Community concerns.

Water use · Land use and zoning · Other

Juab County Planning Commission recorded concerns about water resources, effects on agricultural users, future tenant demand and the proposed industrial use in Dog Valley. The body documents differing views and a recommendation to County Commissioners. This is an attributed planning discussion, not a final rezoning decision, a finding of actual groundwater effects or independent confirmation of project benefits.

Record status: Unknown. The planning concern is documented in an original County record. Final individual application disposition, later resolution and measured conditions are unknown in this bounded review.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The cover and opening give November 19, 2025 while the printed page 4 header gives September 17, 2025. The conflicting source dates remain unresolved, so no exact concern event day is adopted. Exact first online publication day is not established.

Raised or recorded by Juab County Planning Commission.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Noise · Land use and zoning

City of Temple described domestic water limits and noise safeguards for the Rowan Project Temple development. The FAQ describes a contractual domestic water cap and requires acoustic review before occupancy. These are agency described development controls, not measured water withdrawal, a noise violation, completed compliance or an operating milestone.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 22, 2026

The exact agreement execution or first condition adoption date is not established from this undated FAQ. An exact first publication or revision date for the city FAQ is not established.

Raised or recorded by City of Temple.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Power and electric rates · Health · Land use and zoning · Other

Washington County Tennessee published proposed moratorium text describing concerns about electricity demand, possible household cost effects, continuous cooling noise, health, property values and rural land use compatibility. The text also questions the balance between infrastructure demands and community benefits. These are the stated reasons in a prepared legislative text, without independent proof of measured effects, a verified executed version of every recital or a finding against an individual computing facility.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The selected government record does not independently establish an exact first concern day or original publication day. A meeting date, folder month and source check day do not substitute for that event. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Washington County Tennessee.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Power and electric rates · Health · Land use and zoning · Other

Sullivan County Tennessee published sponsor versions of a proposed data and cryptocurrency mining moratorium describing concerns about electricity demand, household costs, cooling noise, health, property values and rural community character. The proposed recitals also question community benefits compared with infrastructure demands. These are attributed sponsor text in an official packet, without measured injury, a verified completed Board vote, an executed current rule or proof that all facilities have those effects.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The selected government record does not independently establish an exact first concern day or original publication day. A meeting date, folder month and source check day do not substitute for that event. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Sullivan County Tennessee.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Power and electric rates · Noise · Air and generators · Light · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County recorded possible land use incompatibility, electrical demand, generators, noise, vibration, lighting and stormwater issues in the BL2026 1448 legislative text. These are the institutional reasons stated for defining and reviewing data center uses, not documented violations, measured effects or a determination about every site. The displayed older term is not used to replace the separate reviewed amendment or certify current legal effect.

Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.

Raised or recorded by Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Health · Other

Clean Air Council submitted public comments asking DEP to consider cumulative environmental and health impacts around the proposed Hummingbird development, including the associated gas infrastructure and water demand. The government published comment records the group position. Its health, water, well and employment estimates are not independently verified, and the letter does not establish measured impacts from an operating Hummingbird facility or a final permit outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The original comment has no exact day. Its November 2025 folder name is not converted into an event date. The original determination date is retained where explicit. The first online publication day of the undated public comment is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Clean Air Council.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates

City of Coweta reported in its original December 2025 City Manager newsletter that environmental impact and energy use concerns about Project Atlas were being considered. This is an attributed City account of concerns rather than measured environmental harm, a quantified resource finding or an adopted project decision. Forecast benefits in the same account remain prospective.

Record status: Unknown. The selected original record documents an attributed concern or resource review, without independently establishing the complete disposition, measured harm or present compliance.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The original newsletter is labeled December 2025, without an independently established exact publication day or first concern day. No day within that month is invented. The selected original body does not independently establish the exact web publication day of the complete concern record. Retrieval is not publication.

