Data CentersAtlas
Public records and reporting

Community concerns.

See what public records and reporting say about data center concerns.

Documented items by state.Select a state, or use the state menu. Shading shows documented items, not harm. Missing items do not establish that no concern exists.Community concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers AtlasCommunity concerns page 7 | Data Centers Atlas
documented items, not harm

Newest.

The 10 most recent documented items.

  1. Bridgefield Tech CenterVirginia · Public concern on the record ·
  2. San Diego CountyCalifornia · Public concern on the record ·
  3. Smithfield Gateway Data CenterPennsylvania · Permit and comment ·
  4. MCNI Concord Township Data CenterIowa · News report ·
  5. NorthMark Strategies Spartanburg High-Performance Computing CenterSouth Carolina · Legal action ·
  6. Project Spring (Sand Springs)Oklahoma · News report ·
  7. Goodman Energy Park Data CenterCalifornia · Public concern on the record ·
  8. Aligned HPC Campus at Former Pixelle Paper Mill (Chillicothe)Ohio · News report ·
  9. RB Inyokern Data CenterCalifornia · Public concern on the record ·
  10. CyrusOne CHI1-CHI3 (Aurora)Illinois · Public concern on the record ·

Browse records.

206 documented items in this collection.

Legal action

AWS Kline Township Data Center Campus

Pennsylvania · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Other

Pennsylvania Office of Open Records granted part of a records appeal and dismissed another part as moot concerning Kline Township Amazon and NorthPoint communications and data center water correspondence. The determination says the Township did not meet its disclosure burden and directs records production or a detailed nonexistence attestation. Actual later compliance or appeal was not verified. This records decision is not a project permit denial, a finding of intentional concealment or an environmental harm finding.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original final determination records March 2, 2026 as its issued and mailed day. The original determination date is retained where explicit. The first online publication day of the undated public comment is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Pennsylvania Office of Open Records.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Microsoft Dorr Township Data Center

Michigan · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Land use and zoning

Residents expressed concerns about the Microsoft data center, as recorded in Dorr Township minutes for the February 26, 2026 meeting. The minutes do not specify the individual concern topics in that entry. The Board separately authorized a temporary data center moratorium. The comments and action do not establish a measured impact, an operating violation, project cancellation or final resolution of the residents concerns.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

This is the documented public meeting day, not a verified first concern or legal effective day. The minutes identify the meeting day. Their exact first online publication day was not independently established.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Oconee County

South Carolina · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Noise · Water use · Power and electric rates · Other

Oconee County Planning Commission subcommittee recorded a need to distinguish computing facilities from general industrial uses and propose performance standards for noise, water, power, siting, fire safety and decommissioning. The committee also discusses power supply options and asks for legal guidance. These are attributed policy questions and recommendations rather than measured impacts, final County regulations, a prohibition in every zoning district or proof that a later scheduled meeting occurred.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original subcommittee minute header identifies February 13, 2026. That dates the minuted institutional discussion rather than the first concern, final legislative action or an exact first posting day. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Oconee County Planning Commission subcommittee.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

News report

Nebius AI Factory (Independence)

Missouri · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Water use · Power and electric rates · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

KCUR reported water, power, wildlife and health concerns raised at a February 10 community meeting about Nebius's Independence proposal. The article also describes differing company and city positions. These are reported questions, not measured impacts or an independently verified permit or ratepayer outcome.

Record status: Unknown. The outcome of these reported concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Company resource and ratepayer commitments do not establish measured performance or resolution of every question.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The article explicitly identifies February 10, 2026 as the community meeting. This was not an independently inspected agency hearing or complaint filing. KCUR published the report February 13, 2026. The changing original Nebius project page has no independently established first publication day.

Raised or recorded by KCUR.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Permit and comment

Project Hazelnut

Pennsylvania · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Water quality and discharge · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection announced a comment hearing on Project Hazelnut's water-obstruction and stormwater permit applications, including discharges to Black Creek, Stony Creek and nearby wetlands. The notice scheduled a February 17 hearing with a snow date. It does not establish that the hearing occurred, what residents said, permit issuance or a violation.

Record status: Unknown. The later permit and comment-process outcome is unknown in this bounded review. A hearing notice does not establish actual testimony, a final decision, measured discharge, resolution of concerns or present compliance.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

February 12, 2026 is the dated announcement, not proof that the planned February 17 hearing or reserved February 19 snow date occurred. The original agency release displays February 12, 2026 publication. The developer page is undated; its source check date and copyright year do not establish publication.

