Community concerns.

Air and generators · Water quality and discharge · Land use and zoning

City of Lowell planning staff requested clarification of generator counts, screening progress and hazardous substance practices in the September 16, 2024 Markley site plan memorandum. Staff described screening as a significant issue for abutters and also recorded applicant emissions and stormwater accounts. These are permit review comments rather than findings of measured harm, a violation, final approval or completed mitigation.

Record status: Unknown. The original City memorandum explicitly identifies Markley Lowell and its site plan. Existing provider service does not independently resolve the earlier screening, equipment clarification or substance handling review. The separate later State appeal was not read and is not merged into this staff review.

Event date

September 16, 2024

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The original staff memorandum bears September 16, 2024. This dates the documented staff review rather than a first complaint, final Board vote or later permit appeal. The original dated document establishes its printed review or testimony day without independently establishing first publication. Archive paths, wrapper timestamps and retrieval dates do not become publication or opening dates.

Raised or recorded by City of Lowell planning staff.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Power and electric rates

Public Citizen filed comments on the separate Wolf Hollow power-plant expansion expressing concern that additional electricity could support the neighboring Marathon Digital mine. Its letter speculates about possible mine expansion; it does not establish that an expansion occurred. These are group comments in a public permit packet, not a mine air permit or an agency finding.

Record status: Unknown. No disposition of this specific group concern about possible electricity supply to the mine is established by this bounded letter review.

Event date

September 9, 2024

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The letter and agency received stamp both show September 9, 2024; actual pages 92 and 94 were visually verified. The letter is dated September 9, 2024, but first public publication date of the aggregate packet is not established.

Raised or recorded by Public Citizen.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators

California Energy Commission adopted Order 24-0612-03h certifying the final environmental impact report, adopting mitigation monitoring and granting a Small Power Plant Exemption for the Martin backup generating facility. The order describes the exemption and mitigation procedure; it does not establish facility operation, all local permits or present compliance.

Record status: Resolved. California Energy Commission issued the order granting this specific Small Power Plant Exemption. Resolved applies only to that exemption proceeding, not every local approval, present compliance, individual comment outcome or physical facility stage.

Event date

June 12, 2024

Source publication date

June 13, 2024

Disposition date

June 12, 2024

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise

KETV reported residents' concerns about fan noise from Jigowatt's Stanton mining site and requests for noise mitigation. The outlet also reported the company's differing perspective. This is a news account, not an independently inspected agency complaint, measured noise result or present compliance finding.

Record status: Unknown. The later outcome of the reported noise concerns is unknown in this bounded original-report review. No current complaint disposition, independently checked mitigation, measured noise or present compliance determination was established.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

June 11, 2024

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The report does not establish an exact interview day or complaint filing date. Event date remains unknown; the outlet publication day is not substituted. The visible publication day is June 11, 2024 in CDT; the original datePublished timestamp is June 12 at 03:28 UTC, the same instant. Later metadata modification is not a newly verified concern or outcome.

Raised or recorded by KETV.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Power and electric rates · Water use · Land use and zoning · Other

Adair County Board of Supervisors recorded concerns about water and electricity during the April 2 Applied Digital discussion and residential setbacks and project information during the April 24 ordinance hearing. The minutes contain differing Board views and a failed motion to abandon the ordinance. This is an attributed historic planning discussion, not an Atlas finding of actual utility impacts, a final project denial or proof that a proposed setback became current law.

Record status: Unknown. The historic public discussion and recorded concerns are documented. Current project phase, final ordinance, later resolution of individual concerns and measured impacts remain unknown in this bounded review.

Event date

April 24, 2024

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The April 24, 2024 date is printed in the original County minutes. The earlier April 2 discussion remains separate context. Meeting days are explicit, but exact first online publication days are not established.

Raised or recorded by Adair County Board of Supervisors.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise

Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR) reported residents' allegations of persistent noise from NewRays One's Bono mining site and their lawsuit seeking relief. The report also described the company's procedural arguments. This is an outlet account, not an independently inspected current court record, measured noise or compliance finding.

Record status: Unknown. The present case disposition and outcome of the reported noise concerns are unknown in this bounded original-report review. A company procedural argument and a scheduled hearing do not establish dismissal, measured noise, completed mitigation or current compliance.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

January 3, 2024

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The report does not independently establish the original complaint filing day. Its scheduled January 5 court date is not treated as a completed hearing or outcome; event date remains unknown. The original KUAR article was published January 3, 2024. A later source check does not make that reporting a current court disposition.

Raised or recorded by Little Rock Public Radio (KUAR).

