10 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 1 · Land use and zoning: 8 · Noise: 4 · Other: 3 · Traffic and construction: 2 · Water quality and discharge: 1 · Water use: 2 · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater: 2
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 10 documented items Public concern on the record Land use and zoning
Loudoun County reported significant opposition to data center development at the Amazon GWU campus and announced preliminary alternative use terms. The county described an intent to withdraw the data center application while final agreements still required negotiation. This records attributed opposition and a preliminary response, not a completed withdrawal or a finding of environmental harm.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date Not established
Source publication date October 22, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 The exact day on which the underlying opposition was raised is not established. The October 20 board negotiation action is a separate dated procedural event. October 22, 2026 is the county release publication date. It is not the first day of the underlying public opposition.
Raised or recorded by Loudoun County.
Company statement published by an agency or court. Amazon Web Services stated an intent to withdraw the data center application according to Loudoun County. The county reported that final agreements remained to be negotiated.
Agency published statement relates to the same named proposal and its future land use or mitigation approach.
Response publication: October 22, 2026. Response sources checked: October 22, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Noise · Water use · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning
Goochland County Community Development Department identified outstanding application information and requested revised noise modeling, generator setback and viewshed information, traffic review and updated water and wastewater analysis for Tuckahoe Technology Park. Its August 25 clarification corrects a stated noise reference in the August 20 letter. These are attributed review requests and a correction, not measured harm, a violation finding, a final denial or a statement that the proposal is operating.
Record status: Unknown. The selected letter establishes requested information during application review. The current index links later revised submissions, but this bounded pass does not verify a final response to each request or a current concern disposition. No final application denial, measured impact or operating site is established.
Event date August 20, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 This dates the agency completeness letter, not the earliest concern, publication day or a measured physical effect. The letter supplies its August 20 date and the posted clarification supplies August 25. Exact first online publication days are unverified.
Raised or recorded by Goochland County Community Development Department.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater
Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy opposed the proposed Spring Valley Technology Park and raised concerns about forest loss and impervious cover near Goose Creek. Its website also reports a Planning Commission recommendation of denial. These are the group position and account, not an Atlas environmental finding or an independently reviewed final Board decision.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date Not established
Source publication date July 30, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 The exact first opposition day is not established. July 30, 2026 is the group website publication day. The source publication day is explicit. The exact first concern or application filing day is not established unless separately stated.
Raised or recorded by Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Legal action Land use and zoning
American Battlefield Trust reported that QTS withdrew its remaining Supreme Court appeal in the Digital Gateway rezoning dispute. The earlier Court of Appeals opinion affirmed invalidation of the Compass, Digital Gateway North and Digital Gateway South rezonings for public-notice defects. This entry records the appeal and its reported withdrawal, not an environmental finding.
Record status: Withdrawn. American Battlefield Trust reported QTS's withdrawal of its remaining Supreme Court appeal on July 2, 2026. This disposition describes that appeal, not every possible future proposal or an Atlas finding about environmental effects.
Event date July 2, 2026
Source publication date July 2, 2026
Disposition date July 2, 2026
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The party release reports the withdrawal on July 2, 2026; the earlier court opinion is dated March 31, 2026. The original party release is dated July 2, 2026. The linked outlet response account is dated July 3.
Raised or recorded by American Battlefield Trust.
Company statement reported by an outlet. QTS stated, in a statement reported by Potomac Local News, that it would terminate the Digital Gateway project and wind down its work after withdrawing its appeal. The outlet also reported the company citing its expected investment, jobs and tax benefits.
The outlet reports the QTS statement on the same July 2 appeal withdrawal. This is reported company speech, not a company-hosted original or a statement for Compass.
Response publication: July 3, 2026. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Land use and zoning · Other
Residents raised questions about the scale, agricultural land use and planning controls for the reported TAC Wythe County proposal at the June 9, 2026 Board meeting. The minutes attribute those concerns to residents. They do not independently verify quoted news claims, developer promises, a final project approval, actual construction or measured harm.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date June 9, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The original June 9, 2026 Board minutes record public comments expressly discussing the TAC proposal on pages 6 and 7. The original dated agency record was reviewed. Its first online publication day was not established.
Raised or recorded by Residents.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Regulator record Land use and zoning · Other
Wythe County recorded board concerns about communication and public transparency around the Solis Arx project during the June 9, 2026 joint board discussion. The minutes document those concerns and a call for improved communication, not a measured environmental effect, a final legal finding or a verified resolution. The separate acquisition account does not change the record operator role.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date June 9, 2026
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 The original June 9, 2026 minutes identify a Solis Arx project discussion in the joint board portion on page 31. The original dated agency record was reviewed. Its first online publication day was not established.
Raised or recorded by Wythe County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Noise · Water use · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning
Residents raised concerns about construction traffic, noise including backup generators, water and electricity demand, project notice and possible effects on nearby property during the Cabin Field Road hearing recorded in the September 2, 2025 minutes. These are attributed public comments about a proposal, not measured impacts, a notice violation finding or proof that a facility is operating.
Record status: Unknown. The selected historical public record establishes the attributed episode. A current concern disposition and later published response remain unverified. A land use recommendation or proffer decision does not itself resolve the concern or establish physical harm.
Event date September 2, 2025
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 This dates the selected public record episode, not the earliest concern or a present physical effect. The selected public record supplies the action day; exact first online publication day remains unverified.
Raised or recorded by Residents.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Permit and comment Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Water quality and discharge
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a permit reauthorization notice for the Sharpless restricted data center campus north of Wellington Road. It describes changed jurisdiction over aquatic resources, earlier permits and applicant mitigation. This is a regulatory application and comment record, not a finding of a new violation, measured present impacts or facility operation.
Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.
Event date November 10, 2023
Source publication date November 10, 2023
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 22, 2026 November 10, 2023 is the dated public notice. The initial application filing day and later decision day are not established. The source publication day is explicit. The exact first concern or application filing day is not established unless separately stated.
Raised or recorded by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Company statement published by an agency or court. Sharpless Enterprises LLC describes alternatives, avoidance and mitigation in the application information published by the Corps notice. The notice reports completed credit purchases under earlier permits. This does not independently establish current field compliance or measured impacts.
Agency published applicant information concerns the same restricted campus and regulated water impacts.
Response publication: November 10, 2023. Response sources checked: October 22, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Noise · Land use and zoning · Other
Warrenton Planning Commission recorded a recommendation of denial, as summarized in the Town FAQ, citing missing noise and power information, tax justification, scenic gateway and viewshed effects, Comprehensive Plan compliance and decommissioning information. The FAQ dates the recommendation to December 20, 2022. This is an attributed historical advisory assessment, not the final Council action, a current permit violation or measured harm.
Record status: Unknown. The selected historical public record establishes the attributed episode. A current concern disposition and later published response remain unverified. A land use recommendation or proffer decision does not itself resolve the concern or establish physical harm.
Event date December 20, 2022
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 23, 2026 This dates the selected public record episode, not the earliest concern or a present physical effect. The selected public record supplies the action day; exact first online publication day remains unverified.
Raised or recorded by Warrenton Planning Commission.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Loudoun County Noise · Air and generators
Loudoun County reported persistent data center noise complaints and described residents raising air-quality concerns on its countywide information page. The page describes complaint review and enforcement processes. It does not identify an individual complaint case, publish a complaint count or establish a violation at any Atlas site.
Record status: Unknown. No individual complaint case or adjudicated outcome is established by this countywide informational page.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 No exact event date is supplied for this countywide informational account. The captured county page supplies no reliable exact publication date for this account.
Raised or recorded by Loudoun County.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