Raised or recorded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Project Cannoli

Michigan · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates · Traffic and construction · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Health

Residents raised concerns about noise, water, electric rates, construction dust, health, land use and wildlife during Van Buren Township's Project Cannoli planning review. The minutes record differing views and conditional preliminary approval requiring further steps, including recurring sound monitoring and construction controls. They do not establish measured harm, a violation or resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The later disposition of the residents' concerns is unknown in this bounded review. The recorded preliminary approval and developer commitments do not establish final approval, actual operation, measured compliance or that each concern was resolved.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original minutes record the February 11, 2026 meeting and testimony. This is not an inferred first complaint date. A first public posting date for these municipal minutes has not been established. The URL folder year and PDF creation metadata are not used as publication dates.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Legal action

Stargate Project Jupiter

New Mexico · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Land use and zoning · Other

New Mexico Environmental Law Center filed a complaint alleging that Doña Ana County violated open-meetings requirements when adopting Project Jupiter ordinances. It requested that the ordinances and related commitments be voided. These are the filed allegations and requested relief, not a court finding or a verified cancellation of the project.

Record status: Unknown. The current independent court disposition is unknown in this bounded review. Counsel describes the litigation as ongoing, but no present docket or final ruling was inspected. The complaint does not establish that its requested ordinance invalidation or other relief was granted.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original court stamp and signature identify February 6, 2026 as the filing day. This is separate from the September 19, 2025 county meeting and the earlier bond-application lawsuit. Source New Mexico published February 10, 2026. First public posting of the filed complaint and evolving counsel case page is unknown; publication is not substituted for the February 6 filing.

Raised or recorded by New Mexico Environmental Law Center.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Decennial Group Akron Data Center

Indiana · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Water use · Water quality and discharge · Noise · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning · Other

Residents raised concerns about water demand, wells, electricity use, noise, agricultural land, taxes, fire protection and public notice during the February 10, 2026 Fulton County planning discussion. The same original minutes record Decennial representatives describing an exploratory computing proposal without a selected site or signed agreement. These are attributed concerns within that proposal discussion, without verified contamination, measured noise, established rate impacts, a selected physical property or proof of resolution.

Record status: Unknown. The selected original record attributes residents questions to the County computing discussion in which Decennial representatives outlined an exploratory proposal. Potential impacts are not independently measured or resolved. Later general pause adoption does not prove resolution of water, noise, land or power concerns.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The exact February 10, 2026 public meeting dates the recorded residents concerns. This is not independently the first day concerns were raised. The original scanned minutes establish the meeting day without independently establishing first publication. No archive, recorder or retrieval day becomes a publication date.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Permit and comment

QTS Dane County Hyperscale Campus (DeForest)

Wisconsin · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Land use and zoning

Village of DeForest project timeline records a unanimous vote rejecting the QTS direct annexation petition on February 3, 2026. An earlier village statement described the proposal as infeasible in DeForest and recommended rejection. These are attributed municipal process records. They do not establish measured environmental harm, final withdrawal of every application or the outcome of a different proposal.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

February 3, 2026 is the vote date recorded in the official project timeline. It differs from the earlier consolidation decision. January 27, 2026 is the staff release date. The project timeline first publication or update date for its later vote entry is not established.

Raised or recorded by Village of DeForest.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Nebius AI Factory (Independence)

Missouri · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Other

Residents requested eagle-habitat and permit-record information for the Nebius proposal, as recorded by Missouri Department of Natural Resources in concern 64672. The department recorded providing information with no further action. This documents an assistance request, not a formal violation complaint, inspection finding or permit decision.

Record status: Resolved. Residents requested information that the agency recorded providing. Resolved applies only to the agency's recorded information-assistance response and no-further-action entry. It does not establish absence of violations, resolved wildlife effects, permit approval or resolution of other concerns.

Exact disposition date is unknown for the information-response or closure. January 26 is labeled as receipt and investigation, so it is not substituted for a separately dated disposition.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original agency entry explicitly records webform submission on January 24, 2026 and received/investigation dates on January 26. The exact later information-response day is not independently established. The report footer is dated March 6, 2026, but its first public posting day is unknown. The report-generation date and April URL folder are not substituted as publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Crusoe Warrenton Campus

Missouri · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Power and electric rates

Residents raised questions about approval conditions, the natural waterway and tree line, electricity and whether project commitments would be fulfilled, according to City of Warrenton minutes for the data-center hearing. The minutes also record support and a statement that most earlier questions had been addressed; this does not establish resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The current disposition of these individual public concerns is not established. The separate city approval vote does not resolve every concern.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

January 20, 2026 is the Board meeting date recorded in the adopted minutes,not the earlier Planning Commission meeting or agenda posting. The first online publication day of the combined adopted minutes is unknown. Agenda posting January 16 and PDF metadata are not substituted for publication.