Report a correction · Link to this item

Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Water quality and discharge

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a permit reauthorization notice for the Sharpless restricted data center campus north of Wellington Road. It describes changed jurisdiction over aquatic resources, earlier permits and applicant mitigation. This is a regulatory application and comment record, not a finding of a new violation, measured present impacts or facility operation.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

November 10, 2023

Source publication date

November 10, 2023

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 22, 2026

November 10, 2023 is the dated public notice. The initial application filing day and later decision day are not established. The source publication day is explicit. The exact first concern or application filing day is not established unless separately stated.

Raised or recorded by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators

California Energy Commission adopted Order 23-1108-07 certifying the final environmental impact report, adopting mitigation monitoring and granting a Small Power Plant Exemption for the Bowers backup generating facility. The order describes the exemption and mitigation procedure; it does not establish facility operation, all local permits or present compliance.

Record status: Resolved. California Energy Commission issued the order granting this specific Small Power Plant Exemption. Resolved applies only to that exemption proceeding, not every local approval, present compliance, individual comment outcome or physical facility stage.

Event date

November 8, 2023

Source publication date

November 9, 2023

Disposition date

November 8, 2023

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health · Other

Residents raised noise, power-allocation, watercourse, wildlife, health and public-information concerns about the NE Edge Millstone proposal in Waterford's October 2, 2023 meeting record and attached letters. Earlier Siting Council correspondence records a hearing request. The town minutes also record public support. These are historical public concerns, not agency findings of harm or proof of a current project or permit outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of these historical public concerns, hearing requests and separate boundary procedure is unknown in this bounded review. Acknowledgment, an agenda item or a company update does not establish a granted hearing, current permit, operating impacts or resolution of every concern.

Event date

October 2, 2023

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

October 2, 2023 is the actual town meeting and attached-letter date, distinct from the October4 record stamp. The separate resident request is dated September7 and acknowledged September8; no later hearing outcome or agenda completion is inferred. First public posting of the town minutes and Siting Council packet is unknown. Meeting, letter, acknowledgment and record-stamp dates do not substitute for source publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning

Maryland Department of the Environment notified Quantum Maryland that it was referring reported site violations for Attorney General enforcement. An earlier letter withdrew conditional approval of a utility-work environmental plan and cited unapproved work and groundwater discharge. These are historical agency actions, not a verified filed lawsuit, current campus shutdown or measured environmental harm.

Record status: Unknown. The current enforcement disposition and status of the specific historical plan action are unknown in this bounded review. Referral does not establish a filed court case, awarded penalty, current shutdown or final compliance outcome. Later separately listed plan approvals do not by themselves resolve this record.

Event date

September 7, 2023

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

September 7, 2023 is stamped on the original referral notice. The earlier plan-withdrawal letter is dated May 25, and the company response is dated June 28. No later court filing or disposition day is inferred. First public posting of these documents is unknown. The company response is dated June 28, 2023 despite its May-looking filename; neither document date nor filename is substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Other

Port of Cascade Locks and Roundhouse said in their joint July 20, 2023 announcement that the community support needed for their proposed computing project was not achieved. They attributed the decision to discontinue the project to community feedback and incompatibility with current community sentiments. This is the joint participants account rather than direct resident testimony, a petition total, measured harm, a general ban or physical closure.

Record status: Unknown. The original Port joint statement explicitly identifies the Roundhouse proposal and describes insufficient community support. It does not independently establish current concern disposition, a complete public comment record or the present outcome of every possible project at the Port.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

July 20, 2023

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The joint public announcement is dated July 20, 2023. The exact first community comment, underlying discontinuation decision and complete public input chronology are not independently dated in this bounded source. The release date is printed in the original Port announcement. Its date does not become an exact first community objection or physical facility closure day.

Raised or recorded by Port of Cascade Locks.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Air and generators

California Energy Commission recorded the filing of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Lafayette Data Center and backup generating proposal. The cover and filing record identify it as a draft environmental review. This item records that regulatory document, not a final impact determination, permit completion, current compliance or an operating milestone.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

April 6, 2023

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 22, 2026

April 6, 2023 is the docketed filing day. The cover reports April 2023; an exact first publication day is not independently established. The notice or final document publication day is explicit when given. A docketing day remains a filing date. A source check does not replace either date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use

Valley Water requested analysis of water demand, supply and recycled-water options in its environmental-review comment for the Martin Data Center at 651 Martin Avenue. The agency also requested protection of existing wells. This is an agency comment requesting analysis, not a finding of excess use, pollution or a permit violation.

Record status: Unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date

March 15, 2023

Source publication date

March 15, 2023

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Valley Water.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Land use and zoning · Other

Warrenton Planning Commission recorded a recommendation of denial, as summarized in the Town FAQ, citing missing noise and power information, tax justification, scenic gateway and viewshed effects, Comprehensive Plan compliance and decommissioning information. The FAQ dates the recommendation to December 20, 2022. This is an attributed historical advisory assessment, not the final Council action, a current permit violation or measured harm.

