Community concerns.

Water use

Arizona Public Media reported that Tucson revoked a contractor's temporary construction-water meter used for Project Blue dust control, while Beale Infrastructure described the permit as following normal procedures and said it was seeking another source. The outlet later reported separate groundwater-well authorizations. These accounts concern different water arrangements, not an independently inspected violation, final project closure or measured water use.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the reported construction-water dispute is unknown in this bounded review. Separate groundwater authorizations, company procedural statements and continued project activity do not establish that every water concern was resolved, a violation was adjudicated, credits were transferred or actual water use was measured.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

May 6, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The first outlet report describes a May 4 city letter, but the exact day the construction meter was actually revoked is not independently established. The event date stays unknown; a reported letter, article date and check date are separate. The original reports display May 6 and May 28, 2026 publication with same-day modifications. The item retains the initial May 6 reporting day; later context and this source check are not a filing, revocation or current compliance date.

Raised or recorded by Arizona Public Media.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates

WFYI Public Media reported that residents questioned noise, water use and power demand associated with the Metrobloks proposal in Martindale-Brightwood as the city council approved its rezoning request on May 4, 2026. This news report does not establish construction or the outcome of those concerns.

Record status: Unknown. The outcome of the reported concerns is not established by this bounded source review.

Event date

May 4, 2026

Source publication date

May 4, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The article explicitly identifies the council meeting date; it is not the source-check date. The original article displays this publication date and local time.

Raised or recorded by WFYI Public Media.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators · Land use and zoning

Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board issued a final order affirming DNREC's coastal-zone status decision for Starwood's Project Washington after an administrative appeal. The decision addresses the project's heavy-industry classification, including its generator context. It does not establish measured emissions, a current operating violation or the result of any later court case. All later judicial and revised-proposal outcomes are unknown in this review. A source check does not advance the project's physical status.

Record status: Resolved. Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board issued its April 17, 2026 final order affirming the Secretary's status decision. Resolved applies only to this administrative appeal. Later judicial appeals, revised proposals, present permit conditions and all underlying environmental concerns were not independently established.

Event date

February 17, 2026

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

April 17, 2026

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original order states that CZICB2026-01 was filed February 17, 2026. The March24-26 hearing and April17 signed final order are separate later events; the disposition date remains separately recorded. The first public posting of the signed order is unknown. April 17, 2026 is its dated disposition, not an invented first-publication day.

Raised or recorded by Delaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators

Utah Division of Air Quality lists air-permit application N159410011 for Stadion LLC at the Eagle Mountain data-center campus, received April 10, 2026. Its public row shows draft permitting documents under review, with a separate August 7 update field. This is an application-review record, not an issued permit, an inspection finding or verification of operation or compliance.

Record status: Pending. Utah Division of Air Quality currently lists draft permitting documents under review for the named application. Pending applies only to that listed review step; an issued permit, later original determination, actual operation and present air compliance have not been established in this bounded review. The exact day this draft-review step began is unknown; the August 7 update field is not substituted for a transition day.

Event date

April 10, 2026

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The agency table labels April 10, 2026 as NOI received. This is an application-receipt event, not a hearing, public comment, issuance, startup or violation date. No first public posting day for the changing agency table or application is established. Its most-recent-update field is not substituted for a publication date.

Raised or recorded by Utah Division of Air Quality.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge

Oregon Capital Chronicle reported an Amazon settlement announcement over regional groundwater allegations, alongside the company's denial and no admission of liability. Later OPB reporting described court approval as pending at that time. This county-level news context does not establish present final approval, payment, causation, completed remediation or responsibility at an individual data-center campus.

