Response sources checked: October 23, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Legal action Air and generators · Other
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department issued its May 28, 2026 order affirming the judgment requiring CLCPA consideration of the PSC acquisition approval. The May 28 order rejects reliance on a conclusory consistency statement or separate DEC permitting as a substitute for that review. It does not order an individual data center closure or decide every disadvantaged community issue. Later proceedings and current compliance remain unknown.
Record status: Unknown. The dated court order or attributed draft board discussion is documented. Later appeals, compliance, final financial assistance disposition and present facility effects remain unknown in this bounded review.
Event date May 28, 2026
Source publication date May 28, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The exact action day is printed in the original record. Draft minutes retain their draft status and do not certify a later adopted version. The court document issue day is explicit where supplied. The first online publication day of the Agency packet is not established.
Raised or recorded by New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Permit and comment Air and generators
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued a Title V renewal denial for Greenidge Station, citing greenhouse-gas limits under state climate law. The later November 2025 disposition describes withdrawal of that denial under a signed settlement and remands the application for final processing. This historical permitting record does not establish a current violation, closure or a subsequently issued final permit.
Record status: Withdrawn. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recorded withdrawal of the historical denial and administrative hearing request in the November 18, 2025 disposition, confirmed November 19. It does not establish completion of later public/EPA review, actual final permit issuance, achieved emissions reductions, all-party agreement or present compliance. The order records that the public-group petitioners did not concur.
Event date June 30, 2022
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date November 18, 2025
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 June 30, 2022 is the original denial letter date. The separate November 18, 2025 ALJ disposition is the date used for withdrawal, confirmed by the regional decision dated November 19. The source documents have dated actions and signatures, but exact first public posting days are not established. They stay separate from this source check date.
Raised or recorded by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Company statement published by an agency or court. Greenidge Generation LLC signed a settlement agreeing to seek modified permit conditions, emissions limits and reporting through the agency's public process. The agency-published agreement contains no admission of fact or liability. Signing is not proof that later conditions were completed or a final permit issued.
The signed November 7, 2025 stipulation directly addresses this same denial and hearing dispute. It is a company-executed document published by the agency, not an independently accessible company press release; its exact first public posting date is unknown.
Response publication: Not established. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Land use and zoning · Other
Town of Massena Planning Board discussed the intended ultimate use of the ZeroC and Petawatt site while reviewing its proposed substation on February 20, 2025. The minutes record questions about use classification and potentially wasteful cryptocurrency activity, alongside the proponent account of intended computing use and willingness to make a conditional commitment concerning cryptocurrency. The Board approved the substation site plan. These are attributed planning questions and proponent accounts, without a verified executed use restriction, measured harm or proof that concerns were resolved.
Record status: Unknown. The original minutes record questions about the ultimate use and a separate substation approval. That limited infrastructure approval does not independently resolve the planning concerns, establish a binding prohibition of cryptocurrency, or verify current computing stage.
Event date February 20, 2025
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The exact February 20, 2025 Town Planning Board meeting dates this institutional discussion. It is not independently the first day that any person raised a concern. The original minutes identify the meeting day without independently establishing their exact first publication day. The archive filename is not substituted for publication.
Raised or recorded by Town of Massena Planning Board.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