Record status: Unknown. The selected historical public record establishes the attributed episode. A current concern disposition and later published response remain unverified. A land use recommendation or proffer decision does not itself resolve the concern or establish physical harm.

Event date

December 20, 2022

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

This dates the selected public record episode, not the earliest concern or a present physical effect. The selected public record supplies the action day; exact first online publication day remains unverified.

Raised or recorded by Warrenton Planning Commission.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch issued standard review comments identifying water-quality, discharge-permit and stormwater-planning requirements for the Hawaiki Kapolei cable landing project. Its letter appears in the final environmental assessment with the applicant's response. This is historical review correspondence, not a notice of violation or measured pollution finding. All later permit and compliance outcomes are unknown in this review. A new source check does not establish present site conditions.

Record status: Unknown. The current outcome of the specific water-quality requirements and later permit/compliance processes is unknown in this bounded historical review. Applicant commitments and the EA review do not establish implemented controls, measured discharges or present compliance.

Event date

January 4, 2017

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The actual agency letter is dated January 4, 2017; the January9 received stamp is a separate receipt. April11 is the later applicant response date, not the agency comment or source publication. The first public posting date of the original EA packet is unknown. A May23 filename and cover stamps are not substituted for its publication or the January4 comment date.

Raised or recorded by Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Other

Delaware Coalition for Open Government requested disclosure of project ownership and financing, rigorous review of the business plan and caution before public infrastructure funding. The posted draft minutes record these transparency requests; they do not establish financial misconduct, insolvency, misuse of funds or a current project impact.

Record status: Unknown. The selected historical public record establishes an institutional concern episode. A current concern disposition, later response and present physical effects are not separately verified. Historical funding or lease actions do not establish that the concern itself was resolved.

Event date

May 4, 2016

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

This dates the selected historical public record episode, not the earliest public concern, a current physical impact or the source check. The posted draft minutes supply the meeting day, while the exact first online publication day remains unverified.

Raised or recorded by Delaware Coalition for Open Government.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators · Land use and zoning

University of Delaware published its working group concerns about the proposed power plant scale, emissions and fit with the STAR Campus science mission, and its recommendation against supporting the project. The University published that assessment with its lease termination announcement. These are attributed institutional conclusions about a proposal, not Atlas measurements, a regulator violation finding or proof of physical facility closure.

Record status: Unknown. The selected historical public record establishes an institutional concern episode. A current concern disposition, later response and present physical effects are not separately verified. Historical funding or lease actions do not establish that the concern itself was resolved.

Event date

July 10, 2014

Source publication date

July 10, 2014

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

This dates the selected historical public record episode, not the earliest public concern, a current physical impact or the source check. The University account expressly supplies July 10, 2014 as its publication day.

Raised or recorded by University of Delaware.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators · Noise · Health · Other

Washington Department of Ecology recorded public comments about generator changes, noise, potential health effects and access to understandable Spanish language permit information in the Microsoft Columbia air permit review. Appendix B records the comments and agency answers, including an extended comment period and a hearing with no public attendance. Ecology explains that noise regulation is local and that the requested change concerned bypass use rather than a new maintenance time window. These comments and agency explanations do not establish measured harm, a violation or final resolution of the underlying concerns.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 23, 2026

The appendix compiles comments across December 30, 2024 through February 27, 2025. A single first concern filing day for this combined episode is not established. The February 20 hearing had no public attendance according to Ecology. The order is dated March 28, 2025. The exact first online publication day of the combined order and appendices was not established.

Raised or recorded by Washington Department of Ecology.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Air and generators

Loudoun County reported persistent data center noise complaints and described residents raising air-quality concerns on its countywide information page. The page describes complaint review and enforcement processes. It does not identify an individual complaint case, publish a complaint count or establish a violation at any Atlas site.

Record status: Unknown. No individual complaint case or adjudicated outcome is established by this countywide informational page.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

No exact event date is supplied for this countywide informational account. The captured county page supplies no reliable exact publication date for this account.

Raised or recorded by Loudoun County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Water use · Noise · Power and electric rates · Other

Box Elder County said in its original Stratos fact sheet that it received supportive and critical submissions and that recurring topics included water, noise, community effects, electricity prices and public finances. The County published assurances about the proposed project in response. These are attributed County accounts rather than direct resident testimony, independently measured impacts, verified unique resident totals or an operator response.

Record status: Unknown. The County reports mixed supportive and critical feedback and publishes its own responses. This bounded account does not independently establish the complete comment history, current concern resolution, representative community opinion or measured harm.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 24, 2026

The original current County fact sheet does not independently date the first public submission or individual recurring concern. Exact event dates remain unknown. No exact fact sheet publication day is independently printed in the read body. The retrieval day is not a public concern event or publication day.

Raised or recorded by Box Elder County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item