Record status: Unknown. The present final approval, payment and remedial outcome are unknown in this bounded review. OPB reported approval pending in August; an announced settlement or reported preliminary-approval lead does not establish final court approval, actual disbursement, admitted liability or resolution of all regional groundwater concerns.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 31, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The article reports a settlement announcement but the original signed execution, filing or actual approval date was not independently established. The event date stays unknown; publication and a relative Tuesday reference are not substituted for a verified court event. The original Oregon Capital Chronicle report displays March 31, 2026 publication with later same-day company/group updates. The independently read OPB follow-up is published August 12, not its August 13 syndication. Source checks are separate from all execution, court and payment dates.

Raised or recorded by Oregon Capital Chronicle.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Land use and zoning

WWMT reported that residents raised noise and property-value concerns near Hyperscale Data's Dowagiac campus as the company discussed expansion. The article also described city noise-rule and development-proposal discussions; this report does not establish a violation or current case outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The current disposition of the reported concerns is not established by this bounded source review.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 31, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

A single dated concern event is not established by the article. Its publication date is not substituted for an event day. The original WWMT article identifies March 31, 2026 as publication and April 1 as an update; the update is not a new event or first publication.

Raised or recorded by WWMT.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning

Tulsa Flyer reported water and electricity concerns about Coweta's Project Atlas and Beale Infrastructure's March 30, 2026 announcement that it was withdrawing the proposal. The report attributes the withdrawal to company statements and a city account. It does not establish measured environmental conditions or that every underlying concern was resolved.

Record status: Withdrawn. Tulsa Flyer reported that Beale announced withdrawal of the Coweta proposal on March 30, 2026, with the city separately acknowledging notification that day. Withdrawn applies only to that reported proposal; it is not a water-quality finding, resolution of every concern or a permanent ban on future projects.

Event date

March 30, 2026

Source publication date

March 30, 2026

Disposition date

March 30, 2026

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The March 30, 2026 original report records the company withdrawal announcement and the city's same-day account of notification. This is a reported announcement date, not an independently inspected signed zoning-withdrawal instrument. The original Tulsa Flyer report displays March 30, 2026 publication and same-day update. That is outlet publication, not a separately verified company-original statement publication day.

Raised or recorded by Tulsa Flyer.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Power and electric rates · Other

Alliance for Affordable Energy published a report raising questions about Hyperion's energy financing, potential ratepayer cost exposure and access to project agreements. The report discusses possible future outcomes. It does not establish actual customer bill changes, a regulatory violation or measured environmental effects.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the documented ratepayer and transparency concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Report forecasts and company commitments do not establish actual savings, cost transfers, a final current regulatory outcome or resolution of every concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The report discusses several past decisions and future possibilities without one independently verified exact concern event day. The event remains unknown. The report cover states 2026 but supplies no exact publication day. The May 18 URL path and source-check date are not substituted for first publication.

Raised or recorded by Alliance for Affordable Energy.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Iowa Public Radio reported residents' concerns about noise, water and electricity use, nearby habitat and property values around Simple Mining's proposed Cedar Falls location. The article distinguishes that proposal from the utility's Viking power plant. Its announced later discussion is not proof of a final rezoning outcome, measured effects or present mine operation.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the documented concerns and proposed rezoning is unknown in this bounded original-article review. An inherited title or a scheduled later discussion does not establish a final vote, current operation, measured noise or resolution of each concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 26, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The article reports an earlier rezoning discussion but does not establish its exact day in the bounded source. The event date stays unknown; planned April dates are not accomplished events. The original report displays March 26, 2026 publication, separate from the unknown exact discussion date and this source check.

Raised or recorded by Iowa Public Radio.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Light · Traffic and construction · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

Maryland Department of the Environment recorded public questions about Amazon's proposed generators, health, water, noise, construction and electricity in Frederick County. It made a final determination to issue the air permit effective March 25, 2026. That determination addresses the named air-permit procedure, not measured operating conditions or resolution of every concern.

Record status: Resolved. Maryland Department of the Environment recorded a final determination effective March 25, 2026. Resolved applies only to that named air-permit determination. It does not establish actual operation, measured emissions, current compliance, all local approvals or resolution of every comment.