Raised or recorded by City of Coweta.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Air and generators

City of Springfield published residents questions about 5C power, water, generators and oversight with answers supplied by the company. This records the public questions and attributed response, not an independent finding of grid readiness, permit compliance, actual water demand, emissions or harm.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 22, 2026

The exact first date of residents questions is not established from the undated FAQ. An exact first publication or update day is not established.

Raised or recorded by City of Springfield.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Power and electric rates · Water use · Land use and zoning · Other

City of Millville Planning Board recorded the planner discussion of energy and water demand, limited permanent employment and land use compatibility during review of a proposed data center prohibition. The minutes also record public and property owner support and objections. This is municipal policy context for the Millville development record, not an Atlas finding of measured site harm, a final application denial or a court ruling on the ordinance legality.

Record status: Unknown. The documented municipal policy discussion is verified only within the reviewed packet. Final ordinance passage, individual project disposition, current compliance and measured environmental effects remain separate and unresolved here.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The included minutes print an April 13, 2025 meeting header inside a May 2026 packet discussing Ordinance 48 of 2026. That conflicting year is not silently corrected into an exact event day. The original packet is for the May 2026 meeting, but its first web publication day is not established.

Raised or recorded by City of Millville Planning Board.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Air and generators · Land use and zoning

Clean Water for North Carolina raised concerns about groundwater, the Deep River, air emissions and the public review process for the named Deep River Data gas powered AI proposal near Cumnock. The group requested local moratoriums and additional community input. This records its stated concerns and requests, not an Atlas finding of contamination, actual drilling, measured emissions, a completed public vote or an enacted moratorium.

Record status: Unknown. The group concern and requested local planning pause are documented. Actual environmental conditions, current permit disposition and resolution of the concern remain unknown.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The campaign source does not establish an exact first concern event date. Its month and day meeting references do not become accomplished events or an inferred year. Exact first online publication day is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Clean Water for North Carolina.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Noise · Other

Davidson County Planning and Zoning staff published proposed ordinance text describing questions about grid capacity, residential and small business electricity rates, water and sewer capacity, heat, noise and industrial or agricultural land use. The accompanying agenda memorandum presents the ordinance for Board consideration. These are concerns stated in a staff proposal rather than an accomplished Board finding, enacted moratorium, measured County impact or allegation against an individual project.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The selected government record does not independently establish an exact first concern day or original publication day. A meeting date, folder month and source check day do not substitute for that event. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Davidson County Planning and Zoning staff.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Water use · Noise · Power and electric rates · Health

Residents said in selected public comments on the original Missoula County Bonner project page that they opposed the proposed Krambu facility because of potential noise, water effects, utility costs, nearby schools and community compatibility. These are attributed public concerns rather than County findings of measured harm. The complete comment history and exact comment dates were not independently reviewed.

Record status: Unknown. The original County page records public concern and an undated property owner withdrawal update. This does not independently establish the complete concern disposition, removal of every future proposal or measured harm.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The original page displays relative public feedback timestamps. Exact comment days and the later property owner withdrawal day are not independently established in the selected body. No exact publication day for the current County project update and selected public comments is independently printed in the read body. Retrieval day is not an event or publication day.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Water use

Missouri Department of Conservation recorded a Lumon Solutions Marshfield project description reporting area residents concerned about natural resources, conservation and wildlife. The report explicitly says it is not site clearance and that a lack of known occurrence records does not establish species absence. This is an attributed resource review and reported public concern rather than measured ecological harm or completed consultation.

Record status: Unknown. The selected original record documents an attributed concern or resource review, without independently establishing the complete disposition, measured harm or present compliance.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The original report was created May 14, 2026. Exact first days of the described resident concerns are not independently established. The selected original body does not independently establish the exact web publication day of the complete concern record. Retrieval is not publication.

Raised or recorded by Missouri Department of Conservation.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Land use and zoning · Power and electric rates · Water use

City of St Louis reported that community concerns about noise, walkability, sustainability, power and water led to required conditions for the Armory computing proposal. The City also described prospective community benefits. These are attributed concerns and conditions rather than measured harm, an executed benefit agreement or proof of current compliance.

