Community concerns.

Air and generators

California Energy Commission adopted Order 23-1108-07 certifying the final environmental impact report, adopting mitigation monitoring and granting a Small Power Plant Exemption for the Bowers backup generating facility. The order describes the exemption and mitigation procedure; it does not establish facility operation, all local permits or present compliance.

Record status: Resolved. California Energy Commission issued the order granting this specific Small Power Plant Exemption. Resolved applies only to that exemption proceeding, not every local approval, present compliance, individual comment outcome or physical facility stage.

Event date

November 8, 2023

Source publication date

November 9, 2023

Disposition date

November 8, 2023

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by California Energy Commission.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health · Other

Residents raised noise, power-allocation, watercourse, wildlife, health and public-information concerns about the NE Edge Millstone proposal in Waterford's October 2, 2023 meeting record and attached letters. Earlier Siting Council correspondence records a hearing request. The town minutes also record public support. These are historical public concerns, not agency findings of harm or proof of a current project or permit outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of these historical public concerns, hearing requests and separate boundary procedure is unknown in this bounded review. Acknowledgment, an agenda item or a company update does not establish a granted hearing, current permit, operating impacts or resolution of every concern.

Event date

October 2, 2023

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

October 2, 2023 is the actual town meeting and attached-letter date, distinct from the October4 record stamp. The separate resident request is dated September7 and acknowledged September8; no later hearing outcome or agenda completion is inferred. First public posting of the town minutes and Siting Council packet is unknown. Meeting, letter, acknowledgment and record-stamp dates do not substitute for source publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning

Maryland Department of the Environment notified Quantum Maryland that it was referring reported site violations for Attorney General enforcement. An earlier letter withdrew conditional approval of a utility-work environmental plan and cited unapproved work and groundwater discharge. These are historical agency actions, not a verified filed lawsuit, current campus shutdown or measured environmental harm.

Record status: Unknown. The current enforcement disposition and status of the specific historical plan action are unknown in this bounded review. Referral does not establish a filed court case, awarded penalty, current shutdown or final compliance outcome. Later separately listed plan approvals do not by themselves resolve this record.

Event date

September 7, 2023

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

September 7, 2023 is stamped on the original referral notice. The earlier plan-withdrawal letter is dated May 25, and the company response is dated June 28. No later court filing or disposition day is inferred. First public posting of these documents is unknown. The company response is dated June 28, 2023 despite its May-looking filename; neither document date nor filename is substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Maryland Department of the Environment.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water use

Valley Water requested analysis of water demand, supply and recycled-water options in its environmental-review comment for the Martin Data Center at 651 Martin Avenue. The agency also requested protection of existing wells. This is an agency comment requesting analysis, not a finding of excess use, pollution or a permit violation.

Record status: Unknown. The individual comment outcome has not been established by this bounded original-source review. A project-page process label is not its disposition.

Event date

March 15, 2023

Source publication date

March 15, 2023

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The retained original filing or effective order provides this exact event date. The retained original CEC docket wrapper gives the publication date, distinct from the source-check date.

Raised or recorded by Valley Water.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch issued standard review comments identifying water-quality, discharge-permit and stormwater-planning requirements for the Hawaiki Kapolei cable landing project. Its letter appears in the final environmental assessment with the applicant's response. This is historical review correspondence, not a notice of violation or measured pollution finding. All later permit and compliance outcomes are unknown in this review. A new source check does not establish present site conditions.

Record status: Unknown. The current outcome of the specific water-quality requirements and later permit/compliance processes is unknown in this bounded historical review. Applicant commitments and the EA review do not establish implemented controls, measured discharges or present compliance.

Event date

January 4, 2017

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The actual agency letter is dated January 4, 2017; the January9 received stamp is a separate receipt. April11 is the later applicant response date, not the agency comment or source publication. The first public posting date of the original EA packet is unknown. A May23 filename and cover stamps are not substituted for its publication or the January4 comment date.

Raised or recorded by Hawaii Department of Health, Clean Water Branch.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Air and generators

Loudoun County reported persistent data center noise complaints and described residents raising air-quality concerns on its countywide information page. The page describes complaint review and enforcement processes. It does not identify an individual complaint case, publish a complaint count or establish a violation at any Atlas site.

Record status: Unknown. No individual complaint case or adjudicated outcome is established by this countywide informational page.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

No exact event date is supplied for this countywide informational account. The captured county page supplies no reliable exact publication date for this account.

Raised or recorded by Loudoun County.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates

De Soto Chamber of Commerce reported that its community panel addressed frequently raised questions about electricity and rates, water, wastewater and noise. The page names Beale Infrastructure and Digital Realty as separate local developments. This is an area-level record of questions, not verified opposition, a formal complaint, measured impacts or an allegation assigned to either individual project.

Record status: Unknown. The later outcome of these area-level resource and nuisance questions is unknown in this bounded review. A panel, city FAQ or general design assurance does not establish a formal complaint disposition, measured conditions, implemented mitigation or resolution of every question.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The undated resource page refers to a June luncheon without an independently verified exact day or year. The event date remains unknown; the website copyright year and source-check day do not supply one. The Chamber resource and evolving city page supply no independently established exact first-publication day. Retrieval is a source check, not a new public event.

Raised or recorded by De Soto Chamber of Commerce.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Noise · Water use · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning

Integrity Matters raised questions about Project Taurus's noise analysis, generator emissions, water and electricity needs, and neighborhood protections in Colorado Springs. These are the group's stated concerns and criticisms, not Atlas findings about measured impacts, legal compliance or the current appeal outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The present official appeal disposition and outcome of these concerns are unknown in this bounded group-source review. Criticism of models or city standards is not an independent noise measurement, violation finding or proof that the project was finally approved, denied or withdrawn.

Event date

Not established

Source publication date

Not established

Disposition date

Not established

Concern sources checked

October 18, 2026

The changing group page discusses several past and scheduled proceedings. No single exact filing, testimony or current official disposition day was independently established for this bounded concern item; the event date remains unknown. No independently established first publication date is displayed for the selected changing group page. Dates of quoted records and scheduled meetings are not substituted for page publication.

Raised or recorded by Integrity Matters.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item