Event date

December 8, 2025

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

March 25, 2026

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

December 8, 2025 is the original documented public meeting date. March 25, 2026 is the separately stated effective final determination, not a source-check or invented hearing day. The first public posting of the packet is unknown. Meeting, application and effective determination dates are separate from publication; the current agency index does not supply a first posting day.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates · Light · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning

Iowa Public Radio reported residents' questions about water, electricity, traffic, lighting and noise at a town hall concerning Google's Palo proposal. The report describes differing county and mayor positions on local review and annexation. Those positions do not establish corporate motives, the applicable final rules, completed annexation, a permit outcome or measured impacts.

Record status: Unknown. The later outcome of these documented questions is unknown in this bounded review. Mayor or county statements and requests for further detail do not resolve actual resource impacts, legal jurisdiction, permit conditions or current project status.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 25, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The March report describes a Tuesday town hall without an independently checked exact meeting day. The event date remains unknown; the publication day is not substituted. The original town-hall report displays March 25, 2026, with separate March 4 background reporting. Article updates and source checks do not establish a meeting or permit date.

Raised or recorded by Iowa Public Radio.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Land use and zoning

KFYR reported progress on individual settlement agreements following residents' noise and property-value allegations concerning Atlas Power near Williston. The outlet recorded company counsel's account of finalized and still-negotiated agreements. The original settlement and current court disposition were not independently reviewed, and the report does not establish measured noise abatement or resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The current disposition of the documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Reported progress, future commitments, permit notices or historical project statements do not establish actual impacts, current compliance or resolution of all concerns.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 13, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original source reports historical concerns or a developing procedure without one independently verified exact concern-event day; weekday or year-only references are not converted to guessed dates. The displayed original publication day is recorded separately from the event and source check.

Raised or recorded by KFYR.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Light · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

South Carolina Environmental Law Project raised land-use, water, air, noise, light, energy and health concerns about Eagle Rock's proposed Cooks Hill Road campus in Colleton County. The group questioned compatibility with the rural ACE Basin setting. These are attributed concerns and legal positions, not Atlas findings of measured harm or an issued permit outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The later original zoning, permit and concern outcomes are unknown in this bounded review. Group criticism, related policy debates and company water forecasts do not establish a legal violation, measured conditions, current project approval or resolution of every concern.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

March 6, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The changing group page discusses an application and concerns without an exact filing or testimony day established in this bounded review. Event date remains unknown; publication is not substituted. The group page displays March 6, 2026. The earlier SC Daily Gazette report was published February 5; its account of a December company statement has no independently established original statement day.

Raised or recorded by South Carolina Environmental Law Project.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use · Power and electric rates · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

KCUR reported water, power, wildlife and health concerns raised at a February 10 community meeting about Nebius's Independence proposal. The article also describes differing company and city positions. These are reported questions, not measured impacts or an independently verified permit or ratepayer outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The outcome of these reported concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Company resource and ratepayer commitments do not establish measured performance or resolution of every question.

Event date

February 10, 2026

Source publication date

February 13, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The article explicitly identifies February 10, 2026 as the community meeting. This was not an independently inspected agency hearing or complaint filing. KCUR published the report February 13, 2026. The changing original Nebius project page has no independently established first publication day.

Raised or recorded by KCUR.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection announced a comment hearing on Project Hazelnut's water-obstruction and stormwater permit applications, including discharges to Black Creek, Stony Creek and nearby wetlands. The notice scheduled a February 17 hearing with a snow date. It does not establish that the hearing occurred, what residents said, permit issuance or a violation.

Record status: Unknown. The later permit and comment-process outcome is unknown in this bounded review. A hearing notice does not establish actual testimony, a final decision, measured discharge, resolution of concerns or present compliance.

Event date

February 12, 2026

Source publication date

February 12, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

February 12, 2026 is the dated announcement, not proof that the planned February 17 hearing or reserved February 19 snow date occurred. The original agency release displays February 12, 2026 publication. The developer page is undated; its source check date and copyright year do not establish publication.