Raised or recorded by Residents.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Karis Critical Naperville Data Center

Illinois · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Air and generators · Land use and zoning

Naperville City Council discussed air dispersion modeling for the proposed Karis Critical data center during its January 20, 2026 meeting. The minutes also record the petitioner representative describing revisions in response to resident concerns and an intended future study. The Council denied the requested conditional use ordinance in a separate motion. These are attributed planning and air review accounts, without independently verified measured harm, a completed study or a finding that concerns were resolved.

Record status: Unknown. The final Council minutes document the air review discussion and a separate conditional use denial. That legal decision does not independently establish measured environmental conditions, resolution of the concerns, permanent project abandonment or present computing stage.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The exact January 20, 2026 Council meeting dates this institutional discussion and record. The first day that an individual raised a concern is not established. The final minutes carry a February 4, 2026 print date, which does not independently establish their exact first publication day.

Raised or recorded by Naperville City Council.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Rockdale County

Georgia · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Power and electric rates · Air and generators · Land use and zoning · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Other

Rockdale County Board of Commissioners recorded potential data center demands on land, electricity, water supply, wastewater, stormwater and emergency services in its signed resolution. It identified possible generator emissions, noise, heat discharge and effects on surrounding residential, agricultural and sensitive areas as matters needing analysis. These are attributed legislative findings about possible effects, not measured injury or violations at every facility. The resolution separately discusses battery storage fire and explosion risks, which are not assigned to all data centers.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The signed original records January 13, 2026 adoption. That dates the institutional record rather than the first time any resident or agency raised each issue. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Rockdale County Board of Commissioners.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Permit and comment

Prologis 5853 Rue Ferrari

California · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Land use and zoning · Air and generators

City of San Jose recorded a site development permit amendment for the Rue Ferrari property, describing research and laboratory use with backup generators and utility equipment. The state notice reports the city approval and environmental determinations. It does not independently establish an operating data center, measured emissions or completion of the equipment.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

December 10, 2025 is the recorded approval date. December 18 is the state notice posting date. The notice or final document publication day is explicit when given. A docketing day remains a filing date. A source check does not replace either date.

Raised or recorded by City of San Jose.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Legal action

Colossus

Tennessee · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Air and generators

Southern Environmental Law Center reported filing an administrative appeal on behalf of the NAACP and Young, Gifted & Green challenging the initial South Memphis turbine permit and related department decisions. Its later timeline reports that the air board dismissed the appeals as moot in December 2025. The group account is not an agency violation finding or a court merits ruling.

Record status: Dismissed. Southern Environmental Law Center reported that the air board dismissed these appeals as moot on December 15, 2025. This is the group account of this administrative proceeding; no board order or finding on the allegations is certified here.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Concern sources checked

The original release reports the filing on July 16, 2025. The outcome account separately dates dismissal to December 15, 2025. The filing release is dated July 16, 2025; the retrospective timeline is published May 8, 2026.

Raised or recorded by Southern Environmental Law Center.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Silver Bow County

Montana · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Water use · Power and electric rates · Wildlife, wetlands and stormwater · Other

Montana Environmental Information Center reported Butte community questions about data-center water demand, drought, wildlife, electricity costs and access to project information. Its account discusses existing and proposed facilities without a verified assignment of each question to a particular campus. This is an area-level public-group record, not measured harm, an agency violation or an allegation assigned to every Silver Bow County site.

Record status: Unknown. The present disposition of these area-level resource and transparency concerns is unknown in this bounded group-source review. Submitted questions, forecast demand and general regulatory proposals do not establish actual water or electricity effects, an agency finding or resolution of every concern.

Event date
Not established
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The group report refers to an October16 community event without an independently verified explicit event year. The exact event date remains unknown, rather than inferred from publication. The original group article is dated December 15, 2025 and identifies its December2025 issue. January16,2026 is modification, not a new event. The evolving resource page first-publication day is unknown.

Raised or recorded by Montana Environmental Information Center.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Public concern on the record

Juab County

Utah · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Water use

Nephi City Council recorded a desire to limit excessive water use by computing development and require projects to provide their own water resources during development in the Industrial 4 ordinance recitals. These are institutional resource policy concerns rather than measured water depletion, a violation, an allegation against an individual facility or a Countywide prohibition. A separate Industrial 1 modular computing pathway remains distinct, and adopting zoning text does not establish resolution of the underlying resource question.

Record status: Unknown. The selected institutional account records concern or a proposed legislative reason for review. Current concern resolution, measured facility effects, final current legal disposition and individual project eligibility remain unverified. A pause, draft text, extension or vote does not establish resolution of the underlying concern.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The signed original records December 2, 2025 passage and recording. Its certificate states December 3 publication or posting, while the State notice was posted December 4. Those distinct source dates are not harmonized and do not establish the first concern day. The exact first public posting day of this original government document is not independently established. Signed instrument dates and printed meeting dates remain separate.