Record status: Unknown. The selected original record documents an attributed concern or resource review, without independently establishing the complete disposition, measured harm or present compliance.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The City release is dated April 21, 2026, but exact first days of the underlying community concerns are not independently established. The selected original body does not independently establish the exact web publication day of the complete concern record. Retrieval is not publication.

Raised or recorded by City of St Louis.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators · Water use · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning

Frederick County described public questions about diesel generators, air quality, water supply, power and transparency on its data center policy page, alongside its County application pause and large load registration requirement. This is a County policy and public information record, separate from the Maryland environment agency Amazon permit comment determination. It does not establish measured harm, a completed impact study, permission for every property or a stop to existing construction.

Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.

Raised or recorded by Frederick County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates

De Soto Chamber of Commerce reported that its community panel addressed frequently raised questions about electricity and rates, water, wastewater and noise. The page names Beale Infrastructure and Digital Realty as separate local developments. This is an area-level record of questions, not verified opposition, a formal complaint, measured impacts or an allegation assigned to either individual project.

Record status: Unknown. The later outcome of these area-level resource and nuisance questions is unknown in this bounded review. A panel, city FAQ or general design assurance does not establish a formal complaint disposition, measured conditions, implemented mitigation or resolution of every question.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The undated resource page refers to a June luncheon without an independently verified exact day or year. The event date remains unknown; the website copyright year and source-check day do not supply one. The Chamber resource and evolving city page supply no independently established exact first-publication day. Retrieval is a source check, not a new public event.

Raised or recorded by De Soto Chamber of Commerce.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Noise · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Town of Tyrone recorded residents questions about the Microsoft proposal, including water, power, noise, environmental impacts and zoning oversight. The town explains its review and future permit processes. Those explanations and Microsoft design commitments are not findings of measured site impacts, verified compliance or an operating facility.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 22, 2026

The town page describes public questions without an exact first concern day. Conflicting operator session date descriptions are not used as an accomplished event. The exact first publication day of the town FAQ and operator boards was not established.

Raised or recorded by Town of Tyrone.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Land use and zoning

Effingham County reported resident concerns about noise near the proposed Project Camellia campus. Its account describes planned offsite power generation, separation, a future noise study and monitoring commitments. This documents the concern and proposed response, not measured noise impacts, completed controls or a finding of noncompliance.

Record status: Unknown. The concern is documented in the County project account. An exact concern meeting date, later resolution and measured conditions remain unknown.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The source account gives no verified exact concern event date. Exact first online publication day is not established.

Raised or recorded by Effingham County.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Other

Augusta Georgia Government identifies noise, lighting, visual effects, buffers from residential neighborhoods and sensitive land uses, utility coordination, emergency access, environmental performance and stormwater as subjects of its proposed computing ordinance. The original account frames these as safeguards for residents and community character. These are attributed institutional policy concerns rather than measured noise, a proven service shortage, a violation or a facility specific allegation. Different proposed, approved and considering labels remain explicit, without certifying complete enactment, an effective day or resolution of these policy concerns.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The selected government record does not independently establish an exact first concern day or original publication day. A meeting date, folder month and source check day do not substitute for that event. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Augusta Georgia Government.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Noise · Land use and zoning

Manatee County reported staff concerns about potential electricity and water demand, facility scale, land use compatibility, noise and buffering when announcing its data center application pause. The account concerns unincorporated County review and missing use definitions. It does not establish measured impacts, a permanent ban, the signed final law or an individual project outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The selected official record documents institutional concerns and a regulatory review context. Their current resolution, actual environmental or utility effects, individual project eligibility and later legal changes remain unverified. A policy pause does not establish that a concern was resolved.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The selected official document does not establish the exact first day these institutional concerns were raised. No publication or source check day substitutes for that event. The exact first online publication day is not supplied in the selected official source.

Raised or recorded by Manatee County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item