Compare data center records
Choose any two states, counties or companies. Counts describe research records rather than distinct operating buildings. County contexts and company associations retain their documented limits.
Start with Kentucky and Texas
| Research label | Kentucky | Texas |
|---|---|---|
| operating | 21 | 42 |
| approved | 2 | 0 |
| proposed | 13 | 22 |
| building | 2 | 9 |
| paused | 3 | 0 |
| stopped | 4 | 0 |
| unknown | 1 | 45 |
Enable JavaScript to choose a different pair and create a share card. Download all comparison inputs.
Share this comparison
Power subtotal limits
Only three separately reviewed campus records currently qualify for the future contracted critical IT subtotal: Hawesville, River Bend and Beacon Point. The components within each campus are counted once. Utility supply, backup generation, IT capacity and measured demand are different measures and are never added together. Other figures remain unaggregated. An unavailable total is not zero. The linked record evidence explains each included term.
Company lists can overlap: a record may name more than one company. County contexts can overlap or remain uncertain. Comparing two groups does not make them additive. Dates are compilation dates, not current operating audits.
Updated . What changed: Dated page documentation. Individual source dates remain with the evidence.