Raised or recorded by Nephi City Council.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

News report

QTS Bessemer (Project Marvel)

Alabama · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Noise · Water use · Water quality and discharge · Air and generators · Power and electric rates · Land use and zoning

Alabama Reflector reported residents' and environmental groups' water, air, noise and electric-rate concerns at a November 18, 2025 Bessemer meeting about Project Marvel. Later reporting described continuing transparency and resource questions. The outlet-reported rezoning is not measured environmental performance or resolution of every concern.

Record status: Unknown. The present outcome of these documented concerns is unknown in this bounded review. Reported rezoning and developer study claims do not establish measured impacts, current compliance, final environmental permits or resolution of every concern.

Event date
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The original meeting photo caption explicitly identifies November 18, 2025. That hearing is separate from an original signed rezoning instrument, later public-records dispute or current permit outcome. The original meeting report was published November 19, 2025. The later resource/transparency article was published August 3, 2026; its relative month wording is not used to invent a separate event day.

Raised or recorded by Alabama Reflector.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Permit and comment

Homer City Energy Campus

Pennsylvania · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Air and generators · Health · Power and electric rates · Other

Pennsylvania DEP recorded public concerns about air pollution, health and energy costs and requests for more participation and information about possible adjacent data centers. Its November 18, 2025 response explains that the reviewed authorization is for a generating station and does not authorize data center construction or operation. The record documents public comments and agency responses, not measured harm from an operating data center or an independent Atlas environmental finding.

Record status: Unknown. The bounded review establishes the documented action and attributed statements only. It does not establish final resolution of underlying public concerns, present compliance or measured site effects.

Event date
Not established
Source publication date
Disposition date
Not established
Concern sources checked

The exact days of individual public comments are not established by this bounded agency response review. This is the date printed on the original agency document. The first online posting day was not independently established.

Raised or recorded by Pennsylvania DEP.

No item-specific published company response was verified in the bounded source review. This does not establish that a company declined to respond.

Report a correction · Link to this item

Permit and comment

Greenidge Generation

New York · Latest recorded activity:

Read record

Air and generators

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued a Title V renewal denial for Greenidge Station, citing greenhouse-gas limits under state climate law. The later November 2025 disposition describes withdrawal of that denial under a signed settlement and remands the application for final processing. This historical permitting record does not establish a current violation, closure or a subsequently issued final permit.

Record status: Withdrawn. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recorded withdrawal of the historical denial and administrative hearing request in the November 18, 2025 disposition, confirmed November 19. It does not establish completion of later public/EPA review, actual final permit issuance, achieved emissions reductions, all-party agreement or present compliance. The order records that the public-group petitioners did not concur.

Event date
Source publication date
Not established
Disposition date
Concern sources checked

June 30, 2022 is the original denial letter date. The separate November 18, 2025 ALJ disposition is the date used for withdrawal, confirmed by the regional decision dated November 19. The source documents have dated actions and signatures, but exact first public posting days are not established. They stay separate from this source check date.

Raised or recorded by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Report a correction · Link to this item

About this information

What public sources record about data center concerns, with the original attribution, dates and limits.

Counts describe documentation, not harm or severity. Coverage is incomplete. A missing item does not establish that no concern was raised. A resolved procedural petition does not resolve the underlying allegations.

Newest recorded activity first, using the latest known event, disposition, item-source publication or verified company-response publication date. A source-check date never moves an item up the list. Unknown activity dates are excluded when a date range is selected.

How this is tracked.

Each item is individually checked against its public source and an existing Atlas site, campus, project or exact county ID. Event, source publication, disposition and source-check dates stay separate. Unknown dates and outcomes stay unknown. Private residents speaking publicly are labeled Residents; private residents' names are not printed.

Regulator record
An agency-published inspection finding, notice, order or penalty.
Permit and comment
A permit record, public comment period or hearing notice. A notice does not establish approval.
Formal complaint
An agency-published complaint record or count, distinct from a violation finding.
Legal action
A filed action, appeal or notice of intent. Allegations and procedural rulings retain their own scope.
Public concern on the record
Public testimony, a group statement, petition, resolution or recorded letter.
News report
A reported concern attributed to the named outlet, distinct from an agency finding.

The Atlas attributes statements and does not decide who is right. Verified published company responses appear beside the item they address, with their publication basis and relationship to the record. No verified response does not establish refusal. Category counts can overlap and are never a severity ranking.

Open, pending and unknown items require a source recheck within 120 days. The due date does not advance because the website is rebuilt. County-wide items do not create site findings or map pins. The optional neutral Concerns map layer is off by default.

Report a correction. Corrections are reviewed before publication.

Water combines water use and water quality records. Category counts can overlap. The state map counts documented items in this collection, not physical sites or measured effects.

Download the records.

Download all concerns CSV Download all concerns JSON

Updated . What changed: Dated page documentation. Individual source dates remain with the evidence.