Raised or recorded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

Residents raised concerns about noise, water, electric rates, construction dust, health, land use and wildlife during Van Buren Township's Project Cannoli planning review. The minutes record differing views and conditional preliminary approval requiring further steps, including recurring sound monitoring and construction controls. They do not establish measured harm, a violation or resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the residents' concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The recorded preliminary approval and developer commitments do not establish final approval, actual operation, measured compliance or that each concern was resolved.

Event date

February 11, 2026

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original minutes record the February 11, 2026 meeting and testimony. This is not an inferred first complaint date. A first public posting date for these municipal minutes has not been established. The URL folder year and PDF creation metadata are not used as publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Other

New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a complaint alleging that Doña Ana County violated open-meetings requirements when adopting Project Jupiter ordinances. It requested that the ordinances and related commitments be voided. These are the filed allegations and requested relief, not a court finding or a verified cancellation of the project.

Record status: Unknown. The current independent court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. Counsel describes the litigation as ongoing, but no present docket or final ruling was inspected. The complaint does not establish that its requested ordinance invalidation or other relief was granted.

Event date

February 6, 2026

Source publication date

February 10, 2026

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original court stamp and signature identify February 6, 2026 as the filing day. This is separate from the September 19, 2025 county meeting and the earlier bond-application lawsuit. Source New Mexico published February 10, 2026. First public posting of the filed complaint and evolving counsel case page is unknown; publication is not substituted for the February 6 filing.

Raised or recorded by New Mexico Environmental Law Center.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Other

Residents requested eagle-habitat and permit-record information for the Nebius proposal, as recorded by Missouri Department of Natural Resources in concern 64672. The department recorded providing information with no further action. This documents an assistance request, not a formal violation complaint, inspection finding or permit decision.

Record status: Resolved. Residents requested information that the agency recorded providing. Resolved applies only to the agency's recorded information-assistance response and no-further-action entry. It does not establish absence of violations, resolved wildlife effects, permit approval or resolution of other concerns.

Exact disposition date is unknown for the information-response or closure. January 26 is labeled as receipt and investigation, so it is not substituted for a separately dated disposition.

Event date

January 24, 2026

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original agency entry explicitly records webform submission on January 24, 2026 and received/investigation dates on January 26. The exact later information-response day is not independently established. The report footer is dated March 6, 2026, but its first public posting day is unknown. The report-generation date and April URL folder are not substituted as publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Power and electric rates

Residents raised questions about approval conditions, the natural waterway and tree line, electricity and whether project commitments would be fulfilled, according to City of Warrenton minutes for the data-center hearing. The minutes also record support and a statement that most earlier questions had been addressed; this does not establish resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The current disposition of these individual public concerns is not established. The separate city approval vote does not resolve every concern.

Event date

January 20, 2026

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

January 20, 2026 is the Board meeting date recorded in the adopted minutes,not the earlier Planning Commission meeting or agenda posting. The first online publication day of the combined adopted minutes is unknown. Agenda posting January 16 and PDF metadata are not substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Air and generators

Southern Environmental Law Center reported filing an administrative appeal on behalf of the NAACP and Young, Gifted & Green challenging the initial South Memphis turbine permit and related department decisions. Its later timeline reports that the air board dismissed the appeals as moot in December 2025. The group account is not an agency violation finding or a court merits ruling.

Record status: Dismissed. Southern Environmental Law Center reported that the air board dismissed these appeals as moot on December 15, 2025. This is the group account of this administrative proceeding; no board order or finding on the allegations is certified here.

Event date

July 16, 2025

Source publication date

July 16, 2025

Disposition date

December 15, 2025

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The original release reports the filing on July 16, 2025. The outcome account separately dates dismissal to December 15, 2025. The filing release is dated July 16, 2025; the retrospective timeline is published May 8, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item