Atlas / Kansas / Kansas City Kansas · City edition Kansas City data center record . Explore documented data center records linked to Kansas City.
About map locations Records retain this city or place label in the Atlas sources. The map keeps each record's own location limits. A shared city label does not establish a municipal boundary, parcel jurisdiction or a complete list of operating buildings.
Open the full Kansas map · State source notes
Compilation dated October 24, 2026: 2 Atlas records linked to Kansas City, Kansas, drawing on 2 public source links. Records can describe sites, campuses, buildings or proposals. Records and source links . Download this data: CSV / JSON .
2 research records
1 status supported
1 status still open
0 mapped references
Reset filters
2 records Status
0 reviewed map references:
Project Red Wolf Kansas City · Wyandotte · Source context reviewed Status unclear Project Yardbird Kansas City · Wyandotte · Source context reviewed Listed proposal No records match these filters. Use Reset filters to start again.
Concerns and records. 2 documented items. Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. One item can have more than one category.
Air and generators: 1 · Land use and zoning: 1 · Noise: 2 · Power and electric rates: 1 · Water quality and discharge: 1 · Water use: 2
This is a bounded source collection. Missing items do not establish that no concern was raised. A case disposition does not establish facility operating status or resolve the underlying allegations.
View 2 documented items News report Water use · Noise · Air and generators · Land use and zoning
Johnson County Post via KCUR reported residents raised water, noise, air and property-value concerns about Beale Infrastructure's Gardner proposal. The outlet reported that the company withdrew the application after the city said it would provide no incentives. The nearby De Soto and Spring Hill projects are separate.
Record status: Withdrawn. Johnson County Post via KCUR reported withdrawal of this Gardner application. The City of Gardner separately reported the withdrawal in a statement published May 6, 2026. These sources do not establish that every concern was resolved or that future proposals are barred.
Exact disposition date is not established by either source. The city statement was published May 6, 2026 and the news report May 7; these publication dates are not substituted for the withdrawal-action day.
Event date May 4, 2026
Source publication date May 7, 2026
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The article explicitly identifies the council meeting date; it is not the source-check date. The original news article displays May 7, 2026 as publication. The separate city statement displays May 6, 2026. These are publication dates, not an inferred withdrawal-action day.
Raised or recorded by Johnson County Post via KCUR.
Company statement reported by an outlet. Beale Infrastructure stated, as reported by Johnson County Post via KCUR, that it would not proceed with the Gardner project at that time and appreciated community and city input.
Company statement quoted by the reporting outlet about the same Gardner application; no original withdrawal letter is independently verified.
Response publication: May 7, 2026. Response sources checked: October 18, 2026.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Public concern on the record Johnson County Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates
De Soto Chamber of Commerce reported that its community panel addressed frequently raised questions about electricity and rates, water, wastewater and noise. The page names Beale Infrastructure and Digital Realty as separate local developments. This is an area-level record of questions, not verified opposition, a formal complaint, measured impacts or an allegation assigned to either individual project.
Record status: Unknown. The later outcome of these area-level resource and nuisance questions is unknown in this bounded review. A panel, city FAQ or general design assurance does not establish a formal complaint disposition, measured conditions, implemented mitigation or resolution of every question.
Event date Not established
Source publication date Not established
Disposition date Not established
Concern sources checked October 18, 2026 The undated resource page refers to a June luncheon without an independently verified exact day or year. The event date remains unknown; the website copyright year and source-check day do not supply one. The Chamber resource and evolving city page supply no independently established exact first-publication day. Retrieval is a source check, not a new public event.
Raised or recorded by De Soto Chamber of Commerce.
No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.
Report a correction · Link to this item
Community concerns tracker
Companies and counties. Company names and sourced roles keep their separate labels in each record.
No company page is linked to these records yet.
No published county page is linked to these records yet.
Rules and source checks. These are county source reviews linked to the retained records. They do not establish municipal boundaries, city zoning, parcel permission or current compliance.
Power and water. Each figure keeps its measure, basis, date and sources. Forecasts, utility requests, generation and IT capacity are different. These figures are not added into a county total.
No separately typed power or water fact is retained for this county cohort yet. That means unknown, not zero use.
The dated record. The retained event log distinguishes announcements, scheduled dates and status-source checks. A review date is not an opening day. A target never becomes a completed event merely because time passes.
View 1 status source checks Status source checks. Source checked: October 23, 2026 Project Yardbird The complete original publicly served PowerTransitions Quindaro offering names PT Yardbird and describes a future data center opportunity at the former power station. This supports a listed proposal. Its November 2025 month label is not an exact publication day. Conceptual preparation dates, future power availability and infrastructure marketing do not independently establish current computing construction, delivered IT load or commissioned service. The public document invitation for further confidential material was not followed, and no contact or agreement was made.
Questions about these records How many records are listed for Kansas City, Kansas? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 2 research records are linked to Kansas City, Kansas. This count is not a count of distinct operating buildings. Records and source links .
How many records have an unclear status? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 1 of 2 records retain an unclear status. Each record links to the evidence for its own stage. Records and source links .
How many records have a reviewed map reference? In the October 24, 2026 compilation, 0 records have a reviewed map reference, 2 show only a county area and 0 have no map point. Street references and approximate areas do not certify a roof or parcel. Records and source links .
